Why DC's Police Commissioner Just Resigned
What Jasmine Crockett Just Said About Trump Voter Shows She's Not Serious About...
Federal Judge Issues Major Ruling in Ghislaine Maxwell Case
Nick Fuentes Seems Popular—Until You See Where His Clicks Come From
Rosie O'Donnell's Terminal Case of Trump Derangement Syndrome
Florida AG James Uthmeier Sues Medical Groups for Promoting Trans Care to Kids
Activist Judge Indira Talwani Was Just Smacked Down by the First Circuit Court...
Scott Jennings Plows Right Through Neera Tanden's Farm Bailout Lies
Check Out Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's 'No Kings' Meltdown
Classroom Segregation Is Back, This Time Enforced by a 'Gender-Nonbinary' Activist
WH Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Just Nuked Dems on the Affordability Crisis They...
Hollywood’s Diversity Bubble Pops: Half of LGBTQ TV Characters Set to Disappear Next...
Mamdani's DSA Comrade Calla Walsh Is Back and Calling for the Dismantling of...
It’s Obama’s Double-Tap
BLM Activists Ask City Officials for Police to Stop Killing Violent Individuals
Tipsheet

Judge Rejects Democrat-Led Effort to Stop DOGE Access

Photo/Alex Brandon

A federal judge in Washington, D.C., has blocked an attempt to stop the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) mass firings and the restrictions on federal data access. This ruling comes as the Trump administration faces increasing opposition from bureaucrats concerned about transparency and the downsizing of government agencies. This latest legal battle further intensifies the ongoing debate over the future of government efficiency reforms under the Trump administration. 

Advertisement

On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan rejected an emergency appeal from 14 Democratic-led states seeking to block cost-reduction measures and prevent DOGE from proceeding with its restructuring plans. The states had requested a temporary restraining order, but the judge ruled against the motion, allowing the administration’s efforts to continue unimpeded. 

“Plaintiffs legitimately call into question what appears to be the unchecked authority of an unelected individual and an entity that was not created by Congress and over which it has no oversight,” she said. “In these circumstances, it must be indisputable that this court acts within the bounds of its authority. Accordingly, it cannot issue a TRO, especially one as wide-ranging as the Plaintiff's request, without clear evidence of imminent, irreparable harm to these Plaintiffs. The current record does not meet that standard.” 

She argued that the plaintiffs failed to meet the “high standard for irreparable injury.” She noted that their claims were based on media reports speculating on potential financial or programmatic harm if DOGE continues its aggressive restructuring. She likened this to Musk’s previous description of USAID as going through a “woodchipper.” 

Advertisement

Related:

DOGE

New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torrez initially filed the lawsuit. He asserted, "There is no greater threat to democracy than the accumulation of state power in the hands of a single, unelected individual.” 

The lawsuit also involved attorney generals from Arizona, California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement