Portions of the Tapes Between Biden and Special Counsel Robert Hur Have Been...
Feds Paid a Visit to James Comey...and Escorted Him to DC Over...
Is This Why the Supreme Court Broke the Way It Did on the...
Tapper Gets a PR Massage, More Positive Yet 'Bad' Economic News, and Trump's...
The 764 War: What the FBI Knows and Keyboard Warriors Deny
Chinese Farmland in America
Pay for Pro Growth Tax Cuts by Ending the Credit Union Tax Loophole
Freedom Defined
New York Students Desperately Need Trump's Help
George Washington’s Vision for Confronting Anti-Semitism
State Attorney General Warns of Online 'Sextortion' Network that Targets Children
WaPo Complains 'Not Many Restaurants Left in D.C.' if ICE Enforces Immigration Laws
Tuberville Introduces Bill to Give Death Penalty to Illegals Who Kill Americans
Providence City Council Under Fire for Flying Palestinian Flag Linked to Hamas, Sparking...
Prosecutor Under Fire After Illegal Alien Kills Colorado Teen in Crash, Gets Probation
Tipsheet

Federal Appeals Court to Hear Texas Abortion Law Case in January

AP Photo/Steve Helber

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Louisiana, will hear oral arguments Jan. 7 in a case surrounding S.B. 8, a Texas law that bans abortions after fetal heartbeat detection. 

Advertisement

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals scheduled the hearing after the Supreme Court declined to block the enforcement of S.B. 8, as I covered, and returned the case back to the federal appeals court. While the Supreme Court said the Justice Department could not move forward with their lawsuit against S.B. 8, the Court said they will allow abortion providers in the case Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson to sue the state over the law.

"The court has decided that oral argument is appropriate before ruling on the state’s motion to certify or alternate motion to set a briefing schedule, and the response thereto. Consequently, the argument will be held at 9 am in New Orleans on Friday, January 7, 2022,” the appeals court said in a filing released on Monday.

Fifth Circuit Judge Stephen Higginson, an Obama-era appointee, disagreed with the court’s decision to hear the case.

“I respectfully disagree with the majority’s decision to hear oral argument on this remand from the United States Supreme Court. I do not read the Supreme Court’s judgment, especially in a case of this magnitude and acceleration, to countenance such delay,” Higginson said in his dissent on Monday. “I would immediately remand the case to the district court.”

Advertisement

In October, as I covered, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals countermanded U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman’s ruling that granted a temporary injunction over S.B. 8. In the two-day window where S.B. 8 was not in affect, some Texas clinics immediately began resuming abortions.

When the Supreme Court formally returned the lawsuit back to the Fifth Circuit, the abortion providers in the lawsuit requested that the case be acted on quickly and be sent directly back to to the District Court. The Supreme Court did not oblige.

In addition to banning abortions statewide after fetal heartbeat detection, which occurs around six weeks gestation, S.B. 8 allows private citizens to pursue legal action against anyone who provides an illegal abortion or aids or abets a woman seeking an illegal abortion. Those who successfully bring lawsuits under S.B. 8 can receive $10,000.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement