We've Seized a Venezuelan Oil Tanker
Jasmine Crockett Really Thinks She Can Mamdani Her Way Into the Senate
Trust Science? Yes. Trust the Left? Never Again
The Last Decent Democrat? John Fetterman Scolds His Side for Vile Attacks on...
Innocent Venezuelan Fishermen: 'Hands Up! Don't Shoot!'
Foreign Flags on US Soil: Vermont School Raises Somali Flag in Solidarity
Trump Exposing Somali Fraud and Illegal Immigration Deemed 'Authoritarian' by Somali Democ...
Jim Acosta Claims President Trump Is Growing Tired...There's Just One Problem
What Do We Do About China?
Houston Firm Owner Pleads Guilty as U.S. Seizes $50M in Illicit Nvidia AI...
Crypto Platform Paxful to Pay $4 Million After Admitting It Enabled Illicit Trades,...
DOJ Sues Minneapolis Public Schools Over Race-and Sex-Based Teacher Preferences
U.S. House Approves $900B National Defense Authorization Act
Former Oil Trader Gets 15 Months for Bribery Scheme Targeting Petrobras Officials
Ex-Compton Official Admits to Paying Bribes for Marijuana Permit Votes, Committing Tax Eva...
Tipsheet

Sen. Hawley: Future SCOTUS Nominees Must Believe Roe v. Wade Was 'Wrongfully Decided'

Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool via AP

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) drew a red line for his future support of Supreme Court nominees, as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Sen. Hawley told The Washington Post that going forward, he would exclusively support nominees that firmly believe that the landmark 1973 Supreme Court ruling Roe v. Wade was “wrongfully decided.” The Missouri Republican said that such a stance on the abortion ruling should  predate a nominee’s candidacy, and must be “explicitly acknowledged” on the record.

Advertisement

“I don’t want private assurances from candidates. I don’t want to hear about their personal views, one way or another. I’m not looking for forecasts about how they may vote in the future or predictions,” Sen. Hawley told WaPo. “I don’t want any of that. I want to see on the record, as part of their record, that they have acknowledged in some forum that Roe v. Wade, as a legal matter, is wrongly decided.”

Sen. Hawley’s new mantra comes after the Supreme Court struck down a Louisiana law that would require those who perform abortions to obtain admitting privileges to local hospitals. The high court upheld previous precedent from Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, but the ruling authored by Justice Breyer is seen as a setback for the pro-life movement. Sen. Hawley said that his commitment to only supporting jurists who oppose Roe v. Wade on a legal basis transcends the party identification of the president who nominates judges:

“If there is no indication in their record that at any time they have acknowledged that Roe was wrong at the time it was decided, then I’m not going to vote for them — and I don’t care who nominates them,” he told WaPo.

Advertisement

Judicial nominees represent a huge aspect of President Trump’s first term in office, with 200 federal judges confirmed to lifetime appointments thus far, along with two Supreme Court justices. Sen. Hawley’s red line is the first of its kind from Senate Republicans, as the possibility of a Supreme Court vacancy looms.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement