Bill Maher Had the Perfect Response to ‘Seinfeld’ Creator’s Op-Ed Regarding His Dinner...
Is the Latest Liberal Media Psyop on Abrego Garcia Collapsing?
Since the Media Is Wondering Why Everyone Hates Them, Let's Dissect This Headline...
Is This the Most NPR Story Ever?
CNN's Scott Jennings Nails What's Motivating These Anti-Trump Rulings
This Judge Thought He Was Above the Law — ICE Had Other Ideas
Another Top Pentagon Official Resigns Amid Internal 'Turf War'
What Is Democratic Legality?
Problematic Powell: What to Do With the Worst Fed Chair in History
The Pete Hegseth Red Herring and the GOP's Foreign Policy Civil War
Burgum Takes Jocelyn Nungaray's Family to a Very Special Place
IKEA and Demographics
A Closer Look at Trump's Meeting With Norway's Prime Minister
Regardless, Good
Should Due Process Stop Trump From Deporting Illegals?
Tipsheet

Holder Praises Edward Snowden: He Performed a 'Public Service'

Former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder on Monday said Edward Snowden, the NSA contractor who stole up to 1.7 million classified documents and released hundreds of thousands of them to journalists, performed a “public service” by igniting a debate in the country about domestic surveillance programs.

Advertisement

"We can certainly argue about the way in which Snowden did what he did, but I think that he actually performed a public service by raising the debate we engaged in and by the changes that we made," Holder said during an interview with CNN political commentator and former senior adviser to Obama, David Axelrod.

Nonetheless, Holder did follow up by saying that what Snowden did was wrong.

"Now, I would say doing what he did in the way he did it was inappropriate and illegal," he said. "He's broken the law. In my view, he needs to get lawyers, come on back and decide what he wants to do — go to trial, try to cut a deal."

Snowden has repeatedly said he would be willing to return to the United States if the federal government would provide him a fair trial. However, Snowden says he is concerned that under federal espionage laws he would not allow him to present a whistleblower defense, arguing in court he acted in the public interest.

"But in deciding what an appropriate sentence should be, a judge could take into account the usefulness of having that national debate," Holder added.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement