The Midterm Campaign Will Be 'America Is Awesome vs. America Is Awful'
Will Republicans Blow It in Red States?
Mary Bruce Cites Iran Contradictions Based on Media Lies, and The Bulwark's Fluid...
Can the Left Go One Day Without Criticizing President Trump? No, They Cannot.
Why the United States Must Keep Funding Israel’s Defense
The Clintons: At It Again
The Iranian Two-Step
Epic Fury: It's About Time
Why Healthcare Is So Expensive in America, and What to Do About It
Between Deterrence and Peace: What History Demands We Remember
Killing the 'Great Satan'
Three Men Plead Guilty to $88 Million 'Pre-IPO' Securities Fraud Scheme
Montana Sen. Steve Daines Makes a Surprising Announcement
West Virginia Man Faces Federal Charges for Alleged Death Threats to President Trump,...
$360 Million Stolen: New Bill Targets Rampant SNAP Card Skimming
Tipsheet

WaPo's Ruth Marcus: Gorsuch Was Just As Forthcoming As Ruth Bader Ginsburg, You Know

WaPo's Ruth Marcus: Gorsuch Was Just As Forthcoming As Ruth Bader Ginsburg, You Know

Senate Democrats are one-by-one lining up to block Judge Neil Gorsuch from filling the vacancy left by the late Justice Antonin Scalia. Nominated by President Trump, Gorsuch impressed Feinstein, with at least nine Senate Democrats saying they support a hearing and a vote for him. Concerning his credentials, there were no arguments; Gorsuch is beyond reproach. And he’s eminently qualified to be a Supreme Court justice. There is a problem: Trump. He won. And now the progressive base of the Democratic Party is demanding all-out war. Democrats know that they lack the political strength to do this, but it looks like they’re going to expend their gunpowder on Gorsuch, which isn’t even a major battle. A conservative is replacing a conservative with this inane filibuster attempt Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is trying to cobble together. Senate Republicans will nuke the rule to allow for confirmation of Gorsuch through a simple majority. And no, there isn’t anyone better. Lest we forget that Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas, men viewed as anathema to the Left, were never filibustered. All this shows is that Schumer and Senate Democrats are unable to cope with the fact that Hillary lacked the competitive zeal to win, and that Senate Republicans sidelined Garland’s nomination. It’s petty politics fraught with hypocrisy right now.

Advertisement

As For Gorsuch’s hearings, no one who is serious thought he did badly. Even MSNBC was reporting that he was killing the confirmation hearing game. Schumer penned an op-ed in The New York Times how Gorsuch was pretty much playing a game of deception by not answering questions. I’m sure Schumer respects and likes justices of a liberal stripe, like Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who effused to answer questions (70 of them) at her confirmation hearing. The Washington Post’s Ruth Marcus also said that Gorsuch was just as forthcoming as Ginsburg was during this process.

Scores of liberals, including Obama’s former solicitor general, support Gorsuch’s nomination, which only further highlights the absurdity of the Democrats’ position. There’s broad political cover for them to nuke the filibuster rules to get a man that everyone knows is qualified to sit on the Supreme Court. If there is a second vacancy, and it is possible, then Democrats will have little recourse in terms of mounting an effective defense. Republicans are expected to gain seats in the Senate after the 2018 midterms. They can push through a much more hard core conservative, like William Pryor, through the confirmation process, creating a solid 5-4 conservative majority on the Court.

In the end, there really is no good reason to oppose Gorsuch. None. Even liberals agree with that sentiment.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement