Here's What a CNN Host Said About Tim Walz That Left Scott Jennings...
What ICE Agents Did After Eating Lunch at a Mexican Restaurant in MN...
Wait, That's How a Local Minnesota Dem Described the Leftist Violence Against ICE
Lawrence O'Donnell's Selective Outrage at Vulgarity, and Abby Phillip Gets Debunked by Abb...
Jacob Frey Cannot Get His Way
INSANITY: Mob of Leftist Rioters Stab and Beat Anti-Islam Activist in Minneapolis
U.S. Strike in Syria Kills Terrorist Linked to Murder of American Soldiers
Florida Man Convicted of $4.5M Scheme to Defraud U.S. Military Fuel Program
Chinese National Pleads Guilty to $27 Million Scam Targeting 2,000 Elderly Victims Nationw...
Orange County Man Arrested for Alleged Instagram Death Threats Against VP JD Vance
Hannity Grills Democrat Shri Thanedar After He Admits Voting Against Deporting Illegal Sex...
$68 Million Medicaid Fraud: Two Plead Guilty Over Brooklyn Adult Day Care Scheme
The Trump Administration Just Announced New Tariffs on Countries Deploying Troops to Green...
Minneapolis Alleged Gang Member, Felon Charged After Allegedly Stealing Rifle From FBI Veh...
JD Vance Just Destroyed This Indiana Republican for Failing to Act on Redistricting
Tipsheet

23 AGs Say Financial Net-Zero Goals Raise Food, Energy Costs

AP Photo/Mike Stewart

Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird, along with 22 other AGs, sent a letter demanding answers from the Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi) over its Financial Institutions Net-Zero Standard. 

Advertisement

The letter, addressed to SBTi CEO, David Kennedy, demands documents on member commitments, funding sources, and insurer actions tied to the Financial Institutions Net-Zero Standard, which may violate the law, and have harmed consumers. 

Bird posted on social media: “Making net-zero a goal actively harms Americans, creates risk for energy independence, and increases the cost of safe, healthy, nutritious food."

Specifically, the AGs argue that SBTi's Standards are unlawful and raise energy and food costs. 

The letter states: "As many of us have explained to other organizations over the last several years, it is illegal for companies and organizations to enter into agreements to limit output of goods or services. 

From engagement with Climate Action 100+ and Net Zero Alliances, the actions take similar form—companies coordinate with an organization and agree to squeeze perceived bad actors to get to “net zero” by some future date. 

And engagement with Science Based Targets Initiative (“SBTi”) is no different, Bird said. “Members who submit goals to SBTi appear to have banded together to meet the new Standard to cut off funding and insurance to the oil and gas industry...Companies cannot collude to refuse access to their services, whether they do so in a smoke-filled room or launder that collusion through a third party.” 

Advertisement

Last week, Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier launched an investigation into SBTi over potential consumer protection and antitrust violations. 

The financial net zero goals limit goods and services, Bird said in a statement. 

"SBTi is trying to redo President Biden's radical green scheme. If successful, they'll hurt farmers, energy producers, and Iowans. Their program limits output of goods or services but also net zero programs are unrealistic and harm both American agriculture and industry. Making net zero a goal actively harms Americans, creates risk for energy independence and increases the cost of safe, healthy, nutritious food." 

The climate policies hurt consumers and are possibly illegal, Will Hild, the executive director of consumers' research, said in a statement. 

"President Trump has made it extremely clear that America is unleashing American energy dominance, but the SBTi is continuing to pressure organizations into following net-zero requirements that are completely senseless and only serve to push a political agenda. Consumers’ Research fully supports the Attorneys General looking into STBi's prioritization of far-left climate standards.” 

Jason Isaac, the CEO of the American Energy Institute, compared the climate rules to "climate cartels."

"SBTi’s financial standards aren’t just unrealistic, they’re potentially illegal, coordinating global firms to cut off essential industries from capital and insurance. These actions drive up energy and food prices for American families, all while outsourcing control to foreign NGOs and U.N.-backed pressure groups. Americans aren’t going to sit back while unelected activists dictate economic policy from across the Atlantic." 

Advertisement

LIST OF SIGNATORIES ON THE LETTER (23 states): 

  • Brenna Bird, Iowa (LEAD) 
  • Steve Marshall, Alabama 
  • Treg Taylor, Alaska 
  • Tim Griffin, Arkansas 
  • James Uthmeier, Florida 
  • Chris Carr, Georgia 
  • Raúl Labrador, Idaho 
  • Todd Rokita, Indiana 
  • Kris Kobach, Kansas 
  • Liz Murrill, Louisiana 
  • Lynn Fitch, Mississippi 
  • Andrew Bailey, Missouri 
  • Austin Knudsen, Montana 
  • Mike Hilgers, Nebraska 
  • Drew Wrigley, North Dakota 
  • Gentner Drummond, Oklahoma 
  • Alan Wilson, South Carolina 
  • Marty Jackley, South Dakota 
  • Jonathan Skrmetti, Tennessee 
  • Ken Paxton, Texas 
  • Jason Miyares, Virginia 
  • John McCuskey, West Virginia 
  • Bridget Hill, Wyoming

Editor’s NoteDo you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join Townhall VIP and use the promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement