The Left Were Absolute Psychopaths Following the Attack on the WHCA Dinner
WHCA Dinner Shooter Revealed Who He Was Targeting During His Attempt to Storm...
As Trump Responds to the WHCA Dinner Attack, a Lot of New Details...
Is This the WHCA Dinner Shooter? If So, He's a Kamala Harris Supporter
President Trump Was Just Escorted Out Of the WHCA Dinner
Democrats Have Always Created Racism and Always Will
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 317: What the Bible says about Blood –...
The 'No Kings' Movement Is Sheer Hypocrisy
Yeah, They Really Do Hate America
We Need a Second Fox-Like TV Network
Special Rights: The Quiet Assault on Equal Justice
St. Louis Woman Sentenced to 3 Years for Stealing $2.3M From Children's Meal...
Man Charged With Running Illegal Alien Harboring Scheme Through Japanese Steakhouse Chain...
SPLC Indictment Threatens to Derail Benson's Run for Michigan Governor
Two Officers Shot in Chicago Hospital Shooting
Tipsheet

Things Got Very Heated Between Sen. Kennedy and This Anti-Trump Clown

Things Got Very Heated Between Sen. Kennedy and This Anti-Trump Clown
AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein

Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) said something spot-on about this anti-Trump clown, though it was during a hearing that ironically was not about the president or the Russian collusion hoax. It was about cryptocurrency, and Kennedy was defending Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY). Richard Painter is a notable anti-Trump commentator and Russian collusion hoax peddler. He thought Trump was a Russian agent—we don’t need to relitigate this nonsense. 

Advertisement

Painter accused Gillibrand of being bought off by the crypto bros, which did not sit well with Kennedy. He called on Painter to apologize, later calling him a total "whack job," which is when things went off the rails. 

While this was a great exchange, the basis for the hearing was establishing a framework for cryptocurrency regulation (via Axios):

The hearing Wednesday was to discuss a Senate market structure bill, one that would establish a legal framework for broad U.S. crypto regulation. 

The House's version, CLARITY, runs more than 200 pages and gets detailed about which kinds of assets are subject to the jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission or the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The big picture: The question now is how detailed the Senate's version will get, versus how much rulemaking power it will leave for regulators in the name of fostering innovation. 

"I hear you saying that digital assets are different," Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) said to the industry representatives on the hearing's panel. "Digital assets need special rules. I agree with that.

"The obvious question is, what should those rules be, and to what extent should we allow you to draft them?"

Advertisement

Related:

CONSERVATISM

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement