The Libertarians Are Back at It Again
Is the Panic About Iran Political, Practical, or Even Real?
The Press in Its Coverage of the NYC Protest Attack, and Now Who...
For the Love of the Game, for the Love of Country
Using Religion to Win Votes
A Total Disgrace
Senate’s Inaction on the Save America Act Cannot Be Ignored
Reviving America’s Dying Sense of Humor
Epic Fury Is Legal and it Is America First
For Saudi Arabia and the U.S., Friendship Requires Accountability Over Past Harms
Texas Shooter Exposes Huge Blind Spots in Immigration Vetting
Trump Promises 'Death, Fire, and Fury' Should Iran Interfere With Oil Transportation
AI Slop Has Dominated the Operation Epic Fury Information Landscape
A New Poll Just Dropped in the GOP Texas Senate Primary. What Does...
Rep. Andy Ogles Is Angering All of the Right People
Tipsheet

Liberal Fox News Host Proves She Did Not Read Any of the Key Docs Released by Tulsi Gabbard

Liberal Fox News Host Proves She Did Not Read Any of the Key Docs Released by Tulsi Gabbard
AP Photo/Alex Brandon

On Thursday night, liberal Fox News host Jessica Tarlov once again had a meltdown over the Russian collusion hoax. She obviously didn’t read any of the documents released by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. On The Five, co-host Jesse Watters poked the bear, asking if Tarlov knew that these documents exposed that Vladimir Putin didn’t really care who won, never devoted resources toward tilting the 2016 race in Donald Trump’s favor in the manner expounded upon incessantly by the liberal pundit class. Tarlov said that wasn’t true, which led to the panel getting heated:

Advertisement

The documents are there. It all adds up, even if you don’t like what it adds up to, liberals. It was only after Barack Obama ordered a new Intelligence Community Assessment that the mythology behind the Russian collusion was injected into the national debate. There’s next to no evidence, and we know that because Brennan’s role in this mess has been fully exposed, one where he might be facing charges for knowingly weaponizing false intelligence against a duly elected president.  

RealClearInvestigation’s Paul Sperry has more

The Obama intelligence community’s claim that Russian President Vladimir Putin authorized dirty tricks to try and help Donald Trump win the 2016 election was based on "one scant, unclear and unverifiable fragment of a sentence from one of the substandard [intelligence] reports," according to a just-declassified report that had been locked away in a CIA vault. 

Nevertheless, former CIA Director John Brennan ordered agency analysts to use the claim in the Intelligence Community Assessment issued during the Obama administration’s final days – even though the ICA itself noted that how the information on Putin's plans was obtained was “not explicitly clear.” 

A 46-page report by the House of Representatives released Wednesday found that the source of the claim about Putin – reportedly a Russian defector living in Northern Virginia described as “anti-Trump” – merely speculated to Brennan about something he had been told by somebody else: namely, that Putin was "counting on" Trump winning. 

[…] 

The report then drops a bombshell: "The ICA judgment on Putin's thoughts about helping candidate Trump does not stand if [Brennan's] single interpretation of the fragment [from the tip that Putin was 'counting on' Trump winning] is wrong, because there is no other intelligence corroborating it." 

Advertisement

This game is over. Democrats lost, but now the accountability part comes into play. Will the GOP have the courage to issue warrants for those involved, even Barack Obama? They should, because that’s what’s required now. 

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement