You Won't Believe What Nancy Pelosi Told Don Lemon After His Arrest
We Now Know Whether ICE Will Show Up to the Super Bowl
Miami's Democrat Mayor Just Admitted She's Undermining Immigration Laws
Antisemitic Incidents Skyrocket on Mamdani's Watch
Media Critique of Firearm Industry Protection Bill Misses Major Point
Israeli-American Hostage Keith Siegel Reunites With His Wife at the White House, Thanks...
This Law Firm Says Singer's Admission of 'Stolen Land’ Gives Native American Tribe...
Comedian Ben Bankas Has Six Sold-Out Minnesota Shows Canceled Due to a Renee...
House Hearing Explodes as Rep. Meeks Shouts at Scott Bessent: 'Stop Covering for...
Warning Signs for Republicans in 2026
Utah Man Pleads Guilty to $89M Investment Fraud That Targeted Over 200 Victims
Attempted Trump Assassin Sentenced To Life Following Federal Trial
U.S. Rep. Barry Loudermilk Won’t Seek Reelection
Secret Service Sweeps Cities Nationwide To Shut Down EBT Skimming Fraud
Jury Nails Ex-NFL Player Who Allegedly Defrauded Medicare of Nearly $200M
Tipsheet

Texas Ordered to Remove Buoys From Rio Grande. Here's What Abbott Did Next.

AP Photo/Dario Lopez-Mills

A federal judge ruled Wednesday that Texas must remove a 1,000-foot floating barrier in the Rio Grande by Sept. 15.  

The barrier, meant to deter illegal immigration, was installed in July as part of Operation Lone Star, but immediately faced backlash from both Mexico and the Biden administration, which sued Texas that month arguing the federal government has sole jurisdiction over the Rio Grande. 

Advertisement

In a 42-page ruling, [Judge David A.] Ezra, a Reagan appointee, found that the barrier violates the federal Rivers and Harbors Act by creating an obstruction in the river that makes it impossible to navigate.

Texas disagreed. In court documents, lawyers for Texas said the barrier doesn’t decrease the ability to navigate that portion of the Rio Grande.

They also defended the barrier as an enforcement tool, saying it was necessary to block migrants and drugs such as fentanyl from entering the state, arguing that the Biden administration’s immigration policies had failed to do so. A recent Wall Street Journal report found, however, that migrants weren’t deterred by the barrier—they just waded through the river right around it. Federal law-enforcement officials have also said that fentanyl is rarely smuggled into the U.S. by a person crossing the border illegally; it is nearly all driven in by U.S. citizens or other visitors with visas at legal ports of entry.

Texas also presented a more controversial and untested legal argument: that the U.S. Constitution allows states to defend their sovereignty in the case of a “foreign invasion.”

Ezra rejected that argument. “Whether Texas’ claim of ‘invasion’ is legitimate is a…political question” that can’t be decided by a court, he wrote.

“Gov. [Greg] Abbott announced that he was not ‘asking for permission’ for Operation Lone Star,” Ezra wrote. “Unfortunately for Texas, permission is exactly what federal law requires before installing obstructions in the nation’s navigable waters.” (WSJ)

Advertisement

While the DOJ said it was "pleased" with the ruling, Abbott fired back within an hour of it posting, appealing to the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.

"Today’s court decision merely prolongs President Biden’s willful refusal to acknowledge that Texas is rightfully stepping up to do the job that he should have been doing all along," his office said in a statement. "This ruling is incorrect and will be overturned on appeal. We will continue to utilize every strategy to secure the border, including deploying Texas National Guard solders and Department of Public Safety troopers and installing strategic barriers. Our battle to defend Texas’ sovereign authority to protect lives from the chaos caused by President Biden’s open border policies has only begun. Texas is prepared to take this fight all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.”


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos