Chuck Schumer Really Doesn't Want to Compensate Victims of Government Abuse
Senate Candidates Face Perjury Allegations for Election Rigging Scheme
Doug Burgum Schools CNN on What the Real D.C. Clean Up Scandal Should...
Check Out Who Zohran Mamdani Picked to Be NYC Sheriff
Here's What We Know About the Federal Judge Trying to Stop Renovations of...
Gov. Tina Kotek Bragged About Oregon's Graduation Rates. There's Just One Problem.
Study Shows Massive Support for Self-Defense, Recreational Shooting
Nick Shirley Questions What CA Dems Have to Hide as 'The Stop Nick...
Mamdani to Spend Astounding $5 Million On What Some Describe as the Socialists'...
Spencer Pratt Leads Karen Bass Ahead of LA's Primary Election
Goodbye Pride Month, Hello Nuclear Family Month
This Wacky Congresswoman Just Demanded an 'Underground Railroad for Abortion'
Inside the Republicans' Fight to Keep Maine’s Senate Seat Red
Iran Claims It Stopped Talking With The United States. Trump Isn't Worried.
Tom Steyer Vows to Protect Men in Women's Sports as 'Transgender' Athlete Places...
Tipsheet

What In The Fresh Hell Is This? The Phrase ‘Bringing Home The Bacon’ Could Be Offensive…To Vegans

What In The Fresh Hell Is This? The Phrase ‘Bringing Home The Bacon’ Could Be Offensive…To Vegans

Everything is offensive in today’s politically correct atmosphere. Folks say it’s important to be more aware of certain aspects of society; they call it “increases awareness,” which is liberal speak for stuff we don’t like. I guess that’s important in principle…unless you’re a piece of trash vegan or vegetarian. Across the pond, our cousins in the United Kingdom, published a piece about how the rise of these two food trends, which ironically encapsulate the epitome of upper-middle class privilege, are trying to sanitize certain phrases, like “bringing home the bacon,” because it might offend these devil people (via The Independent):

Advertisement

You may think phrases like “bringing home the bacon” and “putting all your eggs in one basket” are harmless quirks of the English language, but they could be offending vegans and vegetarians, with one academic claiming they might end up being avoided altogether as a result.

As research shows more people are removing animal products from their diets than ever before, Shareena Hamzah of Swansea University says idioms involving animal products could be rendered obsolete because they are out of touch with the zeitgeist.

Writing for The Conversation, the researcher explains how meat-based metaphors are a popular staple of our everyday vernacular but that an increased awareness in the environmental and ethical issues surrounding meat production “will undoubtedly be reflected in our language and literature” and that this language may no longer be so widely accepted. 

“In today’s reality, meat is repeatedly the subject of much socially and politically charged discussion, including about how the demand for meat is contributing to climate change and environmental degradation,” she continues.

“Given that fiction often reflects on real world events and societal issues, it may very well be that down the line powerful meat metaphors are eschewed.

Advertisement

That means use as many “meat metaphors” as possible, folks. Why? Because screw these people. The Left rants and whines about so-called privilege, well—this is it. Meat is a source of sustenance for most of the world that cannot afford to go vegan or vegetarian. These people suck. Sorry, all of you do. The late Anthony Bourdain was right; you’re the terrorists of the culinary world. The nefarious Hezbollah splinter cells infesting the kitchen. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement