Our Gift to You This Holiday Season
This Democrat Made a Huge Mistake When Celebrating Jasmine Crockett's Endorsement
British Citizens Are in an Abusive Relationship With Their Government
The Rules for California Stop at Gavin Newsom’s Driveway
BLM Co-Founder Arrested on Domestic Assault Charges
JD Vance Calls for GOP Unity, Touts Trump Agenda at AmericaFest 2025
America’s Food Stamp Program Mostly Runs on Outdated Technology
Coast Guard Intercepts Third Venezuelan Oil Tanker
Lawlessness in Seattle: Elderly Woman Blinded in Attack by Career Criminal
Hakeem Jeffries Dodges Question on Poll Showing Democrats at 18% Approval
7 Charged in $775K SNAP Fraud Scheme at Pennsylvania Convenience Store
Rand Paul Isn't Liking Trump's Decision to Seize Venezuelan Ships
Two Romanian Nationals Indicted in Oregon SNAP Fraud Scheme Allegedly Stealing Over $160,0...
USPS Chicago Employee Charged With Collecting $51K in Fraudulent Benefits, Feds Say
The Geese Are Being Stolen From Parks Again
Tipsheet

WH Wants Billions Back From California Over Bullet Train

(AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli)

The Trump administration said they are exploring “every legal option” to get back $2.5 billion in federal funds California spent on its high-speed rail boondoggle, which Gov. Gavin Newsom announced in his first State of the State speech he is scaling back because it “would cost too much and take too long.” Additionally, the U.S. Department of Transportation said it plans to cancel $928 million in federal grants awarded to the project, which would’ve connected Los Angeles and San Francisco.  

Advertisement

Department of Transportation and Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) Administrator Ronald Batory said in his letter making the announcement that Newsom's comments were a "significant retreat from the State's initial vision and commitment and frustrates the purpose for which federal funding was awarded.”

He further said the state “materially failed to comply with the terms” of the agreement. 

The grant agreement between California and the federal government, signed in 2010, outlines several scenarios in which the federal government could take the money back. It can take the money back, for example, if the grantee fails to make "adequate progress" or "fails to complete the project or one of its tasks" or if the state doesn't meet its matching fund requirements.

If the federal government decides to take the money back, it doesn't have to wait for California to write a check. The agreement states the federal government could offset the money it would pay California for different transportation or other projects.

California hasn't yet fully matched the $2.5 billion in stimulus money. It's in the process of doing so now, using money from the 2008 bond passed by voters and revenue from the state's cap-and-trade program. It can't unlock the $929 million grant until it completes its match. (CNBC)

Advertisement

Related:

CALIFORNIA

Newsom vowed to fight to keep the money and said the move was nothing but political retribution after the state sued the administration over the president’s declaration of a national emergency to pay for the border wall. 

"This is clear political retribution by President Trump, and we won't sit idly by," Newsom said in a statement. "This is California's money, and we are going to fight for it."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement