'Iron Lung' and the Future of Filmmaking
These Athletes Are Getting Paid to Shame Their Own Country at the Olympics
WaPo CEO Resigns Days After Laying Off 300 Employees
Georgia's Jon Ossoff Says Trump Administration Imitates Rhetoric of 'History's Worst Regim...
U.S. Thwarts $4 Million Weapons Plot Aimed at Toppling South Sudan Government
Minnesota Mom, Daughter, and Relative Allegedly Stole $325k from SNAP
Michigan AG: Detroit Man Stole 12 Identities to Collect Over $400,000 in Public...
Does Maxine Waters Really Think Trump Will Be Bothered by Her Latest Tantrum?
Fifth Circuit Rules That Some Illegal Aliens Can Be Detained Without Bond Until...
Just Days After Mass Layoffs, WaPo Returns to Lying About the Trump Admin
Nigerian Man Sentenced to Over 8 Years for International Inheritance Fraud Targeting Elder...
Florida's Crackdown on Non-English Speaking Drivers Is Hilarious
Family Fraud: Father, Two Daughters Convicted in $500k USDA Nutrition Program Scam
American Olympians Bash Their Own Country As Democrats and Media Gush
Speculation Into Iran Strike Continues As Warplanes Are Pulled From Super Bowl Flyover...
Tipsheet

Reading the Pre-War Intel Reports

Amanda Carpenter has a good post this morning about how Hillary Clinton didn't read the 2002 pre-war intelligence report.

This issue is near and dear to me because in 2004 I managed a Congressional race in North Dakota.  As you will read, we made the point that we believed our opponent, Rep. Earl Pomeroy, had not read the report:

Advertisement

"In his opening statement, he asked Pomeroy if he read the intelligence briefings before voting to approve the invasion of Iraq. Sand repeated that question through most of the 90-minute debate."

Of course, Pomeroy never did answer that question, and the press let him get away with it.  It didn't stick at all. 

To me, the fact that Members of Congress did not bother to read the intelligence reports -- before voting for war -- was a big issue.  But since Pomeroy voted for the war, the only way it would have been "newsworthy" is if we had opposed the war. 

Of course, running for president is a lot different than running for congress in North Dakota.  And the fact that, as a state senator, Obama opposed the war means that there is a clear contrast between the two.  Obama can always say: "Not only did she vote for the war -- but she didn't even read the reports before casting her vote."

 I wonder if it will stick ...


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement