You Can’t Out-MAGA Donald Trump
Democrats and the Stench of Desperation
Everyone's in on It
Intersectionality and Abandoned Leadership Is Killing the Democrats
Accountability, the New Political Buzzword
Stop the Harmful Time-Changing Ritual
Kitchen-Table Politics: Why Prescription Drug Costs Could Decide the Midterms
Man Arrested for Allegedly Stealing Veteran’s Identity and Using VA Health Care for...
Seventh U.S. Service Member Killed in Operation Epic Fury
NYPD Investigates Suspicious Device in Manhattan Vehicle After Apparent Terror Plot
NYPD Confirms Real IED Thrown at Protest Crowd
Federal Judge Voids Voice of America Layoffs
Trump Says He Won't Sign Any New Legislation Until the SAVE Act Is...
Former Carlyle Police Chief Accused of Spending Taxpayer Monday on WNBA Tickets, Jewelry
Chicago-Area Convenience Store Owner Sentenced to 4 Years in WIC Fraud Scheme
Tipsheet

Elise Stefanik Responds to 'Sexist' Blog Post Mocking Her as 'Childless'

Elise Stefanik Responds to 'Sexist' Blog Post Mocking Her as 'Childless'
Greg Nash/Pool via AP

Congresswoman Elise Stefanik (R-NY) responded to a now-deleted blog post in a local New York newspaper that ridiculed her as “childless.” Two writers for the Albany Times Union, Peter Marino and Lale Davidson, took aim at Stefanik as a “rising star” in the Republican Party in an attempted satirical account of Stefanik interacting with children. 

Advertisement

"I myself am childless because I am a rising star in the Republican Party, and family planning is possible by way of the contraception paid for by my excellent taxpayer-provided healthcare plan," the pair wrote in the fictional account of Stefanik speaking to children.

In a joint statement with her husband, Stefanik is demanding a retraction of the sexist publication.

"As a young couple, we have developed a thick skin over many years as we have become accustomed to repeated sexist smears in media coverage. However, the Times Union’s decision to publish an article that mocked us as ‘childless’ is a new low and is truly heinous and wildly inappropriate is truly heinous and wildly inappropriate. The shameful statement is not only inherently sexist, but also hateful, abusive, and heartless,” the couple wrote in a statement. “The Times Union publisher, editors, and staff have clearly let the paper’s standards sink so low that they have chosen to embrace sexist scum and content under the masthead. They should be ashamed. We not only require a complete retraction, but we also demand an immediate public apology and explanation as to how this was allowed to be published in the Times Union and who will be held responsible and accountable.”

Advertisement

The paper has yet to issue an apology to Stefanik.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement