President Trump Reveals What We All Suspected About the 2020 Election in Primetime...
Peggy Flanagan Wants to Make Kids Whole. She Can Start With Kids Harmed...
Mashed Out: Katie Porter Says She's Done With Politics Following Failed Gubernatorial Camp...
Possible Maine Senate Candidate Troy Jackson Just Called to 'Get Rid' of People...
There Is a Case of the DNC Hiding Its Financials and the Press...
Rep. Summer Lee Admits She Wants More Black Doctors, Even If They're Unqualified
Democrats May Love Socialism, but They Can't Get Enough Luxury on the Campaign...
Why We Need the SAVE America Act
Trump Declassifies Election Documents: Here's What We Know So Far
Two Seattle-Area Men Sentenced for Trafficking Drugs Near Homeless Encampments
Former TD Bank Employee Sentenced to 46 Months for $474 Million Money Laundering...
'Complete Fraud': NRCC Blasts NY Dem Josh Riley Over NRDC Donations
Massachusetts Man Sentenced for Collecting Dead Beneficiary's Social Security Checks for Y...
Former Federal Reserve Adviser Sentenced to 38 Months for Lying About Ties to...
Brandon Gill Introduces Legislation Requiring Naturalized Citizens Speak English
Tipsheet

Facebook Board Member: Free Speech is 'Not an Absolute Human Right’

Facebook Board Member: Free Speech is 'Not an Absolute Human Right’
AP Photo/Ben Margot, File

A Facebook Oversight Board member said that free speech is not “an absolute” right and should be weighed against “other human rights” when determining if content should be censored by the tech giant.

Advertisement

Board member Helle Thorning Schmidt, who is also a former Danish Prime Minister, said Thursday that “free speech is not an absolute human right.”

“It has to be balanced with other human rights,” she said.

The Facebook Oversight Board, which consists of 20 members from around the world, was created last year to help corporate executives to distance themselves from decisions considered to be politically.

The board previously recommended that Facebook continue its ban placed the account of former President Donald Trump, which was initially imposed following the Capitol riot on Jan. 6.

Although US courts have found the right to free speech isn’t absolute, the US has strong legal and cultural support for the free distribution of information. Other countries have starkly different standards, some even mandating digital censorship.

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution bars the government from “abridging the freedom of speech.” However, private companies are not bound by that provision. 

Advertisement

Facebook and other tech companies are also protected by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which guarantees they will not be held liable for users' posts while allowing them to restrict content deemed "obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable."

Last week, Trump filed a lawsuit against Facebook, alleging that it censored content at the direction of government officials within the Democratic Party. Because of this, he argues that the First Amendment should apply to the social media platform's content moderating because the company would then be a "government actor."

White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Thursday at a press briefing that the Biden administration has been “flagging problematic posts for Facebook that spread disinformation” about the coronavirus and vaccines.

While American citizens have a right to free speech, there are limitations that allow the government to restriction and criminalize “fighting words” that would likely evoke violence and lawlessness.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement