The NRCC Has Raised a Ton of Cash in 2026
The Replies to This Cenk Uygur Tweet About Ed Gallrein Were Brutal
Iran Threatens War 'Beyond the Region' if the US Resumes Attacks
The Rich Save What the Government Destroys
The AP Is Jealous of Pentagon Food Court Workers; LA Times Says a...
If Voter Fraud Doesn't Happen, Why Is Spanberger Blocking Feds From Polling Places?
A Book About the Threats to the Truth by AI Contains False Content...
Civil Liberties Group Sues Illinois Over FOID Requirement
A Bill Maher Guest Argued That China Has 'Freedom' It's Just a Different...
When Political Violence Becomes Acceptable, It Becomes Inevitable
Former Execs Plead Guilty to Helping Tech-Support Scammers Steal from Elderly Americans
3 Dead, 18 First Responders Quarantined After Exposure to Mystery Substance in New...
Moscow-Based Crime Ring Members Get Prison Time in $2B Healthcare Fraud Case
Doctor Allegedly Used $45M of Medicare Fraud Money on Trips, Cybertruck, and $12,000...
Michigan Woman Faces 20 Years After Pleading Guilty to $4.6M Child Modeling Scam
Tipsheet
Premium

USA Today Quietly Removes Sen. John Kennedy's Op-ed

USA Today Quietly Removes Sen. John Kennedy's Op-ed
AP Photo/Alex Brandon

It’s not the first time an opinion piece from a U.S. senator has caused a stir. Four years ago during the height of the George Floyd riots, Sen. Tom Cotton penned a piece in The New York Times calling on the nation to restore order by sending in the troops. After causing a revolt among Times staff and criticism from readers, the paper issued a lengthy editor’s note concluding that they never should have published it in the first place. But they did leave the piece up, noting that “the basic arguments advanced by Senator Cotton — however objectionable people may find them — represent a newsworthy part of the current debate.” 

While despicable, the Gannett-owned USA Today Network may have the Times beat.  

On May 11, Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) ran a column with The Shreveport Times and seven other USA Today publications in Louisiana on protecting women’s sports from biological males. But days later, it was quietly removed. Instead of issuing an editor’s note, as was the case with the Times, readers were simply given a “404” error message. 

When pressed, Kennedy’s office was told the op-ed, which was later picked up by National Review, was taken down over “loaded language” and the use of the phrase “biological male.”  

Many fair-minded people reject the idea that women and girls who work hard to develop their athletic talents must sacrifice their opportunities, privacy, and safety to promote gender activism. I’m one of them.

Louisiana is full of fair-minded people. We recognize that it’s common sense for boys and girls to compete in separate leagues. That’s why a bipartisan coalition in the Louisiana legislature passed the Fairness in Women’s Sports Act to prevent biological boys from competing against biological girls in our elementary and high schools and from sharing their locker rooms.

Protecting women and girls in sports doesn’t need to be a partisan issue. Congress should follow Louisiana’s leadership and do more to protect girls, their sports, their scholarships, and their futures from a social experiment that is already proving to be unwise. (National Review)

“[The] USA Today Network apparently does not like the way I express myself,” the senator told Fox News in a statement. “They think they are the speech police. Drunk on certainty and virtue, they think they are our moral teacher. This attitude is why so many Americans have lost confidence in the media. The media is not going to win that trust back until they return to neutrality instead of advocacy. Most people don’t support allowing biological men to participate in women’s sports because they think that will bastardize sports, skew the results, and hurt women. Other people disagree. Gannett should simply report the two sides and not try to silence the position it disagrees with.”

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement