Notice Where This Ex-ESPN Reporter's Attempt to Mock Conservatives Over Bad Bunny Laughabl...
Why Are Americans Fleeing Blue States for Red States?
Let’s Rip Democrats Apart for Fun (and Because They’re Truly Awful)
CBS News Tried to Recalibrate Detention Stats — DHS Was Having None of...
Faith, Not Foul-Mouthed Scolds, Shined at the Grammys
Is There Any Good News Out There?
Has There Been Voter Fraud?
When Canadians Were Actually Funny
The Student ICE Walkouts Are a Troubling Reminder of How Revolutionaries Are Made
America’s Security Doesn’t End at the Ice’s Edge
Talks About Talks: How Tehran Is Buying Time While Washington Hesitates
Girl Scout Cookies vs. the Inverted Food Pyramid
SBA Prioritizes American Citizens for New Loans
Let ICE Do Its Job
Will We Reach 100 Days of Straight Liberal Content on the Apple News...
Tipsheet

Ex-MSNBC Analyst Read the Book About the 2024 Election. His Takeaway About Kamala Is Devestating.

AP Photo/Matt Rourke

The book "Fight" by Amie Parnes and Jonathan Allen has been making the rounds among political and news junkies. It’s an unflinching look into the 2024 election, and the chaos that engulfed the Democrats after Nancy Pelosi executed an intra-party coup that booted Joe Biden off the ticket. Kamala Harris got liberals to cut checks, but she was an appalling candidate.

Advertisement

Liberal America got swamped trying to defend too many fronts, all of which they did poorly. They tried to say Joe was mentally sharp, only for him to get obliterated by Trump in the June debate on CNN. They tried to convince the public that Kamala was a qualified candidate—she wasn’t. They tried to convince the electorate that their immensely unpopular agenda was a recipe for success that should continue for another four years. There are others, but when you have crap food and staff—defeat is inevitable.

On 2Way, the Morning Meeting show hosted by ex-MSNBC analyst Mark Halperin, Sean Spicer said his takeaway was that Kamala was such an atrocious candidate that she wouldn’t win an election for dogcatcher. She was terrible, her staff was bad, and her strategy was bad—everything about the Harris operation reeked of incompetence, much like the Biden White House. Dan Turrentine also agreed that Harris is flawed and that her reported political comeback in California’s gubernatorial race isn’t certain. 

Advertisement

Related:

2024 ELECTION

Halperin agreed with both men and added that Harris’ major flaw is that she doesn’t like to make difficult decisions under pressure. What’s her message, and how will she sell why she’s the gal to lead California after suffering what arguably is a public career-ending defeat? I doubt she’s learned anything. Her major flaw, which Halperin mentioned, is at the core of competence regarding executive function and leadership. Dear Lord.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos