Did Marjorie Taylor Greene Tip Off Leftists About Where Trump Was Eating...
The Washington Post's Pushed a Massive LIE About the ICE Shooting in Minneapolis
Did the Face of Somali Daycare Fraud in Minnesota Shut Down?
Hilton Hotel Worker in Texas Who Warned About ICE Presence on Social Media...
The Corporation for Public Broadcasting Is No More
Israeli Military Intelligence Gave a Shocking Update on the Iran Protests
America vs. F**K YOU!
You'll Never Guess Who This CNN Host Thinks the 'Actual Victims' of the...
Indiana Credit Union CEO Sentenced to Federal Prison in $285K Bank Fraud Scheme
Why Did Democrat Senator Ruben Gallego Just Lie About This ICE Officer?
Illegal Immigrant Used Stolen Identity to Vote in Multiple U.S. Elections, Feds Say
Detroit Teen Faces up to $5M Fine, 40 Years in Prison After Guilty...
The Portland Police Chief Is Shedding Tears for Venezuelan Gang Members Shot by...
A Judge Is Blocking Trump From Stopping Payments to Daycare Fraudsters
WHOOPS: Leftists Stage Massive Anti-ICE Protest Outside of the Wrong Hotel
Tipsheet

Facebook Board Member: Free Speech is 'Not an Absolute Human Right’

AP Photo/Ben Margot, File

A Facebook Oversight Board member said that free speech is not “an absolute” right and should be weighed against “other human rights” when determining if content should be censored by the tech giant.

Advertisement

Board member Helle Thorning Schmidt, who is also a former Danish Prime Minister, said Thursday that “free speech is not an absolute human right.”

“It has to be balanced with other human rights,” she said.

The Facebook Oversight Board, which consists of 20 members from around the world, was created last year to help corporate executives to distance themselves from decisions considered to be politically.

The board previously recommended that Facebook continue its ban placed the account of former President Donald Trump, which was initially imposed following the Capitol riot on Jan. 6.

Although US courts have found the right to free speech isn’t absolute, the US has strong legal and cultural support for the free distribution of information. Other countries have starkly different standards, some even mandating digital censorship.

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution bars the government from “abridging the freedom of speech.” However, private companies are not bound by that provision. 

Advertisement

Facebook and other tech companies are also protected by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which guarantees they will not be held liable for users' posts while allowing them to restrict content deemed "obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable."

Last week, Trump filed a lawsuit against Facebook, alleging that it censored content at the direction of government officials within the Democratic Party. Because of this, he argues that the First Amendment should apply to the social media platform's content moderating because the company would then be a "government actor."

White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Thursday at a press briefing that the Biden administration has been “flagging problematic posts for Facebook that spread disinformation” about the coronavirus and vaccines.

While American citizens have a right to free speech, there are limitations that allow the government to restriction and criminalize “fighting words” that would likely evoke violence and lawlessness.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement