Saquon Barkley Had an Unsettling Event at His Home Over the Weekend
Watch Tom Homan Expertly Slap Down This Silly Question From a CBS News...
The Latest Slate of Polls Is Brutal for Dems
Never Forget That Zohran Mamdani Believes Israel Is Not a Country
Suspect Arrested After 'Incendiary Device' Goes Off Outside New York Federal Building
We Should Thank Kamala Harris for Exposing Tim Walz and Minnesota Democrats
Obama-Appointed Activist Judge Dismisses Title IX Lawsuit Against Illinois School District
Secretary of State Rubio Gave the Best Explanation for Why Iran Is in...
Democrats Launch Renewed Attack on School Choice
It Doesn't Look Like Things Are Going Well for the James Talarico Campaign
The RNC Just Trolled Maine Democrats for Their Disastrous Senate Race
Caught on Their Own Emails
The Statue of Liberty Now Watches Over America's Biggest Welfare State
Hasan Piker Calls For an Ideological Purge of the Democratic Party—Dressed Like Mao—in...
Iranian Government Deeply Divided As Strikes Rage on, Rubio Explains
Tipsheet

Vance Identifies 3 Major Problems With the Senate's Foreign Aid Package

Vance Identifies 3 Major Problems With the Senate's Foreign Aid Package
AP Photo/Jay LaPrete

Update: The Senate passed the measure, 70-29, early Tuesday morning with the help of 22 Republicans.  

Advertisement

Original Post: 

Republican Sen. J.D. Vance of Ohio has been sounding the alarm about the Senate’s foreign aid package for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan, warning the measure is not only bad policy, it's also “anti-democratic.”

Speaking to Tucker Carlson in an interview published Monday evening, the Ohio Republican said he hopes that even if the legislation passes the Senate, that it dies in the House, listing three major problems with it. 

First, the bill sends $61 billion to Ukraine to fund a “hopeless war” that will “decimate the Ukrainian population” even more than it has already done. 

“It's a terrible, terrible piece of legislation on the policy,” he said. 

Secondly, the measure does not just fund the war-torn country in 2024, Vance emphasized. 

“It actually funds Ukraine in ‘25 and ’26,” he said. “Now, what's the problem with that? Say, for example, that we have a new president in 2025, that president would be handcuffed by the promises that we are making in law to Ukraine today. If you go back to 2019, Tucker, to sort of give you a sense of why this matters. In 2019, the US House impeached then-President Donald Trump on the theory that they had appropriated money to Ukraine, and Donald Trump refused to send it to Ukraine. So if Trump is elected president again and becomes president on January of 2025, he will conduct diplomacy. And if that diplomacy does not include sending additional billions to Ukraine, there is a theoretical argument, a predicate, if you will, for impeaching Donald Trump because they have tried to tie his hands.” 

Advertisement

Related:

UKRAINE

Finally, pointing to leaks from the intelligence community, the entire purpose of the bill “is to tie a future President Trump’s hands,” he said. 

“We're not just sending billions to Ukraine in 2024. We're trying to make it impossible for the next president to conduct diplomacy on his terms. It's anti-democratic, and it will lead to endless war in all over the world,” Vance argued. 

The senator on Monday sent a memo detailing these points to his colleagues, urging Republicans to vote against the legislation. 

House Speaker Mike Johnson has issued warnings of his own, emphasizing the need to address the border.



Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement