Savages vs. Civilization
*THAT* Is Not a Good Sign for Dems Regarding the 2026 Midterms
Here's What Former Judge Hannah Dugan Tried to Argue to Get Her Obstruction...
It's Over. Here's Who Won the Alabama Republican Senate Runoff
Magic Medicine?
Daily Beast Cites the 'Scandal' of a Comedian Attending a UFC Fight; Press...
Who Will Be Held Accountable for the Border Policies of the Biden Years?
What Can I Say?
The Hollywood Left Shamelessly Lies for 'the First Amendment'
Everyone Should Be Free To Stay In or Get Out Of Social Security
Bernie Sanders Wants Your Great-Grandkids to Pay to Feed Your Kids
The Wall That Wasn't: The Establishment Clause From Everson to Kennedy
Why Jordan Must Extradite Ahlam Tamimi and Why America Must Insist
When My Trad Dad Discovered What His Idiot Son Flushed Down the Toilet
Look Who These Democrats Are Supporting in the World Cup. Hint: It's Not...
Tipsheet

Texas Ordered to Remove Buoys From Rio Grande. Here's What Abbott Did Next.

Texas Ordered to Remove Buoys From Rio Grande. Here's What Abbott Did Next.
AP Photo/Dario Lopez-Mills

A federal judge ruled Wednesday that Texas must remove a 1,000-foot floating barrier in the Rio Grande by Sept. 15.  

The barrier, meant to deter illegal immigration, was installed in July as part of Operation Lone Star, but immediately faced backlash from both Mexico and the Biden administration, which sued Texas that month arguing the federal government has sole jurisdiction over the Rio Grande. 

Advertisement

In a 42-page ruling, [Judge David A.] Ezra, a Reagan appointee, found that the barrier violates the federal Rivers and Harbors Act by creating an obstruction in the river that makes it impossible to navigate.

Texas disagreed. In court documents, lawyers for Texas said the barrier doesn’t decrease the ability to navigate that portion of the Rio Grande.

They also defended the barrier as an enforcement tool, saying it was necessary to block migrants and drugs such as fentanyl from entering the state, arguing that the Biden administration’s immigration policies had failed to do so. A recent Wall Street Journal report found, however, that migrants weren’t deterred by the barrier—they just waded through the river right around it. Federal law-enforcement officials have also said that fentanyl is rarely smuggled into the U.S. by a person crossing the border illegally; it is nearly all driven in by U.S. citizens or other visitors with visas at legal ports of entry.

Texas also presented a more controversial and untested legal argument: that the U.S. Constitution allows states to defend their sovereignty in the case of a “foreign invasion.”

Ezra rejected that argument. “Whether Texas’ claim of ‘invasion’ is legitimate is a…political question” that can’t be decided by a court, he wrote.

“Gov. [Greg] Abbott announced that he was not ‘asking for permission’ for Operation Lone Star,” Ezra wrote. “Unfortunately for Texas, permission is exactly what federal law requires before installing obstructions in the nation’s navigable waters.” (WSJ)

Advertisement

While the DOJ said it was "pleased" with the ruling, Abbott fired back within an hour of it posting, appealing to the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.

"Today’s court decision merely prolongs President Biden’s willful refusal to acknowledge that Texas is rightfully stepping up to do the job that he should have been doing all along," his office said in a statement. "This ruling is incorrect and will be overturned on appeal. We will continue to utilize every strategy to secure the border, including deploying Texas National Guard solders and Department of Public Safety troopers and installing strategic barriers. Our battle to defend Texas’ sovereign authority to protect lives from the chaos caused by President Biden’s open border policies has only begun. Texas is prepared to take this fight all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.”


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement