Reconciliation 2.0 Is Getting Some High Marks. This Is a MUST-Pass for the...
Karoline Leavitt Wrecked This Lefty Reporter for His Awful Take on the Minneapolis...
Some Are Saying Nick Shirley's Latest Video on Somali Fraud Is Worse Than...
Another Shooting by ICE Has the Press Desperately Looking for Ways to Reframe...
Wisconsin Cannot Afford to Follow Minnesota
HHS Secretary Kennedy Announces Healthcare Price Transparency
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche Just Promised to Stop the 'Terrorism' of MN...
Is Socialism a Form of Moderation Amongst Democrats? A WaPo Columnist Thinks So
Tim Walz Walz Begs the White House to 'Turn Down the Temperature' After...
TX Congressional Candidate Claims to Be a Trump Ally, but His Record Shows...
Cea Weaver Describes Rent-Control As a Way to Cripple the Real Estate Market
Illinois Businessman Sentenced to Six Years for $55 Million Loan and PPP Fraud...
Tim Walz Calls ICE an ‘Occupation’ as Minneapolis Descends into Chaos
North Carolina Woman Sentenced to 6 Years in $12M Medicaid Fraud Scheme
Texas Doctor, Assistant Get Prison Time for $3M Healthcare Fraud Targeting Elderly
Tipsheet

Things Got Very Heated Between Sen. Kennedy and This Anti-Trump Clown

AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein

Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) said something spot-on about this anti-Trump clown, though it was during a hearing that ironically was not about the president or the Russian collusion hoax. It was about cryptocurrency, and Kennedy was defending Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY). Richard Painter is a notable anti-Trump commentator and Russian collusion hoax peddler. He thought Trump was a Russian agent—we don’t need to relitigate this nonsense. 

Advertisement

Painter accused Gillibrand of being bought off by the crypto bros, which did not sit well with Kennedy. He called on Painter to apologize, later calling him a total "whack job," which is when things went off the rails. 

While this was a great exchange, the basis for the hearing was establishing a framework for cryptocurrency regulation (via Axios):

The hearing Wednesday was to discuss a Senate market structure bill, one that would establish a legal framework for broad U.S. crypto regulation. 

The House's version, CLARITY, runs more than 200 pages and gets detailed about which kinds of assets are subject to the jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission or the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The big picture: The question now is how detailed the Senate's version will get, versus how much rulemaking power it will leave for regulators in the name of fostering innovation. 

"I hear you saying that digital assets are different," Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) said to the industry representatives on the hearing's panel. "Digital assets need special rules. I agree with that.

"The obvious question is, what should those rules be, and to what extent should we allow you to draft them?"

Advertisement

Related:

CONSERVATISM

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement