Trump’s Texas Deal Dilemma
It’s Not Islamophobia, It’s Islamo-I’m-Sick-of-Hearing-About-It
CNN Proves False Narratives Are a Network Feature; WaPo Upset Photographers It Does...
Bombshell Federal Lawsuit Says Teachers Abused Students for Decades in Small Wisconsin Sch...
What If Those Iranian Bombs Had Nuclear Warheads
Between a Mullah and a Hard Place
Obama's Race-Hustling Eulogy at a Race Hustler's Funeral
The Religious, the Secular and the Truth
Democrats’ Latest Sacrificial Pawns
If Virginia Is for Lovers, There Is No Place for Tyrants
Florida Teens Accused of Plotting to Kill Classmate to Resurrect Sandy Hook Shooter
Farm Labor Company Operator Pleads Guilty to RICO Charge in Worker Exploitation Case
Venezuelan Man Accused of Assaulting Federal Agent, Grabbing Gun During Arrest in Michigan
This Major Insurance Company Agreed to Pay $117M Over Allegedly Overcharging Medicare for...
James Carville Admits He Has 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' — Says He Prays for...
Tipsheet

Florida Teen Wins Appeal to Seek An Abortion Without Parental Consent

Florida Teen Wins Appeal to Seek An Abortion Without Parental Consent
AP Photo/Melinda Deslatte

A teen in Tampa, Florida won an appeal in district court for the right to talk to a doctor and ultimately have a medical abortion without parental consent. 

Advertisement

According to local outlet Fox 13 Tampa Bay, the teen knew that her parents would not give consent for her to obtain an abortion. She petitioned for a judicial bypass to access information regarding a medication abortion pill and the ability to have the pill administered if she decides to do so. Florida law requires teenages under age 18 to have parental consent to undergo a medical abortion and to have the pill administered.

The teen, “Jane Doe,” had her request denied by Judge Jared Smith over concerns that she was not forthcoming regarding her GPA. Upon appeal, Judge Darryl Casanueva wrote for the 2–1 majority that she “demonstrates that she possesses an ability to assess the consequences of her choice and the risk it entails.”

“Identified in court records as Jane Doe, the teen's original petition to the court for a judicial bypass was denied, in part, because she did not meet the judge's intellectual standards.

The teen's attorney, Rinky Parwani, explained to the court that the 17-year-old Tampa high school junior works, pays for things she wants and needs (outside basic necessities provided by her father and sole caregiver, according to court records), and that she wants an abortion because she isn't yet financially stable.

He says his client wants to enlist in the military before going to college and becoming a nurse.

‘That is huge for these ladies that petition the court for this,’ said Parwani. ‘They do have futures, they understand that having a child may limit those futures in different ways.’

When considering a judicial bypass, a judge is to consider seven factors regarding the petitioner, including ‘overall intelligence; emotional development and stability; credibility and demeanor as a witness; ability to accept responsibility; ability to assess both the immediate and long-range consequences of the minor’s choices; and ability to understand and explain the medical risks of terminating her pregnancy and to apply that understanding to her decision.’”
Advertisement

Reportedly, Jane Doe told the court that she will gather information on an abortion procedure and if she follows through with it, her boyfriend will drive her to the clinic and his mother will pay for the procedure. She said if the procedure makes an emotional or physical impact, her boyfriend and his mother will help her through it.

"Any young teenage girl who is pregnant is already going through a huge emotional burden," Parwani told the court. "What is really fundamental in this decision is the court understood that she had resources available to her to make the right decision."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement