Online Lib Lawyers: Dumb or Lying?
Hey, National Republicans, Should Look at How the TN GOP Handled Business
CNN Analyst Delivered a BIG Reality Check for Dems Yesterday
Dems Are Looking to Redistrict Delaware. There's Only One Problem.
John Thune Is Reminding Republican Voters Why He Sucks
A Louisiana Restaurant Shut Down Permanently Over What Lurked in Its Walk-in Freezer
South Carolina's State Senate Leader Said What Now About Why He's Against...
Bad Medicine Could Be in Store for MI's El-Sayed Over Issues Concerning His...
The Thing That Works
We Just Learned More About the Man Hit by a Frontier Airlines Plane,...
TN State Rep. Justin Pearson Is Not Happy He Faced Consequences for His...
Scott Jennings Schools Dem Strategist on GOP Redistricting
Networks Manufacture a Mini-Scandal Over a 'Road Trip'
The Greatest Time to Be Alive in America Is Right Now
Retirement Options for the Middle Class
Tipsheet

Texas AG Responds After SCOTUS Sides With Biden Admin in Razor Wire Dispute

Texas AG Responds After SCOTUS Sides With Biden Admin in Razor Wire Dispute
AP Photo/Tony Gutierrez, File

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton vowed to continue fighting after the Supreme Court on Monday allowed Border Patrol to continue cutting razor wire Texas had installed to deter illegal border crossers. 

Advertisement

“The Supreme Court’s temporary order allows Biden to continue his illegal effort to aid the foreign invasion of America,” Attorney General Paxton said in a statement. “The destruction of Texas’s border barriers will not help enforce the law or keep American citizens safe. This fight is not over, and I look forward to defending our state’s sovereignty.” 

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined the liberal justices on the bench in the 5-4 decision. 

Paxton had sued the administration in October over its damaging of the wire, accusing the administration of disrupting state efforts to secure the border and damaging the ability to deter illegal entry.

The Biden administration has argued that once migrants are on U.S. soil, Border Patrol agents must apprehend them, and has claimed the wire "inhibits Border Patrol’s ability to patrol the border." The administration has also argued that federal immigration law supersedes Texas' own efforts to control the border.

A Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals panel had granted a request for a preliminary injunction. The DOJ had asked the Supreme Court for temporary relief so that it could remove razor fence at the federal government’s discretion.

"The court of appeals’ contrary ruling inverts the Supremacy Clause by requiring federal law to yield to Texas law," its application to the Court argued. "If accepted, the court’s rationale would leave the United States at the mercy of States that could seek to force the federal government to conform the implementation of federal immigration law to varying state-law regimes." (Fox News)

Advertisement

The release from Paxton’s office emphasized the order is temporary since the appeal is ongoing. The Attorney General will argue the case on Feb. 7 before the Fifth Circuit. 

This is not the only conflict between Texas and the Biden administration over immigration. The federal government is also suing the state over a recently signed law making illegal border crossing a state crime. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement