The GOP’s Midterm Reversal of Fortune
When Rich Liberals Beg
Social Security Is Earned—and Washington Must Protect It
There Are Enemies and Then There Are Enemies
Book Review: Douglas Brunt’s The Lost Empire of Emanuel Nobel
Where Eagles Dare
Louisiana Voters Reject Cassidy and His Costly Healthcare Policies
Bay Area Report on ICE Raids Is Peak Elite Cope
Dear Mr. President, the (College) Kids Are Not Alright
Weaponizing Children: Teachers' Unions Cancelling Class for Political Protest
From South Lebanon to Israel — A Childhood Shaped by War, Identity,...
Brothers From Ghana Among Three Charged in Online Romance Scam Targeting Seniors
10 Shootings Rock South Austin; 2 Suspects in Custody, 1 Still at Large
The White House Issues a Powerful Message of Prayer in Celebration of Rededication...
All of the Worst People Are Coming Out to Support Thomas Massie
Tipsheet

Sen. Hawley: Future SCOTUS Nominees Must Believe Roe v. Wade Was 'Wrongfully Decided'

Sen. Hawley: Future SCOTUS Nominees Must Believe Roe v. Wade Was 'Wrongfully Decided'
Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool via AP

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) drew a red line for his future support of Supreme Court nominees, as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Sen. Hawley told The Washington Post that going forward, he would exclusively support nominees that firmly believe that the landmark 1973 Supreme Court ruling Roe v. Wade was “wrongfully decided.” The Missouri Republican said that such a stance on the abortion ruling should  predate a nominee’s candidacy, and must be “explicitly acknowledged” on the record.

Advertisement

“I don’t want private assurances from candidates. I don’t want to hear about their personal views, one way or another. I’m not looking for forecasts about how they may vote in the future or predictions,” Sen. Hawley told WaPo. “I don’t want any of that. I want to see on the record, as part of their record, that they have acknowledged in some forum that Roe v. Wade, as a legal matter, is wrongly decided.”

Sen. Hawley’s new mantra comes after the Supreme Court struck down a Louisiana law that would require those who perform abortions to obtain admitting privileges to local hospitals. The high court upheld previous precedent from Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, but the ruling authored by Justice Breyer is seen as a setback for the pro-life movement. Sen. Hawley said that his commitment to only supporting jurists who oppose Roe v. Wade on a legal basis transcends the party identification of the president who nominates judges:

“If there is no indication in their record that at any time they have acknowledged that Roe was wrong at the time it was decided, then I’m not going to vote for them — and I don’t care who nominates them,” he told WaPo.

Advertisement

Judicial nominees represent a huge aspect of President Trump’s first term in office, with 200 federal judges confirmed to lifetime appointments thus far, along with two Supreme Court justices. Sen. Hawley’s red line is the first of its kind from Senate Republicans, as the possibility of a Supreme Court vacancy looms.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement