The Woke Billionaires and Democrat-Loving Corporations Are on Their Own
So, That's How The New York Times Framed the ICE Ambush in Minneapolis...
The Departure of Top DOJ Attorneys Allegedly Over the ICE Shooting in Minneapolis...
Remember When CNN Did Ride-Alongs With ICE? Here's the (D)ifference.
Watch Josh Hawley Corner This Lib Doctor on Biology
Why the FBI Searched a Washington Post Reporter's Home Yesterday
The Non-Profit Political Scam
Standards? What Standards?
Tintin Was Deadly Wrong
Mamdani's Fantasy World of Equal Outcome
Iran Past, Present, and Future: A Conversation With Marziyeh Amirizadeh, Part 2
Tearing Down Our History
Chaos Is the Strategy, and Too Many Are Helping It Succeed
California Man Pleads Guilty to Laundering Over $1.5M and Evading Taxes on $4M
Venezuelan Man Shot After Assaulting ICE Agent With Shovel
Tipsheet

Things Got Very Heated Between Sen. Kennedy and This Anti-Trump Clown

AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein

Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) said something spot-on about this anti-Trump clown, though it was during a hearing that ironically was not about the president or the Russian collusion hoax. It was about cryptocurrency, and Kennedy was defending Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY). Richard Painter is a notable anti-Trump commentator and Russian collusion hoax peddler. He thought Trump was a Russian agent—we don’t need to relitigate this nonsense. 

Advertisement

Painter accused Gillibrand of being bought off by the crypto bros, which did not sit well with Kennedy. He called on Painter to apologize, later calling him a total "whack job," which is when things went off the rails. 

While this was a great exchange, the basis for the hearing was establishing a framework for cryptocurrency regulation (via Axios):

The hearing Wednesday was to discuss a Senate market structure bill, one that would establish a legal framework for broad U.S. crypto regulation. 

The House's version, CLARITY, runs more than 200 pages and gets detailed about which kinds of assets are subject to the jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission or the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The big picture: The question now is how detailed the Senate's version will get, versus how much rulemaking power it will leave for regulators in the name of fostering innovation. 

"I hear you saying that digital assets are different," Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) said to the industry representatives on the hearing's panel. "Digital assets need special rules. I agree with that.

"The obvious question is, what should those rules be, and to what extent should we allow you to draft them?"

Advertisement

Related:

CONSERVATISM

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement