Calm Down About JD Vance
Caracas in Ruins: Up to 100,000 Feared Dead As Massive Earthquakes Rock Venezuela
Sorry, Mr. President, but the SAVE Act Isn’t Happening This Year
The Mind and Brilliance of Alexis de Tocqueville, Part Two
The Anti-Socialists Strike Back
A Time of Choosing
Trump: The Greater Risk Was Waiting
From London's Tennis Courts to California, Aggressive Taxes Always Disappoint
World Cup Visitors Get It; the Pope and Socialists Don't
The Socialists Are Coming for Your Grandparents
Despite the 54th Anniversary of Title IX, Men Are Still Competing in Women’s...
Fog of War: When Political Rhetoric Meets Strategic Reality
Trump Declares 'America Is Back' at America250 Kickoff
Four Charged in Scheme to Profit Off NYC Migrant Housing Crisis
Illegal Alien Charged With Stealing American's Identity, Bilking $800K From Taxpayers
Tipsheet

Pile On: Even CNN Took Couric's Anti-Gun Film To The Woodshed Over Manipulative Edits

Pile On: Even CNN Took Couric's Anti-Gun Film To The Woodshed Over Manipulative Edits

On Sunday, CNN’s Reliable Sources tore into Katie Couric’s anti-gun feature, Under The Gun, which was exposed for selectively editing an interview with members of the Virginia Citizens Defense League. Couric asked a question about background checks, which VCDL members immediately answered, but the film crew decided to leave that on the cutting room floor, instead showing eight seconds of silence that made gun owners look like idiots. Director Stephanie Soechtig said the pause was added for people to ponder the question. The Huffington Post and National Public Radio criticized the decisions, with NPR saying that this “manipulation” would never meet their standards for interviewing.

Advertisement

Stelter said Soechtig’s reason for the pause was “BS,” before bringing in Liz Harrington of The Washington Free Beacon, the news organization that first broke the story about the edits, on the show to discuss the controversy.

Harrington added that it’s misleading and that documentaries should be focused on the facts. Stelter then asked David Zurawik, a media critic with The Baltimore Sun, if these edits could be defended in any way, shape, or form. Zurawik then went on the warpath:

“Absolutely not, Brian—if I vented the contempt I have for that kind of dishonesty in the documentary format, I think I’d drop over right now from a stroke. It’s outrageous in that—what you called a BS explanation—absolutely. That was so bad, I couldn’t believe it. We wanted to listen to her [Couric], to pause to think about it, please. And the lie upon lie! Dishonest documentary makers are one of the lowest forms of life in media. No defense.”

Ouch. But Soechtig is not backing down. Besides seemingly admitting to breaking federal gun laws while making this feature, she remains unapologetic over the decision to selectively edit her feature. The National Shooting Sports Foundation found this admission troubling and urged the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives to investigate the matter.

Advertisement

It seems Couric and company have no friends save for the anti-gun crowd.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement