The Woke Billionaires and Democrat-Loving Corporations Are on Their Own
So, That's How The New York Times Framed the ICE Ambush in Minneapolis...
The Departure of Top DOJ Attorneys Allegedly Over the ICE Shooting in Minneapolis...
Remember When CNN Did Ride-Alongs With ICE? Here's the (D)ifference.
Watch Josh Hawley Corner This Lib Doctor on Biology
Why the FBI Searched a Washington Post Reporter's Home Yesterday
The Non-Profit Political Scam
St. Paul Teachers Union Orders Members to ‘Pick a Side’ and Walk Out...
Cea Weaver Identifies the 'Huge Problem' Obstructing Her Communist Housing Agenda, and Gue...
Here’s How Jasmine Crockett Handled Tough Questions About Her Double Standard
Standards? What Standards?
Tintin Was Deadly Wrong
Mamdani's Fantasy World of Equal Outcome
Iran Past, Present, and Future: A Conversation With Marziyeh Amirizadeh, Part 2
Tearing Down Our History
Tipsheet

Federal Appeals Court to Hear Texas Abortion Law Case in January

AP Photo/Steve Helber

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Louisiana, will hear oral arguments Jan. 7 in a case surrounding S.B. 8, a Texas law that bans abortions after fetal heartbeat detection. 

Advertisement

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals scheduled the hearing after the Supreme Court declined to block the enforcement of S.B. 8, as I covered, and returned the case back to the federal appeals court. While the Supreme Court said the Justice Department could not move forward with their lawsuit against S.B. 8, the Court said they will allow abortion providers in the case Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson to sue the state over the law.

"The court has decided that oral argument is appropriate before ruling on the state’s motion to certify or alternate motion to set a briefing schedule, and the response thereto. Consequently, the argument will be held at 9 am in New Orleans on Friday, January 7, 2022,” the appeals court said in a filing released on Monday.

Fifth Circuit Judge Stephen Higginson, an Obama-era appointee, disagreed with the court’s decision to hear the case.

“I respectfully disagree with the majority’s decision to hear oral argument on this remand from the United States Supreme Court. I do not read the Supreme Court’s judgment, especially in a case of this magnitude and acceleration, to countenance such delay,” Higginson said in his dissent on Monday. “I would immediately remand the case to the district court.”

Advertisement

Related:

PRO LIFE

In October, as I covered, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals countermanded U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman’s ruling that granted a temporary injunction over S.B. 8. In the two-day window where S.B. 8 was not in affect, some Texas clinics immediately began resuming abortions.

When the Supreme Court formally returned the lawsuit back to the Fifth Circuit, the abortion providers in the lawsuit requested that the case be acted on quickly and be sent directly back to to the District Court. The Supreme Court did not oblige.

In addition to banning abortions statewide after fetal heartbeat detection, which occurs around six weeks gestation, S.B. 8 allows private citizens to pursue legal action against anyone who provides an illegal abortion or aids or abets a woman seeking an illegal abortion. Those who successfully bring lawsuits under S.B. 8 can receive $10,000.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos