This City Councilman Turned a $50K Deal Into a Personal Payday. Now He's...
Meet the Conservative Outsider Who Wants to Bring Common Sense Back to His...
How This Small-Town Police Force Became a 'Criminal Organization'
Iranian Regime's Latest Move Shows How Desperate It Has Become
CBS News Tried to Recalibrate Detention Stats — DHS Was Having None of...
If 'The Only Thing More Powerful Than Hate Is Love' Democrats Missed the...
Elites Did Their Part to Fight Global Warming by Flying Dozens of Private...
Man Who Pushed Propaganda About a Young Gazan Boy Slaughtered By The IDF...
Harry Sisson Refuses to House Illegals in His Home, And Claims ICE Agent...
Critics Blast Katie Porter's Pre Super Bowl X Post As She Tries to...
Will We Reach 100 Days of Straight Liberal Content on the Apple News...
Immigration Win: Federal Court Sides With Trump Admin on TPS Terminations for Multiple...
Federal Judge Blocks California Effort to Demask ICE Agents
Jasmine Crockett Might Be Running the Most Incompetent Campaign in History
WaPo Claims That Bad Bunny's Profane Performance Represented 'Wholesome Family Values'
Tipsheet

Judge Rejects Democrat-Led Effort to Stop DOGE Access

Photo/Alex Brandon

A federal judge in Washington, D.C., has blocked an attempt to stop the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) mass firings and the restrictions on federal data access. This ruling comes as the Trump administration faces increasing opposition from bureaucrats concerned about transparency and the downsizing of government agencies. This latest legal battle further intensifies the ongoing debate over the future of government efficiency reforms under the Trump administration. 

Advertisement

On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan rejected an emergency appeal from 14 Democratic-led states seeking to block cost-reduction measures and prevent DOGE from proceeding with its restructuring plans. The states had requested a temporary restraining order, but the judge ruled against the motion, allowing the administration’s efforts to continue unimpeded. 

“Plaintiffs legitimately call into question what appears to be the unchecked authority of an unelected individual and an entity that was not created by Congress and over which it has no oversight,” she said. “In these circumstances, it must be indisputable that this court acts within the bounds of its authority. Accordingly, it cannot issue a TRO, especially one as wide-ranging as the Plaintiff's request, without clear evidence of imminent, irreparable harm to these Plaintiffs. The current record does not meet that standard.” 

She argued that the plaintiffs failed to meet the “high standard for irreparable injury.” She noted that their claims were based on media reports speculating on potential financial or programmatic harm if DOGE continues its aggressive restructuring. She likened this to Musk’s previous description of USAID as going through a “woodchipper.” 

Advertisement

Related:

DOGE

New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torrez initially filed the lawsuit. He asserted, "There is no greater threat to democracy than the accumulation of state power in the hands of a single, unelected individual.” 

The lawsuit also involved attorney generals from Arizona, California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement