The liberal media says it’s an attack to criticize them. If you call us an enemy to the people, you’re really playing with fire or something. That’s total garbage. This is America. If you suck, you get criticized. Suck it up, you weak, soy boy buttercups. And we love it. We love it when President Trump calls you out on your nonsense—and this weekend was quite the bonfire.
They tried to character assassinate Justice Brett Kavanaugh again. They just cannot stand that Trump won, that America won, and that baseless sexual misconduct allegations lost. It’s too late. He’s confirmed. He’s on the court. And he’s not going away. Elections have consequences and liberals need to understand that they’re not entitled to win all of them.
The New York Times peddled a new accuser who, and get this, doesn’t even remember that Kavanaugh ever allegedly assaulted her. It’s similar to the accusation that Deborah Ramirez lobbed against Kavanaugh during his confirmation hearing. That a drunken Kavanaugh shoved his genitals in her face at a drunken college party at Yale. The Times piece rehashed the Ramirez story, but had this tidbit:
We also uncovered a previously unreported story about Mr. Kavanaugh in his freshman year that echoes Ms. Ramirez’s allegation. A classmate, Max Stier, saw Mr. Kavanaugh with his pants down at a different drunken dorm party, where friends pushed his penis into the hand of a female student. Mr. Stier, who runs a nonprofit organization in Washington, notified senators and the F.B.I. about this account, but the F.B.I. did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly. We corroborated the story with two officials who have communicated with Mr. Stier; the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say she does not recall the episode.
In the @nytimes Kavanaugh article, it says "Two F.B.I. agents interviewed Ms. Ramirez, telling her that they found her “credible.”"
— Jeryl Bier (@JerylBier) September 16, 2019
"telling her"
So it's Ms. Ramirez telling Times reporters that the FBI agents said she was "credible".https://t.co/iR11mDp2S4 pic.twitter.com/rGlUN1XGIH
How did the @nytimes editors fail to include the below info in their article re: Kavanuagh? Would they have done so had @MZHemingway not noted the glaring omission yesterday? It was a stunning decision to leave that central fact out of an article filled with damning accusations. pic.twitter.com/ldlTYmqcTt
— Joe Scarborough (@JoeNBC) September 16, 2019
In case you missed the @nytimes latest stealth edit: https://t.co/NKbNIZJSMa
— Jeryl Bier (@JerylBier) September 16, 2019
If by “credibly” you mean “nonsensically” then yes absolutely https://t.co/XXoI3fUrGV
— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) September 16, 2019
The @nytimes in the morning:
— The Reagan Battalion (@ReaganBattalion) September 16, 2019
BREAKING: New assault allegations surface against Justice Kavanaugh.
The @nytimes in the evening: Correction, we forgot to tell you that the alleged victim says that the alleged assault never happened.
THIS IS WHY AMERICANS DON’T TRUST YOU! pic.twitter.com/BwPtnMaAhY
This is not wrong. https://t.co/XbZrK4cYig
— Mollie (@MZHemingway) September 16, 2019
The story:
— The Reagan Battalion (@ReaganBattalion) September 15, 2019
• Liberal activist A says that Kavanaugh assulted lady B back when he was in college.
• The @nytimes contacts lady B.
• Lady B tells @nytimes she has no idea what liberal activist A is talking about.
• @nytimes publishes story without comments from Lady B.
BAHAHAHAHAHA *breathes* BAHAHAHAHAHA https://t.co/LnqZXlaBDy
— Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) September 16, 2019
That addition was included after the story blew up and the publication had to issue this note:
An earlier version of this article, which was adapted from a forthcoming book, did not include one element of the book's account regarding an assertion by a Yale classmate that friends of Brett Kavanaugh pushed his penis into the hand of a female student at a drunken dorm party. The book reports that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say that she does not recall the incident. That information has been added to the article.
So, it’s a nothing burger. It’s another nothing burger. Another character assassination attempt and a warning from the Left that they will engage in the politics of destruction if you dare oppose their abortion agenda, among other things. Conservatives need to follow suit in defense of our principles—that we will not only defend ourselves but ruin our attackers with ruthless efficiency with sheer brutality. Not just delivering a haymaker in response, but more like two shots to the head, bludgeoned, set on fire, and then run over with a tank—metaphorically speaking. We have to hate these people more than they hate us. It’s the only way to win. It’s the only way to defend our agenda. Show no mercy for you shall receive none. This was done to get the impeachment of Kavanaugh train started—and it has for the current 2020 Democratic crop. Only after the nuke has gone off have some publications noted the journalistic malpractice here, but like nuclear winter itself. There’s’ no one left around to see it (via AP):
Headlined “Brett Kavanaugh Fit In With the Privileged Kids. She Did Not,” the story was primarily about Deborah Ramirez, a Connecticut woman who alleged that Kavanaugh, as a freshman at Yale in 1983, had pulled down his pants and thrust his penis at her. Kavanaugh has denied those claims.
Yet the authors said they’d uncovered a similar story involving Kavanaugh at another freshman-year party, where he allegedly exposed himself and friends pushed his penis into the hands of a female student. The story said former classmate Max Stier reported the incident to the FBI and senators as Kavanaugh’s nomination was being discussed, but the story said Stier would not discuss it with the authors. Kavanaugh would not comment on the story, a court spokeswoman said Monday.
After the story was posted online but before it was in the print edition, the Times revised the story to add that the book reported that the woman supposedly involved in the incident declined to be interviewed, and that her friends say she doesn’t recall the incident. While an editor’s note pointed out the revision, it did not say why those facts had been left out in the first place. A Times spokeswoman said no one was available for an interview on Monday.
The Times’ deputy editorial page editor, James Dao, posted answers to readers’ question on the newspaper’s website Monday evening but did not address this issue.
[…]
The Washington Post, detailing its own decision on the story, called into question the Times’ decision to run with the accusation in the first place.
The Post said that last year it had independently confirmed that lawmakers and authorities knew of the second accusation against Kavanaugh, but did not write about it because the woman involved would not comment and the alleged witnesses were not identified.
[…]
The Times also apologized for an offensive tweet sent out by the opinion section advertising its initial story. The tweet said: “Having a penis thrust in your face at a drunken dorm party may seem like harmless fun. But when Brett Kavanaugh did it to her, Deborah Ramirez says, it confirmed that she didn’t belong at Yale University in the first place.”
The Times deleted the tweet and said it was “clearly inappropriate and offensive” and was looking into how it was sent.
NEW -- NYT's @rpogrebin suggests unnamed woman in her Kavanaugh excerpt may have been too drunk to remember Kavanaugh's penis being pushed into her hand.https://t.co/e5bW0Z2ZSJ
— Vince Coglianese (@VinceCoglianese) September 17, 2019
She declined to be interviewed, her friends say this never happened, but here are NY Times reporters speculating on her state of mind anyway on national TV to save their own face. They should both be fired & journalists who care about credibility should want them fired
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) September 17, 2019
Fine, you won’t let me interview you? I’ll just go on National TV and tell everyone you were drunk. You don’t like that? Dispute it to me on record in an interview.
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) September 17, 2019
Plot thickens.
— Chuck Ross (@ChuckRossDC) September 17, 2019
Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly claim that the qualifier about the other alleged Kavanaugh accuser not remembering an incident at Yale was included in the initial NYT draft but removed. pic.twitter.com/p9wUTnFyM1
Yeah, that was another thing that was mocked; that the Times thought that having someone shove their penis in your face was “harmless fun.” It was a banner weekend for the paper that all the news that’s fit to print. Frankly, you’d get more utility wiping your rear end with it after this fiasco. Now, the authors of the Times piece are blaming their bosses for omitting the part where the alleged new accuser, Harmon Joyce, said she doesn’t remember. Oh, and she might have been too drunk or something. The point is even though she didn’t remember the alleged assault doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. That’s an entirely different debate. What is clear is that that is not enough to put to print—anywhere. This was done to deliver a missile strike at Kavanaugh, the GOP, and the Trump White House. This was done to push the Democratic agenda. This is their media complex at work. It’s vast. It’s effective. It’s unrelenting. Trump won the 2016 election. He can pick his judges. Democrats don’t have that power—and they can’t stand it. This party and their allies in the media did well confirming that they’re enemies of the people, of this country, and they have to be stopped in 2020.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member