Pre-Election Special SALE: 60% Off VIP Membership
BREAKING: Supreme Court Rules on Whether Virginia Can Remove Non-Citizens From Voter Rolls
Tim Walz's Gaming Session With Ocasio-Cortez Was a Trainwreck
Oregon Predicates Request to Judge on Self-Delusion
GDP Report Shows Economy 'Weaker Than Expected'
How Trump Plans to Help Compensate Victims of 'Migrant Crime'
NRCC Blasts the Left's Voter Suppression Efforts in Battleground Districts
Watch Trump's Reaction to Finding Out Biden Called His Supporters 'Garbage'
Scott Jennings Calls Out CNN Host, Panelists Trying to Desperately Explain Away Biden's...
There Was a Vile, Violent Attack in Chicago, and the Media's Been Silent....
One Red State Just Acquired a Massive Amount of Land to Secure Its...
Poll Out of Texas Shows That Harris Rally Sure Didn't Work for Colin...
This Hollywood Actor Is Persuading Christian Men to Vote for Kamala Harris
Is the Trump Campaign Over-Confident?
Is This Really How the Kamala HQ Is Going to Respond to Biden’s...
Tipsheet

ICYMI: We Have Two New Gun Laws Going In Effect In Deep Blue Illinois

Tis’ the season to curb gun rights, I guess. In New Jersey, it’s now illegal to own so-called high-capacity magazines. How that ban will be enforced remains to be seen? Will the New Jersey State Police go door-to-door? Well, they’re sort of avoiding that question on that front. In Illinois, we have two laws going into effect. One law mandates a 72-hour waiting period on all firearm purchases, while another establishes an extreme protection order for individuals who might pose a danger to themselves or others. In other words, these folks, if they own firearms, can have them confiscated without their consent if they’re considered “too dangerous” (via WQAD 8):

Advertisement

According to the Office of Senator Neil Anderson, the first law titled “SB 3256/PA 100-0606” creates a 72-hour waiting period on all firearms, not just handguns.

[…]

The second new gun law titled “HB 2354/PA 100-0607” allows family or police to petition the court for an ex parte order (Restraining order or an order that benefits only one side in a case) if the person:

“poses a significant danger of causing personal injury to himself/herself or another by having in his/her custody or control, owning, purchasing, possessing or receiving a firearm.”

This new law would allow family or police to take away a persons right to own a firearm without their knowledge if they are deemed “too dangerous.”

WQAD added that the waiting period law eliminates the exemption for non-Illinois residents buying firearms at gun shows. Waiting periods are worthless. They don’t reduce crime. It’s window dressing and at worst, infringes on one’s constitutional right to own firearms. Suppose you’re in a life or death situation, especially with a violent stalker or an abusive spouse or significant other, and you needed a firearm for protection. This impedes on that immensely. The restraining order, as I’ve mentioned before, isn’t something that I’m against outright. I think this is one area that both sides can agree on, but the language and how the law is crafted needs to be hyper-analyzed to avoid abuse. What is deemed “too dangerous”? We’ll see how this law plays out, but in deep blue Illinois—you know the chances of abuse are probably high. Government corruption is not an alien trait in this state. The laws go into effect on January 1. 

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement