We Had Another Massive Second Amendment Win Today
Fox Sports Host Had Three Words That Perfectly Describe the WNBA After Latest...
Don't Forget the Broader Context of the Iranian Memorandum
One Guy Leaves and Katy Tur Declares MAGA Over; Now It's Acceptable to...
Welcome to National Democrats’ No Good, Very Bad Week in Maine
Here's More About Graham Platner's Perverted Reddit History
Don't Be Fooled. Socialism Is Absolutely Tenable Nationwide.
The IRGC Just Fired on a Cargo Ship in the Strait of Hormuz
NC Tax Preparer Pleads Guilty in $13.9M COVID-19 Fraud Scheme
Raleigh Man Pleads Guilty in $60 Million Medi-Cal, Medicare Kickback Scheme
Trump Asks Congressional Republicans to 'Unify' As 'Save America Act' Fight Intensifies
Texas Man Pleads Guilty in Tech-Support Scam That Bilked Elderly Victims of $1.2...
Indian National Pleads Guilty in Staged Robbery-for-Visa Conspiracy
NC Caseworker Sentenced to Prison for $100K+ SNAP Fraud Scheme
Usha Vance Had the Perfect Response to This Bizarre NYT Story
Tipsheet

Judge Orders DOJ Must Respond to Motion Seeking Mar-a-Lago Search Warrant

Judge Orders DOJ Must Respond to Motion Seeking Mar-a-Lago Search Warrant
AP Photo/Wilfredo Lee

A magistrate judge has ordered the Biden DOJ to respond to a request from government watchdog Judicial Watch which filed a motion in U.S. District Court to have the search warrant — that saw Mar-a-Lago raided by the FBI — unsealed by authorities. 

Advertisement

Here's the case Judicial Watch made in its filing:

Judicial Watch is investigating the potential politicization of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. Department of Justice and whether the FBI and the Justice Department are abusing their law enforcement powers to harass a likely future political opponent of President Biden.

[...]

The public has an urgent and substantial interest in understanding the predicate for the execution of the unprecedented search warrant of the private residence of a former president and likely future political opponent…. [N]o official explanation or information has been released about the search. As of the filing of this motion, the public record consists solely of speculation and inuendo. In short, the historical presumption of access to warrant materials vastly outweighs any interest the government may have in keeping the materials under seal.

[...]

Given the political context, and the highly unusual action of executing a search warrant at the residence of a former President and likely future political opponent, it is essential that the public understands as soon as possible the basis for the government’s action. Any government interest in securing the identities of witnesses and confidential sources, if any, may be addressed by appropriate redactions from the search warrant affidavit.

The filing has, procedurally at least, been moved forward. The magistrate judge who approved the warrant — Bruce Reinhart, who previously helped employees of Jeffrey Epstein secure immunity deals, donated to the campaigns of Democrats and Trump opponents, and posted disparagingly about Trump on social media — has directed the Biden Department of Justice to respond to Judicial Watch's request by Monday. Notably, Reinhart's official biography page on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida website has been removed after information about the judge's past work and statements about Trump.

Advertisement

Related:

PRESIDENT TRUMP

While some expect the Department of justice to deny Judicial Watch's motion to release the warrant, such a response would still not preclude President Trump and his lawyers from releasing the warrant on their own and putting at least some of the speculation to bed for now. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement