Oh, Lord, What Is Kamala Harris Announcing Today?
Donald Trump's Plan for Elections Will Set Democrats' Hair on Fire
Trump Administration Is Investigating This Company for Discriminating Against White Employ...
Journalist David Hoch Testified Before Congress About Minnesota Fraud. Here's What He Said...
What's the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Hiding?
Spanberger Ends Virginia State Police Agreement to Cooperate With ICE
Federal Agents Conducted a Pre-Dawn Immigration Raid in Minneapolis
Black(listing) ICE
Report: Iran Has Seized Two Foreign Oil Tankers in the Persian Gulf
Oh, Now Tim Walz Cares About Keeping Track of Kids
This VA Trans Sex Offender Was Just Found Guilty by an Arlington Jury
This Australian Boy Went to Heroic Lengths to Save His Family
Speaker Johnson to Pope Leo: Do Better
Lone Republican Steve Hilton Emerges As the Surprise Winner of the California Governor...
Border Czar Tom Homan Slams the Left for Using Children in Anti-ICE Political...
Tipsheet

Hillary Clinton's Private Email: Possibly a Security Breach

While at the State Department, former U.S. senator and possible 2016 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton did not use a government email address, corresponding almost entirely via a personal email account - a blatant violation of government rules and possibly a dangerous security breach.

Advertisement

As the New York times reports:

Her expansive use of the private account was alarming to current and former National Archives and Records Administration officials and government watchdogs, who called it a serious breach.

“It is very difficult to conceive of a scenario — short of nuclear winter — where an agency would be justified in allowing its cabinet-level-head officer to solely use a private email communications channel for the conduct of government business,” said Jason R. Baron, a lawyer at Drinker Biddle and Reath who is a former director of litigation at the National Archives and Records Administration.

Under federal law, however, letters and emails written and received by federal officials, such as the secretary of state, are considered government records and are supposed to be retained so that congressional committees, historians and members of the news media can find them. There are exceptions to the law for certain classified and sensitive materials.

This would be a major breach of protocol and a good way to put government information in dangerous hands - how secure are emails available to the general public, after all? - but it was a long time ago. Clinton left the State Department two whole years ago. What difference, at this point, does it make?

Advertisement

As the New York Times documents further:

Regulations from the National Archives and Records Administration at the time required that any emails sent or received from personal accounts be preserved as part of the agency’s records.

But Mrs. Clinton and her aides failed to do so.

Mr. Blanton said high-level officials should operate as President Obama does, emailing from a secure government account, with every record preserved for historical purposes.

“Personal emails are not secure,” he said. “Senior officials should not be using them.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement