I Like JD Vance So Much That I Want Him Primaried Hard
Here's the Trump Administration's Latest Salvo Against the Federal Reserve
Wait, How Much of the US Budget Is Stolen Every Year? Scott Bessent...
Ilhan Omar Spewed a WHOPPER About the ICE Shooting in Minneapolis on Face...
What This MS Now Guest Said About ICE and Firearms Was Peak Stupidity
With Iran on Fire, Trump Says They're Looking Into 'Very Strong Options' on...
Democrats Are Making a New Martyr
The Embodiment of Lawfare
Ecofeminist Once Declared Steak a Tool of White Supremacy
Can Republicans Defy History in 2026?
Watching History Unfold
Conflicting Thoughts on Venezuela From a Pat Buchanan and Ron Paul Noninterventionist
Will President Trump Push for Real Change at CNN?
Iran Does Not Need a Crown — It Needs a Republic
Litigation Funding Helps Level the Legal Playing Field
Tipsheet

'Unbelievable': Phone Data That Could Have Helped Identify J6 Pipe Bomber Was 'Corrupted'

AP Photo/Alex Brandon

House Republicans sent a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray on Wednesday outlining concerns about the agency’s handling of the investigation into the suspect who planted the pipe bombs near the RNC and DNC on January 5, 2021.

Advertisement

In the letter, Reps. Thomas Massie (R-KY), Andy Biggs (R-AZ), Jim Jordan (R-OH), and Barry Loudermilk (R-GA) detail how the Judiciary Committee conducted a transcribed interview with Steven D’Antuono, the former Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI’s Washington Field Office, who oversaw investigations into the events at the Capitol on January 6. 

During that conversation, D’Antuono explained why geofencing technology that would typically help identify a suspect has not been fruitful in this case. One issue is that the agency isn’t even sure if the suspect was using a real phone or whether it was a “ruse.” Secondly, some data from geofencing was “corrupted.” 

So the – there's a lot of phone data that came in. Yes, I've seen the same video. I've watched the same video. We put out the same video. It looks like a phone. Was it a real phone, a not a real phone, was it a ruse? Was it a – you know, I picked up my phone several times at meetings going, oh, yeah, I got to take this call, and walk out, right. The phone's not on, right. So was the person just sitting there trying to pretend like they're on a bench taking a phone call? We don't know until we find the person, right, and ask them those questions.
 
We did a complete geofence. We have complete data. Not complete, because there's some data that was corrupted by one of the providers, not purposely by them, right. It just – unusual circumstance that we have corrupt data from one of the providers. I'm not sure – I can't remember right now which one. But for that day, which is awful because we don't have that information to search. So could it have been that provider? Yeah, with our luck, you know, with this investigation it probably was, right. So maybe if we did have that – that data wasn't corrupted – and it wasn't purposely corrupted. I don't want any conspiracy theories, right. To my knowledge, it wasn't corrupted, you know, but that could have been good information that we don't have, right. So that is painful for us to not to have that. So we looked at everything. (Judiciary Committee)

Advertisement

Another point of concern is that D’Antuono revealed he doesn't even know if the FBI interviewed the person who discovered the pipe bomb at the DNC, though he admitted it would be “investigation 101” to interview such individuals. 

Since Wray has thus far failed to respond to the Judiciary Committee’s request for a briefing about the pipe bomb investigation, the lawmakers conclude their letter reiterating that appeal and ask for a number of documents related to the incident. 

The lawmakers set a deadline of June 28, 2023, for the information requested. 


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement