What a CNN Host Said About Tim Walz Left Scott Jenning's Truly Aghast
How These ICE Agents Nabbed These Illegals Was Diabolically Hilarious
INSANE: MN State Senator Says Attacks on ICE Agents Only Shows That Locals...
Biden-Appointed Judge Issues Insane Ruling on How ICE Should Handle Deranged MN Protesters
There Is No Law in the Jungle—or in American Cities, Either, Thanks to...
How China Sold America the Wind Turbine Scam
Food Wars
It’s Not a Wonderful Day in the Neighborhood: Criminal Monsters of Minneapolis
Israel’s October 7 Wartime Heroes, Both Celebrated and Unsung
The Highs and Lows of Nepalese-Israeli Relations
Industrial-Scale Fraud: How Government Spending Became a Cash Machine for Criminals
The World Prosperity Forum vs. World Economic Forum
Trump’s Fix for Breaking Healthcare’s Black Box
Democrats: All Opposition, No Positions
Wars Are Won by Defending Home First
Tipsheet

Surprise, Surprise: White House Won't Even Discuss Whether AG Garland Committed Perjury

AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta

It's been a rather busy few days for the Biden administration's Department of Justice (DOJ), especially when it comes to damning revelations that Attorney General Merrick Garland and David Weiss, the U.S. Attorney assigned to the Hunter Biden case, may have colluded to mislead Congress. The White House looks to be as tight-lipped as possible about taking any questions on the matter, as evidenced by Tuesday's press briefing

Advertisement

To recap, there has been a conflicting back-and-forth between Garland and Weiss as to if the latter had full authority to charge Hunter Biden. Weiss, according to IRS whistleblower Gary Shapley, had told several people that he did not have the authority to charge in other districts and was requesting special counsel status. Garland, however, said that Weiss did have that authority. 

Then, on Monday, it was revealed that Weiss had told the House Judiciary Committee in a June 7 letter that he did have the full authority. He was answering a letter from last month sent from the committee to Garland. 

All of these details raise questions, except that they're questions the White House won't answer. Towards the very end of the press briefing, a reporter asked Principal Deputy Press Secretary Olivia Dalton for a "follow up on last week," which is understandable, as more information seems to be coming out by the hour that shows the Biden administration and the first family in a damning light. 

"Does the White House believe Attorney General Garland committed perjury when he testified under oath that Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss could bring charges outside of his district," the reporter went on to ask. Dalton not only said "I don't have any comment on this," shooting down the question, but she refused to take any more questions from that reporter, instead making it clear she was "moving on."

Advertisement

Related:

CORRUPTION

Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) of the House Judiciary Committee, certainly has questions. He sent another letter, this time to Weiss, on June 22, demanding answers to questions that in part ask who helped him write that letter on Garland's behalf. 

It also looks like Garland himself will have to answer to Jordan and his committee. NBC News reported on Tuesday afternoon that the attorney general is scheduled to testify on September 20, noting that "two sources familiar with the matter confirmed" to the outlet. 

Predictably, NBC News noted that the DOJ "declined to comment on the upcoming hearing."

Advertisement

In a tweet from Sunday, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) expressed an openness to impeaching Garland. He doubled down in a tweet from earlier on Tuesday. 

Larry O'Connor laid out the case for impeachment perfectly in a column from earlier on Tuesday.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement