Naval Lawyer Delivers a Kill Shot to the Left's Uproar Over Trump's Airstrikes...
Can You Guess Which Commentator These Hollywood Actors Are Mad at Regarding How...
Jewish Parents Furious at School Over Muslim Club's Pro-Hamas Display
Trump Was Right to Slam the Brakes on Fuel-Efficiency Standards
Damning Watchdog Report Reveals 'Large-Scale Systemic Failures' Leading to Obamacare Subsi...
Tech Billionaire Drops $6.25 Billion Donation to Jump-Start Trump Accounts for 25 Million...
Time for a Midterm Contract With America
Democrats Fuel Racial Strife to Get Votes
Illegal Alien, Son Arrested for Allegedly Trafficking 75 Firearms
Man Who Set Fire To Train With Victim Inside Face 40 Years in...
Former High-Level DEA Official Charged With Narcoterrorism in Alleged Plot to Aid CJNG...
Florida Man Convicted of Attempted Murder of Two Federal Officers in ATF Raid
DOJ Settlement Forces Constellation to Sell Six Power Plants in $26.6B Calpine Merger
Trump’s Not the First to Invoke Old Laws
Panic-Stricken Climate Alarmists Resort to Bolder Lies
Tipsheet

Facebook Board Member: Free Speech is 'Not an Absolute Human Right’

AP Photo/Ben Margot, File

A Facebook Oversight Board member said that free speech is not “an absolute” right and should be weighed against “other human rights” when determining if content should be censored by the tech giant.

Advertisement

Board member Helle Thorning Schmidt, who is also a former Danish Prime Minister, said Thursday that “free speech is not an absolute human right.”

“It has to be balanced with other human rights,” she said.

The Facebook Oversight Board, which consists of 20 members from around the world, was created last year to help corporate executives to distance themselves from decisions considered to be politically.

The board previously recommended that Facebook continue its ban placed the account of former President Donald Trump, which was initially imposed following the Capitol riot on Jan. 6.

Although US courts have found the right to free speech isn’t absolute, the US has strong legal and cultural support for the free distribution of information. Other countries have starkly different standards, some even mandating digital censorship.

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution bars the government from “abridging the freedom of speech.” However, private companies are not bound by that provision. 

Advertisement

Facebook and other tech companies are also protected by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which guarantees they will not be held liable for users' posts while allowing them to restrict content deemed "obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable."

Last week, Trump filed a lawsuit against Facebook, alleging that it censored content at the direction of government officials within the Democratic Party. Because of this, he argues that the First Amendment should apply to the social media platform's content moderating because the company would then be a "government actor."

White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Thursday at a press briefing that the Biden administration has been “flagging problematic posts for Facebook that spread disinformation” about the coronavirus and vaccines.

While American citizens have a right to free speech, there are limitations that allow the government to restriction and criminalize “fighting words” that would likely evoke violence and lawlessness.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos