Israel Strikes Back
Are Iran's Nine Lives Nearing an End?
News Outlets Mad at Trump Also Defy Judge’s Gag Order on Juror Information,...
Ich Bin Ein Uri Berliner
Hold Obama-Biden Foreign Policy Responsible for Iran's Unprecedented Attack on Israel
Do Celebrities Have Deeper Liberal Thoughts?
The World Is Paying a Deadly Price for Barack Obama's Foreign Policy Legacy
Maybe Larger Families Will Produce Better Leaders, as in the Early US
The Mainstream Media: American Democracy’s Greatest Threat
Watch This Purple-Haired Democrat Demand for More Ukraine Funding In Massive Rant
MTG Introduces Strange Amendment As She Fights Ukraine Funding Package
Watch Josh Hawley Expose DHS Secretary Mayorkas Over Release of Laken Riley's Accused...
Ilhan Omar’s Daughter Arrested Amid Anti-Israel Protests
12-Person Jury Has Been Selected In Trump Trial
GOP Congressman Warns the Biden Admin to Protect Its Own Citizens, Not Illegal...
Tipsheet

Here's the Latest Issue the Trump Administration Wants the Supreme Court to Rule On

The Trump administration wants the Supreme Court to have the final say on President Trump’s decision to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.

The Justice Department late Thursday asked the court to hear its appeal of the 9th Circuit’s decision to block the administration from ending the Obama-era program.

Advertisement

DOJ attorneys argued in the 33-page appeal that waiting for the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to hear the case and issue a ruling would take months, even if the case was on an expedited review. And doing so, they said would “require the government to retain in place a discretionary policy that sanctions the ongoing violation of federal law by more than half a million people.” (The Hill)

“Even if the losing party were to seek certiorari immediately following the 9th Circuit’s decision, this court would not be able to review the decision in the ordinary course until next Term at the earliest,” the appeal reads.

The move comes a week after a federal judge in San Francisco ruled that DACA must remain in place and individuals in the program must be allowed to renew their applications. 

DOJ argued that former acting Secretary Elaine Duke’s September decision to rescind the DACA program was a “policy enforcement” decision that’s within the powers of a federal agency and can’t be reviewed under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).  

“Even if DHS’s prospective denial of deferred action were reviewable, the individual respondents could not obtain such review unless and until a final order of removal were entered against them,” they wrote.

“And even if it were reviewable now under the APA, the decision to rescind the DACA policy was not arbitrary and capricious. The Acting Secretary opted to wind down DACA after reasonably concluding that the policy was likely to be struck down by courts and indeed was unlawful.”

Advertisement

In a statement earlier this week, California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, who led the DACA lawsuit against the Trump administration, said he believes the injunction will be upheld. 


“I am confident the appellate courts will see the logic and justice behind the district court’s issuance of the preliminary injunction against the termination of the DACA program,” he said. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement