Why is Kamala Picking a Fight With DeSantis?
Kamala Just Gave the Wrong Answer on The View
Biden Has Cancelled His International Trip
Joe Biden Keeps Wrecking Kamala's Media Days
There Is a Patriotic Energy
Wait, Trump Is Beating Kamala...With Arab Americans?
How Is Anyone Backing Kamala?
Prepare for Insane Media Spin on Ghost Gun Case Before Supreme Court
Here's What Biden Had to Say About His Call With DeSantis Ahead of...
Dozens of Illegals Were Caught Trying to Sneak Into the US. Guess Where...
Kamala: 'Look at My Career to Know What I Care About'
Walz Offers Yet Another Excuse for His Lies
October 7 Was an American Calamity
Hurricane Aftermath Raises Election Strategy Suspicion
Mayorkas Was Questioned If FEMA Has Enough Resources for Hurricane Milton. Here's What...
Tipsheet

E-Voting Adds Suspicion to Russia's Fake Referendum on Putin

(Alexei Nikolsky, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP)

Russia’s popular vote on proposed constitutional amendments resulted in overwhelming support, but the characteristics of the voting procedure remain unclear. With all of Russia’s major legislative and judicial bodies having already predicated approval, critics contend that the nationwide affirmation amounts to little more than a democratic façade.

Advertisement

Russian President Vladimir Putin expressed gratitude for the people’s support. 

“I have said many times that it was necessary to adopt amendments to Russia’s basic law, the Constitution. Here we have the improvement of the political system as well as social guarantees, strengthening of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and, finally, our spiritual, historical and moral values that link our generations,” he said. 

Voter turnout reached 68 percent, according to official data, with 77.92 percent of voters endorsing the proposed amendments. The Guardian reports that just over half of people in the Nenet autonomous region opposed the amendments, rendering Nenets the only one of Russia’s 85 political divisions to do so.

Nevertheless, Putin’s spokesman called the vote “a triumphal referendum on confidence in President Putin.”

Arkady Lyubarev, an analyst at Golos, Russia's independent election watchdog, writes that “Russian law guarantees quite extensive rights to citizens participating in a referendum, and the public is now being denied those rights.” 

Instead, Russian officials are calling the decision a “nationwide vote,” a term that has no constitutional definition. 

The Kremlin’s abuses of the constitutional procedure for introducing amendments via popular vote include presenting a fixed package of changes, precluding opportunity for citizens to indicate support or opposition to individual clauses.

Advertisement

A preliminary report by Golos found 682 instances of violations during the early voting period, but the Kremlin denied the allegations.

Moscow and the Nizhny Novgorod region achieved permissions allowing residents to vote electronically, using the same system a French cryptographer hacked within 20 minutes during Moscow’s 2019 municipal elections.

Contributors at Meduza experimented with the blockchain-based system and found that voters or third parties could potentially decrypt their own votes. Meduza noted that, while the technology could allow individuals to verify the accuracy of official election results, third parties, from companies to municipal leaders, could also exploit it to coerce voter participation. 

“It’s hard to believe that Moscow will conduct e-voting in a way that all voters could trust its results,” Vasily Vaisenberg, an expert at the Golos vote-monitoring NGO, told Kommersant.

A reward scheme has to attract voters already been employed.

Moscow’s Department of Information Technology reportedly tracked the number of government employees who registered to vote in the July 1 pseudo-referendum. E-voting results showed 62.33 percent of voters in Moscow supported the amendments.

Among the proposed amendments, many of which are centered around political and social conservatism, is a provision abolishing presidential term limits. When asked about his plans for 2024 in an interview sponsored by the Kremlin, Putin said he had no answer but would allow the people to decide his future.

Advertisement

Elites may have concerns, he said, but “the matter of principle is the attitude of the vast majority of citizens. It is a matter of trust, of course.”

Some have accused Putin, who is currently serving his fourth presidential term despite a two-term limit in the Russian constitution, of attempting to appropriate absolute power. 

“I’m not a Tsar,” he said. “A Tsar just sits there…I do not reign. I work all day.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement