Trump and Hegseth's Major Announcement Did Not Disappoint
What a Custodian Just Revealed Adds More Intrigue About the Brown University Shooting
FINALLY: The Trump DOJ Suing DC Over Its Obnoxious Gun Laws
This Man Was Filmed Stealing an ICE Vehicle – the Jury Just Issued...
Lawmakers Seek Inherent Contempt Charges Against Pam Bondi
US in Hot Pursuit of Another Venezuelan Oil Tanker
The Coldplay Kiss Cam Didn’t Ruin Her Life. Bad Choices Did
The Democrats' Human Rights Fallacy
Operation Relentless Justice Cracks Down on Violent Crime Against Children
JD Vance Has Two Words for Neo-Nazi Nick Fuentes
Minnesota AG Brags About Stopping Scammers As the State Reels From $9 Billion...
Trump Administration Terminates Offshore Wind Farms Over National Security Concerns
Guess Who Was Named ‘Antisemite of the Year’
Australian PM Apologizes to Jewish Community After Being Booed at Bondi Beach Vigil
Sarah Huckabee Sanders Defends Christ Ahead of Christmas
Tipsheet

Judge Rejects Democrat-Led Effort to Stop DOGE Access

Photo/Alex Brandon

A federal judge in Washington, D.C., has blocked an attempt to stop the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) mass firings and the restrictions on federal data access. This ruling comes as the Trump administration faces increasing opposition from bureaucrats concerned about transparency and the downsizing of government agencies. This latest legal battle further intensifies the ongoing debate over the future of government efficiency reforms under the Trump administration. 

Advertisement

On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan rejected an emergency appeal from 14 Democratic-led states seeking to block cost-reduction measures and prevent DOGE from proceeding with its restructuring plans. The states had requested a temporary restraining order, but the judge ruled against the motion, allowing the administration’s efforts to continue unimpeded. 

“Plaintiffs legitimately call into question what appears to be the unchecked authority of an unelected individual and an entity that was not created by Congress and over which it has no oversight,” she said. “In these circumstances, it must be indisputable that this court acts within the bounds of its authority. Accordingly, it cannot issue a TRO, especially one as wide-ranging as the Plaintiff's request, without clear evidence of imminent, irreparable harm to these Plaintiffs. The current record does not meet that standard.” 

She argued that the plaintiffs failed to meet the “high standard for irreparable injury.” She noted that their claims were based on media reports speculating on potential financial or programmatic harm if DOGE continues its aggressive restructuring. She likened this to Musk’s previous description of USAID as going through a “woodchipper.” 

Advertisement

Related:

DOGE

New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torrez initially filed the lawsuit. He asserted, "There is no greater threat to democracy than the accumulation of state power in the hands of a single, unelected individual.” 

The lawsuit also involved attorney generals from Arizona, California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement