'Trouble in Paradise': GOP Plan to Reopen DHS Is Looking a Little Shaky
Pam Bondi Reportedly Isn't the Only One on the Chopping Block
AI-Powered Schools Might Be Coming to Your Neighborhood
A Foolish NATO Was a Big Loser in the Iran War
Jim Acosta Proudly Delivers Toilet Content, and Trump's War Speech Sees the Press...
Will Gov. Spanberger Ignore Detainers for These Violent Criminal Illegals? ICE Is Warning...
Kash Patel Just Shamed Senator Sheldon Whitehouse for Failing the People of Rhode...
Has the UK Home Office Just Ended This Orwellian Policy or Merely Redefined...
Fewer Than Half the Number of Guns Turned in Than Canadian Government Expected
BBC Radio Should Have an IQ Requirement for Its People, Apparently
Watch an Old Clip of Charlie Kirk Debating a Student on Birthright Citizenship
Stephen A. Smith Explains Why He Regrets Voting for Kamala Harris
New CNN Poll: Even Democrats Are Done With Democrats
The White House's New Fraud Task Force Takes Down It's First Target in...
New Jersey Man Charged in Multi-Million Dollar No-Fault Insurance Fraud Scheme
Tipsheet

Pile On: Even CNN Took Couric's Anti-Gun Film To The Woodshed Over Manipulative Edits

Pile On: Even CNN Took Couric's Anti-Gun Film To The Woodshed Over Manipulative Edits

On Sunday, CNN’s Reliable Sources tore into Katie Couric’s anti-gun feature, Under The Gun, which was exposed for selectively editing an interview with members of the Virginia Citizens Defense League. Couric asked a question about background checks, which VCDL members immediately answered, but the film crew decided to leave that on the cutting room floor, instead showing eight seconds of silence that made gun owners look like idiots. Director Stephanie Soechtig said the pause was added for people to ponder the question. The Huffington Post and National Public Radio criticized the decisions, with NPR saying that this “manipulation” would never meet their standards for interviewing.

Advertisement

Stelter said Soechtig’s reason for the pause was “BS,” before bringing in Liz Harrington of The Washington Free Beacon, the news organization that first broke the story about the edits, on the show to discuss the controversy.

Harrington added that it’s misleading and that documentaries should be focused on the facts. Stelter then asked David Zurawik, a media critic with The Baltimore Sun, if these edits could be defended in any way, shape, or form. Zurawik then went on the warpath:

“Absolutely not, Brian—if I vented the contempt I have for that kind of dishonesty in the documentary format, I think I’d drop over right now from a stroke. It’s outrageous in that—what you called a BS explanation—absolutely. That was so bad, I couldn’t believe it. We wanted to listen to her [Couric], to pause to think about it, please. And the lie upon lie! Dishonest documentary makers are one of the lowest forms of life in media. No defense.”

Ouch. But Soechtig is not backing down. Besides seemingly admitting to breaking federal gun laws while making this feature, she remains unapologetic over the decision to selectively edit her feature. The National Shooting Sports Foundation found this admission troubling and urged the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives to investigate the matter.

Advertisement

It seems Couric and company have no friends save for the anti-gun crowd.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement