Tom Homan Just Found a New Use For Rikers Island
MAHA Is Off and Running With New Directives
This Abraham Accords Country Is Open to Trump's Gaza Plan
Lord Save Us: Ilhan Omar Is Eying Minnesota's Now-Open Senate Seat in 2026
A Reporter Got Quite the Answer for Why Massachusetts Keeps Releasing Illegals Charged...
'He Shouldn't Have Said That': Trump Takes a Swipe at Biden While Discussing...
These Hyperpartisan Democratic Senators Have Opposed Almost All of Trump's Nominees
Tough Week for The NY Times, As Its Claims of No Evidence From...
800,000 Non-Citizens Could Be Voting In NYC's Next Election
Trump Issues Kaitlan Collins a Key Reminder From the Oval Office
Trump's Lawsuit Against CBS News Gets Much Worse for Network As Judge Refuses...
Scott Jennings Takes Down Brian Stelter for Ridiculous Point on Biden's Transparency
Here’s Where Harris Stands in New 2028 Polls
NYC Non-Citizen Voting Plan a Power Grab, Councilman Says
Pro-USAID Protestors Tried to Crash a House Hearing. Then They Got Schooled on...
Tipsheet

Judge Squashes Alvin Bragg's Ridiculous Restraining Order Request Against Jim Jordan

AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais

A federal New York judge declined Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's restraining order request against the House Committee Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) chairman. 

Advertisement

Earlier this month, Bragg filed a complaint and a motion for a Temporary Restraining Order against Jordan to prevent the House from issuing a subpoena so that they could investigate the handling of former President Trump's indictment. 

Instead, the judge ordered Bragg to send material to Jordan by 9 p.m. Tuesday so the court could have a hearing on the situation on April 19.

According to court documents, Bragg said this was in "response to an unprecedentedly brazen and unconstitutional attack by members of Congress."

The Democrat's lawyers want to block the subpoena of Mark Pomerantz, who led the investigation into Trump for the woke DA before he resigned over disagreements with Bragg. They claim that "Congress has no power to supervise state criminal prosecution" and that Jordan's investigation was unconstitutional and outside his congressional duties. 

"Chairman Jordan's demands, including his subpoena to Mr. Pomerantz, seek highly sensitive and confidential local prosecutorial information that belongs to the Office of the District Attorney and the People of New York," the lawsuit read. "Basic principles of federalism and common sense, as well as binding Supreme Court precedent, forbid Congress from demanding it."

Advertisement

The lawsuit also seeks to prevent future subpoenas from Jordan and other House Republicans. 

According to the judge, Bragg did not meet the standard for a preliminary injunction, and the balance of harms weighed against granting the request. The judge also voted in favor of Jordan, arguing that he had a legitimate legislative purpose for wanting the documents. 

The committee has been investigating Bragg's office, sending requests and subpoenas for documents and testimony from people who are connected to Bragg as his political persecution of Trump continues. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement