The New York Times Might Regret Publishing That Column on Sexual Abuse in...
The Four Horsemen of the New Antisemitism
Former Staffer Says Congressman Made Her 'Uncomfortable' in Text Message Exchange
Here's Why a Disabled Woman Is Suing the City of Portland
Gavin Newsom's 'Press Office' Responds to Inmate Tablet Scandal
Mike Johnson Warns That 'Little Mamdanis' Want to Build a Socialist Utopia in...
'Unprecedented Threat:' Routine Maintenance Found an IED at an Alabama Dam
The Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty Just Sued the State Over Its...
Karen Bass Has Another Welfare Scheme That's a Kick in the Teeth for...
Gavin Newsom's About to Announce His Final California Budget Proposal, and It's Going...
How Did Memorial Drive Shooter Got Gun in Heavily Regulated Massachusetts?
Here's Why Marco Rubio Has Long Been a Proponent of NATO and Why...
Democrats Are on the Wrong Side of History With AI: Fetterman Rips Into...
Gavin Newsom Spent $189 Million for CA Prisoners to Watch Adult Content and...
Karen Bass Can’t Handle Spencer Pratt’s Brutal AI Campaign Ads
Tipsheet

McConnell Says It Is 'Highly Unlikely' He Would Let Biden Fill Supreme Court Vacancy in 2024

McConnell Says It Is 'Highly Unlikely' He Would Let Biden Fill Supreme Court Vacancy in 2024
AP Photo/Patrick Semansky

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY.) said Monday that if the Republican Party regains control of the Senate in 2022, it is "highly unlikely" that he would allow President Joe Biden to confirm a Supreme Court vacancy if one were to open up in 2024.

Advertisement

McConnell said on the Hugh Hewitt radio program, according to CNN, that a Senate controlled by one party would not confirm a Supreme Court justice nomination by a president of the opposing party.

I think in the middle of a presidential election, if you have a Senate of the opposite party of the president, you have to go back to the 1880s to find the last time a vacancy was filled. So I think it's highly unlikely. In fact, no, I don't think either party if it controlled, if it were different from the president, would confirm a Supreme Court nominee in the middle of an election. What was different in 2020 was we were of the same party as the president.

McConnell was criticized by Democrats in 2020 when Republicans confirmed Amy Coney Barrett, former President Trump's Supreme Court nominee, ahead of the presidential election. 

This comes as progressives seek to pressure Justice Stephen Breyer into retirement to ensure Biden nominates a replacement to the high court. Democratic Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rep. Mondaire Jones of New York both signaled that they were in favor of Breyer stepping down so a liberal justice could take his place, avoiding a repeat of 2020 when Trump nominated Barrett to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg following her death. 

Advertisement

Ocasio-Cortez told CNN's Dana Bash on "State of the Union" Sunday that she "would probably lean towards yes," when asked if she thinks Breyer should retire at the end of this Supreme Court term.

In April, Jones said that "there’s no question" that Breyer should retire. 

My goodness, have we not learned our lesson?

McConnell and Senate Republicans did not consider former President Barack Obama's Supreme Court nomination of Merrick Garland in 2016, following the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, because it was an election year.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement