Oh, So That's Why DOJ Isn't Going After Pro-Terrorism Agitators
The UN Endorses a Second Terrorist State for Iran
Jihad Joe
Israeli Ambassador Shreds the U.N. Charter in Powerful Speech Before Vote to Grant...
New Single Article of Impeachment Filed Against Biden
GOP Reps Sound the Alarm Over Foreign Entities Using ESG to Undermine American...
New Report Details How Dems Are Planning to Minimize Risk of Pro-Hamas Disruptions...
The Long Haul of Love
Joe Biden's Weapons 'Pause' Will Get More Israeli Soldiers, Civilians Killed
Left-Wing Mayor Hires Drag Queen to Spearhead 'Transgender Initiatives'
NewsNation Border Patrol Ride Along Sees Arrest of Illegal Immigrants in Illustration of...
One State Just Cut Off Funding for Planned Parenthood
Vulnerable Democratic Senators Refuse to Support Commonsense Pro-Life Bill
California Surf Competition Will Be Required to Allow Men to Compete Against Women
MSNBC Left Sputtering Over Poll's Findings on Who Independent Voters Worry Will 'Weaken...
Tipsheet

A 'Victimless Offense:' Ossoff Mirrors Biden's Rhetoric on Decriminalizing Driving Under the Influence

AP Photo/David Goldman

Georgia Senate hopeful Jon Ossoff took a radical stance on drunk driving as a crime in the wake of the death of Rayshard Brooks, who was detained for driving under the influence and later shot and killed by Atlanta police officers. In a radio interview with Georgia radio host Dean Obeidallah, Ossoff claimed that Brooks committed a “victimless crime,” and that the law enforcement officers’ lives were not in danger.

Advertisement

“This was a man who was detained for a victimless offense. He was asleep in a car at a drive-thru,” Ossoff said. “He didn’t have a deadly weapon, there wasn’t an officer’s life at risk, and he [Brooks] shouldn’t have died.”

While Brooks’ death was tragic, to insinuate that the responding officers’ lives were not at risk is dishonest. Upon failing the breathalyzer test, the encounter turned into a struggle that ultimately led Brooks to seize an officer’s taser. Though Brooks was originally cooperative, the escalation was far from “victimless,” and the reaction from law enforcement was righteous. 

Aside from Brooks’ eventual violent reaction, driving under the influence in and of itself is responsible for 10,000 deaths per year, on average. So while Brooks was originally cooperative, driving under the influence is a serious crime that should be treated as such, and is hardly a “victimless offense,” as Ossoff claims.

The Georgia Democrat’s sympathy toward drunk drivers mirrors rhetoric from Joe Biden, who said recently that he “doesn’t count” drunk driving as a felony. 

Advertisement

Both Ossoff and Biden would be hard-pressed to take such an apologetic stance toward driving under the influence as a crime if asked by voters who have lost a loved one to a drunk driver. Indeed, while Brooks’ death is unfortunate, escalating a situation with law enforcement in which officers feel their life is threatened does not make Brooks the victim of wrongdoing by law enforcement. Ossoff, and a growing number of Democrats in the mainstream, continue to take anti-law enforcement stances in order to appease the progressive left, but treating driving under the influence as the selfish crime it is should not be a partisan issue.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement