So What If Targeting Jerome Powell Is Politically Motivated?
Wait, That's the Reasoning Behind Minnesota's Anti-ICE Lawsuit Against the Federal Governm...
Why Are So Many Leftists Such Trash?
Chevron Showdown: Supreme Court Weighs Energy Lawfare and Rogue Courts
In Reelection Launch, Josh Shapiro Admits Violent Attack Almost Drove Him From the...
Will Eric Swalwell Be Killed Off the Ballot?
It Depends on Where You Stand
Something Doesn’t Add Up
America’s Choice: A Civil Society or Dangerous Insurrection!
Are You Being Baited Into Rage?
Dignity for Thee—Not for Me
Kids’ Winter Cure for Nature Deficit Disorder
Regime Change in Venezuela: Key to Global Advance of Democracy and Peace
Trump Imposes 'Immediate' Tariffs on Iranian Trade Partners As Anti-Regime Protests Grow
Meta Taps Trump Ally for High Level Job
Tipsheet

Texas AG Responds After SCOTUS Sides With Biden Admin in Razor Wire Dispute

AP Photo/Tony Gutierrez, File

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton vowed to continue fighting after the Supreme Court on Monday allowed Border Patrol to continue cutting razor wire Texas had installed to deter illegal border crossers. 

Advertisement

“The Supreme Court’s temporary order allows Biden to continue his illegal effort to aid the foreign invasion of America,” Attorney General Paxton said in a statement. “The destruction of Texas’s border barriers will not help enforce the law or keep American citizens safe. This fight is not over, and I look forward to defending our state’s sovereignty.” 

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined the liberal justices on the bench in the 5-4 decision. 

Paxton had sued the administration in October over its damaging of the wire, accusing the administration of disrupting state efforts to secure the border and damaging the ability to deter illegal entry.

The Biden administration has argued that once migrants are on U.S. soil, Border Patrol agents must apprehend them, and has claimed the wire "inhibits Border Patrol’s ability to patrol the border." The administration has also argued that federal immigration law supersedes Texas' own efforts to control the border.

A Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals panel had granted a request for a preliminary injunction. The DOJ had asked the Supreme Court for temporary relief so that it could remove razor fence at the federal government’s discretion.

"The court of appeals’ contrary ruling inverts the Supremacy Clause by requiring federal law to yield to Texas law," its application to the Court argued. "If accepted, the court’s rationale would leave the United States at the mercy of States that could seek to force the federal government to conform the implementation of federal immigration law to varying state-law regimes." (Fox News)

Advertisement

The release from Paxton’s office emphasized the order is temporary since the appeal is ongoing. The Attorney General will argue the case on Feb. 7 before the Fifth Circuit. 

This is not the only conflict between Texas and the Biden administration over immigration. The federal government is also suing the state over a recently signed law making illegal border crossing a state crime. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement