They're Scattering: Anti-ICE Leftists Consider Fleeing Country After Signal Chat Got Expos...
Here's What Schumer and Company Are Demanding to Avoid Another Government Shutdown
How the Economy Created This Disturbing New Dating Trend
Was a Washington Man Just Stabbed Because of His Christian Faith?
Tim Walz Just Got Called Out by the Holocaust Museum
Why ICE and Minnesota Dominated the Conversation Last Week — and What the...
Trump Isn’t the Problem, Europe Is
Venezuela’s Opposition Leader Says Democracy in Venezuela Could Be Trump's Berlin Wall Mom...
Top Chinese General Accused of Leaking Nuclear Secrets to the US
Scott Bessent Blasts Canadian PM Mark Carney for Cutting a Deal With China
It Looks Like Budweiser Learned Their Lesson After This New Ad Dropped
The Antifa Crossdresser Who Urged Followers to Take Up Arms Against ICE Is...
Virginia Democrats Have a New Plan on How to Lock Up Gun Owners
Another Wave of Venezuelan Gang Members Just Got Busted In an ATM Hacking...
This Texas University Got Caught Spending Millions on Foreign Labor
Tipsheet

Judge Rejects Democrat-Led Effort to Stop DOGE Access

Photo/Alex Brandon

A federal judge in Washington, D.C., has blocked an attempt to stop the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) mass firings and the restrictions on federal data access. This ruling comes as the Trump administration faces increasing opposition from bureaucrats concerned about transparency and the downsizing of government agencies. This latest legal battle further intensifies the ongoing debate over the future of government efficiency reforms under the Trump administration. 

Advertisement

On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan rejected an emergency appeal from 14 Democratic-led states seeking to block cost-reduction measures and prevent DOGE from proceeding with its restructuring plans. The states had requested a temporary restraining order, but the judge ruled against the motion, allowing the administration’s efforts to continue unimpeded. 

“Plaintiffs legitimately call into question what appears to be the unchecked authority of an unelected individual and an entity that was not created by Congress and over which it has no oversight,” she said. “In these circumstances, it must be indisputable that this court acts within the bounds of its authority. Accordingly, it cannot issue a TRO, especially one as wide-ranging as the Plaintiff's request, without clear evidence of imminent, irreparable harm to these Plaintiffs. The current record does not meet that standard.” 

She argued that the plaintiffs failed to meet the “high standard for irreparable injury.” She noted that their claims were based on media reports speculating on potential financial or programmatic harm if DOGE continues its aggressive restructuring. She likened this to Musk’s previous description of USAID as going through a “woodchipper.” 

Advertisement

Related:

DOGE

New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torrez initially filed the lawsuit. He asserted, "There is no greater threat to democracy than the accumulation of state power in the hands of a single, unelected individual.” 

The lawsuit also involved attorney generals from Arizona, California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement