Kash Patel Did What? Did The Atlantic Publish Another Fake News Piece Again?
Good News: These Two Supreme Court Justices Are NOT Retiring
I'm Sure Republicans Were Happy to Hear This News Regarding Their 2026 Midterm...
Watch CNBC's Joe Kernen Wreck Hakeem Jeffries' Anti-Trump Talking Points Over the Economy
The Dems' Virginia Redistricting Push Still in Limbo As Election Day Nears
Look at Scott Jennings' Face When Kamala Harris Former Comms Director Said This...
Colorado's Religious Freedom Is a Rocky Mountain Lie
My Ancestor Fought for Islam at the Battle of the Alamo?
You Don't Have to Agree With Me Politically to Work Here
Misguided ‘Repair the World’ Climate Philanthropy
Deplorable Democrat Lawfare Just Came for This Trump Attorney
The End of the Charade: IOC Enforces Biology in Women's Sports and Restores...
Get to the Root of America’s Health Crisis: Start With Food in Hospitals
Crime, Depression, and What to Do About It
Fix the Problem, Not the Blame
Tipsheet

Sen. Hawley: Future SCOTUS Nominees Must Believe Roe v. Wade Was 'Wrongfully Decided'

Sen. Hawley: Future SCOTUS Nominees Must Believe Roe v. Wade Was 'Wrongfully Decided'
Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool via AP

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) drew a red line for his future support of Supreme Court nominees, as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Sen. Hawley told The Washington Post that going forward, he would exclusively support nominees that firmly believe that the landmark 1973 Supreme Court ruling Roe v. Wade was “wrongfully decided.” The Missouri Republican said that such a stance on the abortion ruling should  predate a nominee’s candidacy, and must be “explicitly acknowledged” on the record.

Advertisement

“I don’t want private assurances from candidates. I don’t want to hear about their personal views, one way or another. I’m not looking for forecasts about how they may vote in the future or predictions,” Sen. Hawley told WaPo. “I don’t want any of that. I want to see on the record, as part of their record, that they have acknowledged in some forum that Roe v. Wade, as a legal matter, is wrongly decided.”

Sen. Hawley’s new mantra comes after the Supreme Court struck down a Louisiana law that would require those who perform abortions to obtain admitting privileges to local hospitals. The high court upheld previous precedent from Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, but the ruling authored by Justice Breyer is seen as a setback for the pro-life movement. Sen. Hawley said that his commitment to only supporting jurists who oppose Roe v. Wade on a legal basis transcends the party identification of the president who nominates judges:

“If there is no indication in their record that at any time they have acknowledged that Roe was wrong at the time it was decided, then I’m not going to vote for them — and I don’t care who nominates them,” he told WaPo.

Advertisement

Judicial nominees represent a huge aspect of President Trump’s first term in office, with 200 federal judges confirmed to lifetime appointments thus far, along with two Supreme Court justices. Sen. Hawley’s red line is the first of its kind from Senate Republicans, as the possibility of a Supreme Court vacancy looms.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos