Over 800 Google Workers Demand the Company Cut Ties With ICE
UNL Student Government Passes SJP-Backed Israel Divestment Resolution
AOC Mourns the Loss of ’Our Media,’ More Layoffs Across the Industry (and...
The Left Just Doesn't Understand Why WaPo Is Failing
16 Years and $16 Billion Later the First Railhead Goes Down for CA's...
New Musical Remakes Anne Frank As a Genderqueer Hip-Hop Star
Toledo Man Indicted for Threatening to Kill Vice President JD Vance During Ohio...
Fort Lauderdale Financial Advisor Sentenced to 20 Years for $94M International Ponzi Schem...
FCC Is Reportedly Investigating The View
Illegal Immigrant Allegedly Used Stolen Identity to Vote and Collect $400K in Federal...
$26 Billion Gone: Stellantis Joins Automakers Retreating From EVs
House Oversight Chair: Clintons Don’t Get Special Treatment in Epstein Probe
Utah Man Sentenced for Stealing Funds Meant to Aid Ukrainian First Responders
Ex-Bank Employee Pleads Guilty to Laundering $8M for Overseas Criminal Organization
State Department Orders Evacuation of US Citizens in Iran As Possibility of Military...
Tipsheet

The Goldwater Myth?

Forty-five years later, an interesting historical debate is taking place regarding whether or not Barry Goldwater's 1964 campaign helped -- or hurt -- the conservative cause.
Advertisement


Of course, most conservatives would argue that the '64 campaign was vital, inasmuch as it clearly defined conservatism -- and introduced America to Ronald Reagan.

But David Frum argues that 1964 was an "unmitigated catastrophe for Republicans and conservatives." 

... Over at AmSpecBlog, Jim Antle counters with some good thoughts on the subject.

Regardless of where you come down on this (I'm pro-Goldwater), Frum's arguments are, at least, interesting to consider ...

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos