Why Tulsi Gabbard Fired These Top DNI Staffers
James Comey Found This on His 'Beach Walk.' The Man Needs Help.
Here's What Shocked Biden Officials During Trump's Middle East Trip.
Trump Reclaims the Middle East: A President Who Makes Peace by Strength
The Real first 100 Days
Jake Tapper Ignores Prior Hit on Biden Reporters, and Alex Thompson Defends Their...
The Marx-Jihad Fusion: More Dangerous Together Than Either Parent
End the 'Nationwide' Injunction Racket Once and for All
Democrats and Journalists Still Avoid Biden's Decline
Planned Parenthood kills people. Lots of them.
My Father’s Horrific Murder Has Haunted Our Family for Generations. It's Time for...
Trump's Revolutionary Approach to the Middle East
On Education, Mississippi Shows the Way
President Trump’s Bold Action for HBCUs Is a Win for the American Dream
Congress Should Restore Full Interest Deductibility in the Tax Code
Tipsheet

Chair of Judiciary Committee Defends Constitutional Merits of Obamacare

The very same representative who once famously asked "What good is reading the [health care] bill?" is now defending the measure against claims that Obamacare is unconstitutional.  With his infinite wisdom, Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., chairman of the House
Advertisement
Judiciary Committee, defended the constitutional merits of Obamacare on the grounds of the "good and welfare clause" and "a couple others."

Hmmm... I'm not familiar with the "good and welfare" clause.  But Rep. Conyers assures us it's legit because "scholars" he knows say so:   



Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement