The Suspect in the J6 Pipe Bombing Incident Has Been Captured. Why the...
A Newsom Nihilist Nomination?
The Importance of Being Earnest
Media Make 'Venezuelan Fishermen' the New 'Maryland Father,' and Covering Up the Minnesota...
New Mexico Democrats Push Bill Based on Results of Idiotic Study
Israeli Prime Minister Says He'll Happily Visit NYC Despite Mamdani's Threat to Uphold...
Climate Study That Shaped Global Policy Retracted After Major Error
Inside a Secret Transgender Health Conference: Clinicians Admit They're All Just 'Winging...
U.S. Secret Service Seized 16 Illegal Skimmers, Stopped $16M in Fraud
Two Men Charged After 1,585 Pounds of Meth Found Hidden in Blackberry Shipments...
SCOTUS Upholds New Texas Redistricting Map
Georgia CEO Gets Eight Years for Bribery Scheme Involving Honduran Police Contracts
Appeals Court Grants Administrative Stay to Keep National Guard in D.C.
Santa Monica Doctor Gets 30 Months for Illegally Supplying Ketamine to Actor Matthew...
The Day a Mall Became a Stage for a Hate Movement
Tipsheet

Liberal Fox News Host Proves She Did Not Read Any of the Key Docs Released by Tulsi Gabbard

AP Photo/Alex Brandon

On Thursday night, liberal Fox News host Jessica Tarlov once again had a meltdown over the Russian collusion hoax. She obviously didn’t read any of the documents released by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. On The Five, co-host Jesse Watters poked the bear, asking if Tarlov knew that these documents exposed that Vladimir Putin didn’t really care who won, never devoted resources toward tilting the 2016 race in Donald Trump’s favor in the manner expounded upon incessantly by the liberal pundit class. Tarlov said that wasn’t true, which led to the panel getting heated:

Advertisement

The documents are there. It all adds up, even if you don’t like what it adds up to, liberals. It was only after Barack Obama ordered a new Intelligence Community Assessment that the mythology behind the Russian collusion was injected into the national debate. There’s next to no evidence, and we know that because Brennan’s role in this mess has been fully exposed, one where he might be facing charges for knowingly weaponizing false intelligence against a duly elected president.  

RealClearInvestigation’s Paul Sperry has more

The Obama intelligence community’s claim that Russian President Vladimir Putin authorized dirty tricks to try and help Donald Trump win the 2016 election was based on "one scant, unclear and unverifiable fragment of a sentence from one of the substandard [intelligence] reports," according to a just-declassified report that had been locked away in a CIA vault. 

Nevertheless, former CIA Director John Brennan ordered agency analysts to use the claim in the Intelligence Community Assessment issued during the Obama administration’s final days – even though the ICA itself noted that how the information on Putin's plans was obtained was “not explicitly clear.” 

A 46-page report by the House of Representatives released Wednesday found that the source of the claim about Putin – reportedly a Russian defector living in Northern Virginia described as “anti-Trump” – merely speculated to Brennan about something he had been told by somebody else: namely, that Putin was "counting on" Trump winning. 

[…] 

The report then drops a bombshell: "The ICA judgment on Putin's thoughts about helping candidate Trump does not stand if [Brennan's] single interpretation of the fragment [from the tip that Putin was 'counting on' Trump winning] is wrong, because there is no other intelligence corroborating it." 

Advertisement

This game is over. Democrats lost, but now the accountability part comes into play. Will the GOP have the courage to issue warrants for those involved, even Barack Obama? They should, because that’s what’s required now. 

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement