Pre-Election Special SALE: 60% Off VIP Membership
BREAKING: Supreme Court Rules on Whether Virginia Can Remove Non-Citizens From Voter Rolls
Tim Walz's Gaming Session With Ocasio-Cortez Was a Trainwreck
Oregon Predicates Request to Judge on Self-Delusion
GDP Report Shows Economy 'Weaker Than Expected'
How Trump Plans to Help Compensate Victims of 'Migrant Crime'
NRCC Blasts the Left's Voter Suppression Efforts in Battleground Districts
Watch Trump's Reaction to Finding Out Biden Called His Supporters 'Garbage'
Scott Jennings Calls Out CNN Host, Panelists Trying to Desperately Explain Away Biden's...
There Was a Vile, Violent Attack in Chicago, and the Media's Been Silent....
One Red State Just Acquired a Massive Amount of Land to Secure Its...
Poll Out of Texas Shows That Harris Rally Sure Didn't Work for Colin...
This Hollywood Actor Is Persuading Christian Men to Vote for Kamala Harris
Is the Trump Campaign Over-Confident?
Is This Really How the Kamala HQ Is Going to Respond to Biden’s...
Tipsheet
Premium

Is This a Sign GOP Support for Ukraine Aid Is Coming to an End?

Harry Hamburg

President Biden’s call for more emergency aid for Ukraine may not get the support he hopes for, as Republicans who previously supported U.S. assistance for the war-torn country are beginning to change their tune. 

The president’s most recent ask from Congress—for $24 billion—includes funding for security, economic, and humanitarian assistance. Previous requests have been green-lit thanks to bipartisan support, but this is the first time Biden will ask lawmakers to send more weapons since Republicans took control of the lower chamber. 

But a sign the tide is turning among the GOP was seen this week when Republican Rep. Andy Harris of Maryland told his constituents that it’s time to be realistic about U.S. spending for Ukraine.

“Is this more a stalemate? Should we be realistic about it? I think we probably should,” he said on Tuesday, according to Politico. 

Of Ukraine’s springtime offensive, the Republican said, “it’s failed,” and he was highly skeptical about how the conflict will end: “I'm not sure it's winnable anymore.”

Why are his comments any different than GOP hardliners on the issue? Politico explains:

Why he’s different: Those are not unconventional views for a member of the hard-right House Freedom Caucus, of which Harris is a longtime member. But Harris is also a co-chair of the Congressional Ukraine Caucus whose Ukrainian mother fled communist Eastern Europe after World War II.

He remained steadfast in his support for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy through the early months of the war and voted for Congress’s big standalone Ukraine aid package last year, backing both military aid and humanitarian aid for the tiny nation in its Goliath-sized fight against Russia.

Harris is also a senior member of the House Appropriations Committee, giving him an outsize voice in his party’s spending priorities.

Asked in an interview after the town hall whether he’d support another tranche of aid, he sharply hedged: “If there is humanitarian monies, nonmilitary monies, or military monies without an inspector general, I’m not supporting it.”

A conservative’s qualms: Harris’s new tone on Ukraine aid is one more sign of the GOP's shifting ground on the issue. And it’s a preview of just how much of a headache the issue will be for Speaker Kevin McCarthy when lawmakers return from recess next month. (Politico)

Among Harris' concerns is the cost amid trillion-dollar U.S. deficits, a concern other Republicans have been voicing since day one. 

“I’m sorry, we don’t have that kind of money,” Harris said.

"I think the time has come to realistically call for peace talks. I know President Zelenskyy doesn’t want it,” Harris told his constituents. “But President Zelenskyy, without our help, he would abjectly lose the war. And with our help, he’s not winning. It’s a stalemate now.”

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement