Of Course, NPR Jumped on This Story About the LA Wildfires
CNN's Scott Jennings Nailed the Real Objective Behind the Latest Anti-Trump Ruling
A Hispanic Woman Just Took Dems to the Cleaners for Slobbering Over Abrego...
What Is Democratic Legality?
Problematic Powell: What to Do With the Worst Fed Chair in History
The Pete Hegseth Red Herring and the GOP's Foreign Policy Civil War
Liberals Loathe Arrival of 'MAGA Media' Inside the White House
IKEA and Demographics
Regardless, Good
Should Due Process Stop Trump From Deporting Illegals?
State Department ‘Target-Rich’ for Cuts, WH Deputy Press Secretary Says
For Real?! Tim Walz Is Still Going After Elon Musk, Donald Trump
While Congressional Democrats Were in El Salvador, Bernie Moreno Went to Israel
Judge Rules Against Trump Administration Withholding Funds Over DEI
With Durbin Not Running for Reelection, Is This Top Democrat Next to Retire?
Tipsheet

Federal Judge Prevents Texas From Cracking Down on Sanctuary Cities

A federal judge temporarily blocked most of Texas’s new “sanctuary cities” law that allows police to ask about an individual’s immigration status during routing interactions with the public.

Advertisement

The ruling by U.S. District Judge Orlando Garcia will halt the law from going into effect Sept. 1 allowing a suit against it to go forward.

U.S. District Judge Orlando Garcia blocked portions of Senate Bill 4 (SB 4) requiring local law enforcement departments to comply with federal requests to hold unauthorized immigrants in custody. Also blocked: a provision that stopped local departments from implementing policies that would “materially limit” enforcement of immigration laws, the Dallas News reported.

An aspect of the law permitting police officers to ask about immigration status was not blocked, but the ruling did limit the actions officers would be allowed to take after learning that a person was undocumented – officers could only report the person’s immigration status to federal authorities. (Fox News)

"In sum, SB 4 gives local officers discretion to inquire and share information but it does not provide them with discretion to act upon the information that they may obtain," Garcia wrote in his decision.

He also said in his 94-page ruling that the law would ultimately make the state less safe.

There "is overwhelming evidence by local officials, including local law enforcement, that SB 4 will erode public trust and make many communities and neighborhoods less safe" he argued, and that "localities will suffer adverse economic consequences which, in turn, will harm the state of Texas."

Advertisement

"The Court cannot and does not second guess the Legislature," he continued. "However, the state may not exercise its authority in a manner that violates the United States Constitution."

Democrats praised the ruling.

“This ruling is good for Austin because SB 4 if ever implemented would make Austin less safe,” Mayor Steve Adler said in a news release. “This week’s crisis with Hurricane Harvey is just the most recent example why people need to feel safe approaching our local police and support groups, no matter what. If people in Austin do not feel safe asking for help, they become more vulnerable to crime, not just natural disasters.”

While the left was quick to celebrate the judge’s decision, the legal fight on SB4 is far from over, with Texas already vowing to appeal the ruling. 

“U.S. Supreme Court precedent for laws similar to Texas’ law are firmly on our side,” Gov. Greg Abbott said in a statement. “This decision will be appealed immediately and I am confident Texas’ law will be found constitutional and ultimately be upheld.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement