Update: The Times has issued a correction.
New: The New York Times has updated its story on @nikkihaley: "An earlier version of this article and headline created an unfair impression about who was responsible for the purchase in question." pic.twitter.com/GQg7Bj0qfv
— Oliver Darcy (@oliverdarcy) September 14, 2018
"An earlier version of this article and headline created an unfair impression about who was responsible for the purchase in question. While Nikki R. Haley is the current ambassador to the United Nations, the decision on leasing the ambassador’s residence and purchasing the curtains was made during the Obama administration, according to current and former officials. The article should not have focused on Ms. Haley, nor should a picture of her have been used. The article and headline have now been edited to reflect those concerns, and the picture has been removed."
Original Post: Nikki Haley, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, has come under fire over expensive curtains that were installed in her official residence given the State Department’s deep budget cuts and hiring freeze. There’s just one problem—the nearly $53,000 furnishing was approved under the Obama administration in 2016.
The New York Times’s report on the curtains explains that Haley is the first ambassador to live in the nearly 6,000 square foot penthouse in Manhattan ever since the Waldorf Astoria, where her predecessors lived for decades, was purchased by a Chinese company. For security reasons, the new living situation was arranged.
It wasn’t until the sixth paragraph, however, that the Times reported that Haley had nothing to do with the purchase, which was approved under the Obama administration.
A spokesman for Ms. Haley said plans to buy the curtains were made in 2016, during the Obama administration. Ms. Haley had no say in the purchase, he said. (NYT)
Patrick Kennedy, the State Department’s top management official during the Obama administration, told the Times that the purchase was necessary for security and official entertainment reasons.
“All she’s got is a part-time maid, and the ability to open and close the curtains quickly is important,” Kennedy told the paper.
Critics slammed Haley for the purchase, despite the fact that the Trump administration was not involved in the order.
“How can you, on the one hand, tell diplomats that basic needs cannot be met and, on the other hand, spend more than $50,000 on a customized curtain system for the ambassador to the U.N.?” Brett Bruen, a White House official in the Obama administration, told the Times.
“When @nikkihaley's not busy rejecting the idea of universal human rights, she's busy spending $52,701 of US tax payer money on curtains for her residence. Milk the people, screw the world. Fine priorities you got there,” Andrew Stroehlein, Human Rights Watch’s European Media Director, said in a tweet.
Others came to Haley’s defense.
Perfect example of how journos in the Trump era decide what the story is before they gather any of the facts.
— Amber Athey (@amber_athey) September 14, 2018
The curtains were purchased during the Obama admin, you see, but Gardiner here had already decided to pin them on @nikkihaley. https://t.co/WlIKOIn47T
Weirdest hit piece on Nikki Haley -- for a decision reportedly made during the Obama administration...
— Kristina Wong?????? (@kristina_wong) September 14, 2018
"A spokesman for Ms. Haley said plans to buy the curtains were made in 2016, during the Obama administration. Ms. Haley had no say in the purchase, he said." https://t.co/uqYRsfFCAo
This seems like a pretty important paragraph that we should get to the bottom of before calling them “Nikki Haley’s $52,000 curtains” https://t.co/2RfJkFqvch pic.twitter.com/AZOJwsofwS
— Aaron Blake (@AaronBlake) September 14, 2018
Latest scummy headline at @NYTimes: https://t.co/7Flg9qMgpz (Make sure you read paragraph 6, and then re-read the headline) @nikkihaley
— Ross Kaminsky (@Rossputin) September 14, 2018
Join the conversation as a VIP Member