New Emails Show the Biden White House Coordinated Directly With the DOJ to...
DNC Reveals Why They're Keeping Their 2024 Autopsy Under Seal. Get Ready to...
How 'John' the Homeless Guy Solved the Brown University Shooting
How You Know the Lib Media Realizes There's Nothing in the Epstein Files...
The View Co-Host Drops Embarrassingly Shameful Take on Trump's Bonuses to Our Troops
Trump Knew What He Was Doing With This Move on the Kennedy Center
Trump Just Made a Move That Would Make JFK Proud
Can the Dark Ages Return?
As America Turns 250, Here's How One Content Creator Is Making Patriotism Shareable...
Guess Who Rachel Maddow Blames for Undoing 30 Years of HIV/AIDS Prevention Work
Markwayne Mullin Just Nuked Bernie Sanders for Refusing to Help Kids With Cancer
Buyer's Remorse? Chicago Cardinal Blase Cupich Blasts State for Healthcare Worker Abortion...
Jimmy Kimmel’s Year From Hell (According To Jimmy Kimmel)
Zohran Mamdani Appointee Resigns After Antisemitic Social Media Posts Resurface
You Won't Believe What the Australian PM's Solution to the Bondi Beach Terror...
Tipsheet
Premium

Historian Makes a Prediction the Left Won't Like About 2024

AP Photo/Patrick Semansky

It's probably too early for predictions about 2024—after all, we're still 18 months away. Anything could happen in that span of time to completely upend the race. Still, the forecasts are coming, and we now have one from historian Niall Ferguson about Donald Trump's chances of becoming president again. 

Democrats are banking on Joe Biden defeating Trump, who's bogged down in one legal fight after another, but according to Ferguson, he's just "Act II" in a traditional play. Act III? That's Trump, the historian argues in The Spectator: "he's the next president." 

Ferguson, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, first outlines why the legal challenges don't preclude Trump from being successful in 2024, pointing to various political figures throughout the world that have made political comebacks following conviction or even imprisonment. 

Secondly, Trump is the clear frontrunner in the GOP field right now, far ahead of where Gov. Ron DeSantis is, even though he hasn't officially entered the race. 

In recent GOP political history, early frontrunners won the Republican primaries in most competitive races since 1972, but the exceptions were John McCain in '08 and Trump in '16. 

"The Republican primary process favours candidates with early leads because most states award delegates on a 'winner takes all' or 'winner takes most' basis," Ferguson writes. "If Trump maintains his current average polling numbers through the first half of 2023 but doesn't become the Republicans' choice for president, he would be the highest-polling candidate ever to fail to secure the nomination. He would join Ted Kennedy, Ed Muskie, Rudy Giuliani, Hillary Clinton (in her 2008 bid) and Scott Walker in the Failed Frontrunners club. Conversely, if Ron DeSantis beats Trump to the nomination, it would be a bigger upset than Barack Obama's victory over Hillary Clinton in 2008. In short, unless the Republican party has somehow morphed into the Democratic party, the GOP nomination is now Trump's to lose."

Ferguson goes on to note that a Biden vs. Trump matchup doesn't guarantee the incumbent wins, as the current commander-in-chief isn't very popular, while Trump isn't that unpopular and is "less so than at this point eight years ago."

And if a recession occurs, Biden's likely done since "no president since Calvin Coolidge a century ago has secured re-election if a recession has occurred in the two years before the nation votes."

Barring any major surprises, Ferguson says, "History is clear – the Republican frontrunner usually wins the nomination, and a post-recession incumbent usually loses the presidential election." 

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement