Who Was Cesar Chavez — and Who Will He Become?
Washington Post 'Proves' Republicans Struggle With Bigotry With...Anti-Trump Figure Promot...
Everytown for Gun Safety Celebrates WA's 'Ghost Gun' Bill. Here's What They Get...
Marco Rubio: Trump Taking Decisive Action Against Iran Protects Americans and the World
ICE Agent Saves Choking 1-Year-Old at JFK as Democrats Fearmonger About ICE in...
Don Lemon Gets A Slap in the Face as a Persian Man Rejects...
US Oil and Gas Association Calls Out Sen. Mark Kelly As He Complains...
Steve Witkoff Gives Updates on Iran Peace Talks, and Issues a Stern Warning
Alleged Brooklyn Gang Member Sentenced to 12 Years for $800K COVID Fraud Scheme
DOJ Revokes Citizenship of Two, Targets Third in Immigration Fraud Crackdown
Chinese National Faces Prison, Then Deportation After $95,000 Elder Fraud Conspiracy
Trump to Sign Order Ensuring Immediate Pay for TSA Agents Amid Airport Chaos,...
Armed Massachusetts Man Pleads Guilty to Attempted Assassination of Trump's Cabinet Member...
California Woman Ordered to Repay $14M Over Medicare Scam
Fraud Ring Allegedly Used Fake IDs to Steal Nearly $1M From Public Assistance...
Tipsheet

Facebook Board Member: Free Speech is 'Not an Absolute Human Right’

Facebook Board Member: Free Speech is 'Not an Absolute Human Right’
AP Photo/Ben Margot, File

A Facebook Oversight Board member said that free speech is not “an absolute” right and should be weighed against “other human rights” when determining if content should be censored by the tech giant.

Advertisement

Board member Helle Thorning Schmidt, who is also a former Danish Prime Minister, said Thursday that “free speech is not an absolute human right.”

“It has to be balanced with other human rights,” she said.

The Facebook Oversight Board, which consists of 20 members from around the world, was created last year to help corporate executives to distance themselves from decisions considered to be politically.

The board previously recommended that Facebook continue its ban placed the account of former President Donald Trump, which was initially imposed following the Capitol riot on Jan. 6.

Although US courts have found the right to free speech isn’t absolute, the US has strong legal and cultural support for the free distribution of information. Other countries have starkly different standards, some even mandating digital censorship.

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution bars the government from “abridging the freedom of speech.” However, private companies are not bound by that provision. 

Advertisement

Facebook and other tech companies are also protected by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which guarantees they will not be held liable for users' posts while allowing them to restrict content deemed "obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable."

Last week, Trump filed a lawsuit against Facebook, alleging that it censored content at the direction of government officials within the Democratic Party. Because of this, he argues that the First Amendment should apply to the social media platform's content moderating because the company would then be a "government actor."

White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Thursday at a press briefing that the Biden administration has been “flagging problematic posts for Facebook that spread disinformation” about the coronavirus and vaccines.

While American citizens have a right to free speech, there are limitations that allow the government to restriction and criminalize “fighting words” that would likely evoke violence and lawlessness.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement