An Iranian Political Prisoner Said This About Obama and October 7...and CNN Panicked
What Is Trump's 'Shield of the America's' Initiative?
Are California Voters About to Require Voter ID in State Elections?
The Democrats Laughed at Space Force. They're Not Laughing Anymore
An Old Clip of Marco Rubio Warning About Obama’s Iran Deal Is Going...
Pray for Peace in the Middle East
This Republican Lawmaker Is Reportedly Retiring After This Term
IRGC Operative Convicted in Plot to Assassinate U.S. Officials, Including Trump
U.S. Seeks to Seize $15M Allegedly Linked to Iranian Oil Shipping Network
Would a John Lujan Nomination Cost Republicans TX-35?
Minnesota Democrat Lawmaker Urges Studying 'the Benefits of Shoplifting and Retail Theft'
Report: NYC Mayor Mamdani’s Wife Liked Social Media Posts Celebrating Oct. 7 Hamas...
Russian National Charged in $1.2M Medicare Fraud Scheme
New Jersey Man Admits Bringing 100 Explosive Devices to D.C. Cathedral
D.C. Dentist, Hygienist Convicted in $4M Medicaid Fraud Scheme
Tipsheet

WaPo Flashback: DOJ Probably Does Not Have Enough To File Civil Rights Charges Against Darren Wilson

WaPo Flashback: DOJ Probably Does Not Have Enough To File Civil Rights Charges Against Darren Wilson

As Katie mentioned yesterday, the Department of Justice is still conducting an ongoing investigation of its own:

While the grand jury proceeding in St. Louis County has concluded, the Justice Department’s investigation into the shooting of Michael Brown remains ongoing. Though we have shared information with local prosecutors during the course of our investigation, the federal inquiry has been independent of the local one from the start, and remains so now. Even at this mature stage of the investigation, we have avoided prejudging any of the evidence. And although federal civil rights law imposes a high legal bar in these types of cases, we have resisted forming premature conclusions," Holder released in a statement.

Advertisement

DOJ is investigating whether Michael Brown’s civil rights were violated and whether there are discriminatory police practices happening in Ferguson.

Yet, on October 31, it was reported that federal officials probably don’t have enough evidence to file civil rights charges against Officer Darren Wilson, but a DOJ spokesperson called such assumptions premature (via WaPo):

Justice Department investigators have all but concluded they do not have a strong enough case to bring civil rights charges against Darren Wilson, the white police officer who shot and killed an unarmed black teenager in Ferguson, Mo., law enforcement officials said.

“The evidence at this point does not support civil rights charges against Officer Wilson,” said one person briefed on the investigation, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the case.

Justice Department officials are loath to acknowledge publicly that their case cannot now meet the high legal threshold for a successful civil rights prosecution.

Justice spokesman Brian Fallon said the case remains open and any discussion of its results is premature. “This is an irresponsible report by The Washington Post that is based on idle speculation,” Fallon said in a statement.

Other law enforcement officials interviewed by The Post said it was not too soon to say how the investigation would end. “The evidence we have makes federal civil rights charges unlikely,” one said.

Advertisement
H/T Dan McLaughlin.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos