Watch Scott Jennings Slap Down This Shoddy Talking Point About the Spending Bill
We Have the Long-Awaited News About Who Will Control the Minnesota State House
60 Minutes Reporter Reveals Her Greatest Fear as We Enter a Second Trump...
Wait, Is Joe Biden Even Awake to Sign the New Spending Bill?
NYC Mayor Eric Adams Explains Why He Confronted Suspected UnitedHealthcare Shooter to His...
The Absurd—and Cruel—Myth of a ‘Government Shutdown’
Biden Was Too 'Mentally Fatigued' to Take Call From Top Committee Chair Before...
Who Is Going to Replace JD Vance In the Senate?
'I Have a Confession': CNN Host Makes Long-Overdue Apology
There Are New Details on the Alleged Suspect in Trump Assassination
Doing Some Last Minute Christmas Shopping? Make Sure to Avoid Woke Companies.
Biden Signs Stopgap Bill Into Law Just Hours Before Looming Gov’t Shutdown Deadline
Massive 17,000 Page Report on How the Biden Admin Weaponized the Federal Government...
Trump Hits Biden With Amicus Brief Over the 'Fire Sale' of Border Wall
JK Rowling Marked the Anniversary of When She First Spoke Out Against Transgender...
Tipsheet

Georgia Judge Delivers a Blow to Fulton County DA in 2020 Election Trial

Fulton County Sheriff’s Office via AP

Donald Trump’s chance for a lengthy trial in the Georgia 2020 election interference investigation increased when a judge refused Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’ request to have all 19 defendants put on trial by October 23. Citing procedural concerns and protecting the due process rights of all involved, the judge noted this was a procedural inevitability. As The Daily Caller pointed out, two defendants, Ken Chesebro and Sidney Powell, want a speedy trial. Their cases will likely be severed, leaving Trump to have his day in court later: 

Advertisement

A Georgia judge shot down Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’ hope to try former President Donald Trump and all the co-defendants in her racketeering case on Oct. 23, calling it an “absolute necessity” to sever the case. 

Judge Scott McAfee ruled Thursday that separating the 17 defendants who did not demand speedy trials from the two who did, Ken Chesebro and Sidney Powell, is a “procedural and logistical inevitability.” McAfee further stated that “additional divisions” may be required, a decision that would be made “once the many pretrial motions have been resolved.” 

“The precarious ability of the Court to safeguard each defendant’s due process rights and ensure adequate pretrial preparation on the current accelerated track weighs heavily, if not decisively, in favor of severance,” he wrote. 

This case would always be the longest, though not the most severe, facing Trump regarding the charges. It’s a RICO case, which is stunning. Then again, as soon as we learned it had become a racketeering investigation in May, we should’ve expected an indictment. RICO always leads to something for those entangled in one of these probes. 

Advertisement

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution has more on the ruling, with Judge Scott McAfee elaborating on the pressing logistical challenges that are ahead: 

The Fulton County judge overseeing the sprawling election interference probe on Thursday split the case’s 19 defendants into two groups, saving former President Donald Trump from going to trial in Georgia in October. 

Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee ruled that 17 of the defendants would be split off — or severed, in legal parlance — from Kenneth Chesebro and Sidney Powell, who have demanded speedy trials and are set to be tried on Oct. 23. 

[…] 

The ruling is a blow to the Fulton District Attorney’s office, which argued in favor of keeping all 19 defendants together. In a court filing earlier this week, DA Fani Willis said trying defendants in multiple groups would create a “logistical quagmire” for courthouse staff, witnesses and jurors and that judicial efficiency merited trying the group together. 

[…] 

McAfee, meanwhile, voiced concerns about the logistics of holding a “mega-trial.” 

“The Fulton County Courthouse simply contains no courtroom adequately large enough to hold all 19 defendants, their multiple attorneys and support staff, the sheriff’s deputies, court personnel, and the State’s prosecutorial team. Relocating to another larger venue raises security concerns that cannot be rapidly addressed,” he said. 

[…] 

“Each additional defendant increases the length of opening and closing arguments, cross- examination, and the number of evidentiary objections,” he wrote. “Each additional defendant increases the risk that the trial must be paused due to the unexpected absence of a party or attorney.” 

A month ago, a Fulton grand jury handed up the 41-count racketeering indictment, tied to Trump’s attempt to hold onto power in Georgia and other swing states following the 2020 election. 

The judge wrote that the “ripple effects” of a months-long, multi-defendant trial on the local criminal justice system must be considered, and added that “additional divisions of these 17 defendants may well be required” in the future. Roughly a dozen parties have filed motions to sever themselves from some or all of their other co-defendants, though McAfee did not rule on those requests.

Advertisement

Over a dozen defendants with legal teams asking for continuances, and the inevitable preparation to draft a defense that isn’t constitutionally deficient paves the way for a long trial. Trump wants lengthy trials for all his indictments, though there is an enormous risk even if the charges are politically motivated. I doubt Trump will escape conviction, facing nearly 100 felonies. Trump is also facing state charges in the Peach State, meaning should he win in 2024, he can’t pardon himself. But law professor Jonathan Turley has also been warning Democrats, despite the legal gauntlet the former president must endure, he also won’t be serving jail time now or anytime in the near future.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement