FBI Had to Slap Down CBS News Over This Fake News Piece About...
Kash Patel Becomes the Focus of Media Analysis They Consistently Get Wrong
The Deplorable Treatment of Afghan Women Is a Glimpse Into Our Future
In Record Time, Voters Are Regretting Electing Socialist Mamdani
Steven Spielberg Flees California Before Its Billionaire Wealth Tax Fleeces Him
Oklahoma Bill Would Mandate Gun Safety Training in Public Schools
Here Is the Silver Lining to the Supreme Court's Tariff Ruling
CA Bends The Knee, Newsom Will Now Mandate English Proficiency Tests for Truck...
Oregon-Based Utility PacifiCorp Settles for $575M Over Six Devastating Wildfires
Armed Man Rammed Substation Near Las Vegas in Apparent Terror Plot Before Committing...
DOJ Moves to Strip U.S. Citizenship from Former North Miami Mayor Over Immigration...
DOJ Probes Three Michigan School Districts That Allegedly Teach Gender Ideology
5th Circuit Vacates Ruling That Blocked Louisiana's Mandate to Display 10 Commandments in...
Kansas Engineer Gets 29 Months for $1.2M Kickback Scheme on Nuclear Weapons Projects
DOJ Files Antitrust Lawsuit Against Ohio Healthcare Company
Tipsheet

SCOTUS Declines First Amendment Challenge From Massachusetts Teacher

SCOTUS Declines First Amendment Challenge From Massachusetts Teacher
AP Photo/Susan Walsh

On Monday, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) declined to hear a challenge from a teacher in Massachusetts who claims she lost her job after she created and reposted “anti-transgender” TikTok videos. 

Advertisement

The teacher, Kari MacRae, used to teach at Hanover Public Schools. Reportedly, the TikToks that got her terminated were made before she applied for a job at the district (via The Hill):

One post condemned Rachel Levine, the highest-ranking transgender official in the Biden administration. Another boasted a panda bear photo alongside text that read, “Dude, racism is stupid. I am black, white, and Asian. But everyone loves me.”

“I feel bad for parents nowadays,” another post read. “You have to be able to explain the birds & the bees . . . The bees & the bees . . . The birds & the birds . . . The birds that used to be bees . . . The bees that used to be birds . . . The birds that look like bees . . . Plus bees that look like birds but still got a stinger!!!”

Reportedly, no Supreme Court justice publicly dissented from the decision to turn away her appeal. But, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a seven-page statement claiming that he had concerns about a lower court’s decision to side against the teacher (via The Hill):

Advertisement

Related:

SUPREME COURT

“It undermines core First Amendment values to allow a government employer to adopt an institutional viewpoint on the issues of the day and then, when faced with a dissenting employee, portray this disagreement as evidence of disruption,” Thomas wrote. 

“And, the problem is exacerbated in the case of an employee such as MacRae, who expressed her views only outside the workplace and before her employment.”

MacRae was represented by Judicial Watch, who wrote in their petition that the case “could not be a more perfect vehicle for the Court to determine the rights of the tens-of-millions aspiring teachers who are participating in public affairs and the four million public-school teachers who spoke on matters of public concern before they were employed.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos