Kash Patel Did What? Did The Atlantic Publish Another Fake News Piece Again?
Good News: These Two Supreme Court Justices Are NOT Retiring
I'm Sure Republicans Were Happy to Hear This News Regarding Their 2026 Midterm...
Watch CNBC's Joe Kernen Wreck Hakeem Jeffries' Anti-Trump Talking Points Over the Economy
The Dems' Virginia Redistricting Push Still in Limbo As Election Day Nears
Look at Scott Jennings' Face When Kamala Harris Former Comms Director Said This...
Success in Iran Causing Plunging Oil Prices Is Bad News
My Ancestor Fought for Islam at the Battle of the Alamo?
You Don't Have to Agree With Me Politically to Work Here
Misguided ‘Repair the World’ Climate Philanthropy
Deplorable Democrat Lawfare Just Came for This Trump Attorney
The End of the Charade: IOC Enforces Biology in Women's Sports and Restores...
Get to the Root of America’s Health Crisis: Start With Food in Hospitals
Crime, Depression, and What to Do About It
Fix the Problem, Not the Blame
Tipsheet

Texas AG Responds After SCOTUS Sides With Biden Admin in Razor Wire Dispute

Texas AG Responds After SCOTUS Sides With Biden Admin in Razor Wire Dispute
AP Photo/Tony Gutierrez, File

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton vowed to continue fighting after the Supreme Court on Monday allowed Border Patrol to continue cutting razor wire Texas had installed to deter illegal border crossers. 

Advertisement

“The Supreme Court’s temporary order allows Biden to continue his illegal effort to aid the foreign invasion of America,” Attorney General Paxton said in a statement. “The destruction of Texas’s border barriers will not help enforce the law or keep American citizens safe. This fight is not over, and I look forward to defending our state’s sovereignty.” 

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined the liberal justices on the bench in the 5-4 decision. 

Paxton had sued the administration in October over its damaging of the wire, accusing the administration of disrupting state efforts to secure the border and damaging the ability to deter illegal entry.

The Biden administration has argued that once migrants are on U.S. soil, Border Patrol agents must apprehend them, and has claimed the wire "inhibits Border Patrol’s ability to patrol the border." The administration has also argued that federal immigration law supersedes Texas' own efforts to control the border.

A Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals panel had granted a request for a preliminary injunction. The DOJ had asked the Supreme Court for temporary relief so that it could remove razor fence at the federal government’s discretion.

"The court of appeals’ contrary ruling inverts the Supremacy Clause by requiring federal law to yield to Texas law," its application to the Court argued. "If accepted, the court’s rationale would leave the United States at the mercy of States that could seek to force the federal government to conform the implementation of federal immigration law to varying state-law regimes." (Fox News)

Advertisement

The release from Paxton’s office emphasized the order is temporary since the appeal is ongoing. The Attorney General will argue the case on Feb. 7 before the Fifth Circuit. 

This is not the only conflict between Texas and the Biden administration over immigration. The federal government is also suing the state over a recently signed law making illegal border crossing a state crime. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos