Inoculate Yourself Against Manipulation
VICE Posted a List on How White People Can Behave Better...and It's Unintentionally...
Smearing Capitalism
Deadspin Writer Targets a Child, CNN's Anti-Elon Crusade Stelter's Fox Book Tanks in...
Team Biden's Double Quarter Pounder 'Misinformation' Campaign
Worrying About Joe Biden Getting 'Credit' on PBS
New York's Crisis Is a Lesson For Cities Everywhere
Laws Requiring Permission to Obtain Guns Look Vulnerable
Senator Cassidy and Graham’s CO2 Emissions Tax Will Be Expensive and Cause More...
Everything Is Political, Even Your Life Insurance
Widening Revolt Against Globalism
It Took UN Women This Long to Call Out Hamas for October 7...
When Congress Finally Passes Aid for Israel, Will It Come With Conditions?
Even After What We Know About Hostages, There's Still Been Some Terrible Takes...
It Looks Like Rep. George Santos Could Soon Be Expelled From Congress

Facebook Board Member: Free Speech is 'Not an Absolute Human Right’

AP Photo/Ben Margot, File

A Facebook Oversight Board member said that free speech is not “an absolute” right and should be weighed against “other human rights” when determining if content should be censored by the tech giant.


Board member Helle Thorning Schmidt, who is also a former Danish Prime Minister, said Thursday that “free speech is not an absolute human right.”

“It has to be balanced with other human rights,” she said.

The Facebook Oversight Board, which consists of 20 members from around the world, was created last year to help corporate executives to distance themselves from decisions considered to be politically.

The board previously recommended that Facebook continue its ban placed the account of former President Donald Trump, which was initially imposed following the Capitol riot on Jan. 6.

Although US courts have found the right to free speech isn’t absolute, the US has strong legal and cultural support for the free distribution of information. Other countries have starkly different standards, some even mandating digital censorship.

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution bars the government from “abridging the freedom of speech.” However, private companies are not bound by that provision. 


Facebook and other tech companies are also protected by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which guarantees they will not be held liable for users' posts while allowing them to restrict content deemed "obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable."

Last week, Trump filed a lawsuit against Facebook, alleging that it censored content at the direction of government officials within the Democratic Party. Because of this, he argues that the First Amendment should apply to the social media platform's content moderating because the company would then be a "government actor."

White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Thursday at a press briefing that the Biden administration has been “flagging problematic posts for Facebook that spread disinformation” about the coronavirus and vaccines.

While American citizens have a right to free speech, there are limitations that allow the government to restriction and criminalize “fighting words” that would likely evoke violence and lawlessness.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos