'This Is Where the Systematic Killing Took Place': 200 Days of War From...
Hamas Publishes Proof of Life Video for American Hostage
Watch Biden Lose the Battle With His Teleprompter Again
Thanks, Biden! Here's How Iran Is Still Making Billions to Fund Terrorism
Trump Not Sending His Best
Current Thoughts on the Campaign
UnitedHealth Has Too Much Power
Former Democratic Rep. Who Lost to John Fetterman Sure Doesn't Like the Senator...
Biden Rewrote Title IX to Protect 'Trans' People. Here's How Somes States Responded.
Watch: Joe Biden's Latest Flub Is Laugh-Out-Loud Funny
Hundreds of Athletes Urge the NCAA to Allow Men to Compete Against Women
‘Net Neutrality’ Would Give Biden Wartime Powers to Censor Online Speech
Lefty Journalist Deceptively Edits Clip of Fox News Legal Expert
Is the Marist Poll a Cause for Concern?
A Swiss Air Jet Nearly Collided With Four Planes at JFK Airport
Tipsheet

Sen. Hawley Obliterates a Biden Nominee Over Her Defense of Religious Discrimination

Al Drago/Pool via AP

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) took a Biden judicial nominee to the woodshed during her stint as DC’s solicitor general. President Joe Biden nominated Loren AliKhan to become the next district judge for the District of Columbia. Ms. AliKhan currently serves on the DC Court of Appeals. Hawley says he always asks nominees if they ever litigated against a religious liberty claim to which most say no, but Judge AliKhan has been involved in multiple cases.

Advertisement

AliKhan was involved in the Capitol Hill Baptist Church v. Bowser, which was a COVID lockdown case. Hawley zeroed in that the policy only targeted religious gatherings. Judge AliKhan, serving as DC’s solicitor general at the time, pushed back, arguing that it was about a provision about the containment policy that restricted all types of activity in the district. 

“All types of activity in the district,” Hawley asked. When AliKhan said yes, Hawley redirected, asking if it applied to mass protests in the district. 

Again, AliKhan attempted to clarify that the provision was related to normal daily activities, like going to work, shopping, and churchgoing, to which Hawley responded, "So, it exempted unusual or unlikely activities in the statute that’s in the ordinance.” 

AliKhan could only respond by saying that at the outset of the pandemic, the mayor’s office was trying to be as comprehensive as possible regarding containing the pathogen vis-à-vis daily activities. 

Advertisement

That’s all well, but what about the hordes of protesters who swarmed the city and were encouraged by Democrats and liberal media figures? Yet, the person who wants to keep their restaurant open or pray at church is selfish and could spread the disease. Hawley exposed the hypocrisy of the ‘stay home, save lives’ mantra the political class drummed up to keep us locked inside our homes over a virus with a 99-plus percent survival rate. 

AliKhan later said the omission of mass protests was due to the mayor’s office not contemplating the issue, sparking Hawley to ask if the judge felt that mass protests should be a separate category as a religious observance. 

Hawley did well to expose the nonsensical position Democrats took on mass protests by endorsing them during the 2020 election, in the thick of the pandemic—but was like hell on wheels toward people who wanted to go to church outside while wearing masks and being socially distanced. 

Advertisement

The lockdown ordinance was later struck down as unconstitutional, which AliKhan tried to mask her defeat in legalese which Hawley took exception to, begging the judge not to play these games. The Missouri Republican later went through the timeline of the ordinance’s demise, which included Mayor Bowser attending mass protests in the city while denying churchgoers their right to congregate for services. Of course, he's not voting to approve her nomination.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement