America at 250 Is Awesome Despite Our Problems
Annoy a Democrat, Celebrate America’s Birthday
The Highway to Hell Bill That’ll Raise Costs for Families
1776 vs. 2026
The Zara Effect
When Will Obama Say, 'What's Happened to My Party?'
Can We Stop the Slide Into Socialism?
The Transportation Bill That Proves Washington Can't Quit Clientelism
America at 250: The History We Rarely Tell
Another Dimwitted Democratic Socialist Defeats a Dumb Democrat
Common Sense Finally Wins in Girls' Sports
Why Congress Needs to Act Now on Legal Immigration Reform
America at 250: The Founding Principles That Still Make America Great
World Cup: U.S. Defeats Bosnia 2-0 to Advance in Electric Fashion
Tim Walz Helps Pardon Laotian Man Convicted of Raping 10-Year-Old
Tipsheet

A Town Was Fined for Refusing to Celebrate ‘Pride Month’

A Town Was Fined for Refusing to Celebrate ‘Pride Month’
Javier Galeano

A rural town on the border of Ontario and Minnesota was fined for refusing to celebrate “Pride Month” in June, according to a report from Fox News.

Reportedly, Emo, Ontario was found to have violated the Ontario Human Rights Code by the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario. The town has a population of about 1,300.

Advertisement

Emo did not proclaim June as Pride Month and was also issued a citation for its failure to fly "an LGBTQ2 rainbow flag,” Fox noted.

In addition to a $10,000 fine, officials from Emo were ordered to complete mandatory "human rights" training.

The National Post noted that the dispute began in 2020 when the town was approached by the group Borderland Pride with a written request to proclaim June as Pride Month. Attached to this letter was a draft proclamation, including statements like “pride is necessary to show community support and belonging for LGBTQ2 individuals” and “the diversity of sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression represents a positive contribution to society.”

The town was also asked to fly an “LGBTQ2 rainbow flag for a week of your choosing.”

Reportedly, Borderland Pride’s draft proclamation was tabled before a May 2020 meeting of the Emo Township Council, where it was defeated by a vote of three to two.

Borderland Pride claimed discrimination as a result. Reportedly, Emo Mayor Harold McQuaker was heard to say in a recording of the meeting, “There’s no flag being flown for the other side of the coin … there’s no flags being flown for the straight people.”

Advertisement

Related:

WOKENESS

These kinds of requests did not happen much in Emo, the Tribunal noted. 

“The record indicated the Township did not receive many requests for declarations or proclamations or requests for display of a flag,” the Tribunal decision read. In a single 12-month period they received four — two of which were from Borderland Pride.

Human Rights Tribunal vice-chair Karen Dawson also wrote, “I find this remark was demeaning and disparaging of the LGBTQ2 community of which Borderland Pride is a member and therefore constituted discrimination under the Code.”

There were five days of hearings into the case. During the hearings, Emily Saewyc, a professor at the University of British Columbia’s School of Nursing, spoke. She was reportedly cited as “an expert on the LGBTQ2 community.”

“Dr. Saewyc testified that one of the ways that negative speech contributes to harms is through tacitly encouraging others to imitate that discriminatory speech,” read the decision, which cited Saewyc’s claim that U.S. President Donald Trump inspired “hate and violence” against the LGBTQ community.

Advertisement

Ultimately, the Human Rights Tribunal ordered the Township to pay $10,000 to Borderland Pride, and for McQuaker to personally pay them another $5,000.

McQuaker and Emo’s chief administrative officer were also ordered to complete an online course known as “Human Rights 101” and “provide proof of completion … to Borderland Pride within 30 days.”

Reportedly, in a statement celebrating the decision, Borderland Pride noted that Emo joins both London and Hamilton in the category of Ontario communities that have been “sanctioned for refusing to adopt proclamations in support of their local Pride organizations.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos