I Bet Sports Partnering With Prediction Markets Will Be a Disaster
Cold Zero: A Thriller That Hits Where Fiction Collides With Geopolitics
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 312: 'The Glory of These Forty Days'
Goodness Exists, Though You’d Never Know It From the Corporate Media
So What's the Score?
Brother Love the Earth’s Traveling Salvation Show
What Tim Pool Says on God’s Omnipotence and the Laws of Logic
Truth on Trial
Antisemitism, Canaries in Coal Mines, Conspiracy Theories, and Kool-Aid
Reclaiming Biblical Femininity Amid Cultural Assault
Lessons to Learn From the Titanic
BlackRock Sets New Standard for Progress in Shareholder Responsiveness on Charitable Gift-...
Biden Administration Push to Weaken Credit Standards Resuscitated by Bureaucrats
The Death Spiral to America Reimagined
Nick Shirley Hires Private Security Because Leftists Doxx Him
Tipsheet

Hillary Clinton's Private Email: Possibly a Security Breach

Hillary Clinton's Private Email: Possibly a Security Breach

While at the State Department, former U.S. senator and possible 2016 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton did not use a government email address, corresponding almost entirely via a personal email account - a blatant violation of government rules and possibly a dangerous security breach.

Advertisement

As the New York times reports:

Her expansive use of the private account was alarming to current and former National Archives and Records Administration officials and government watchdogs, who called it a serious breach.

“It is very difficult to conceive of a scenario — short of nuclear winter — where an agency would be justified in allowing its cabinet-level-head officer to solely use a private email communications channel for the conduct of government business,” said Jason R. Baron, a lawyer at Drinker Biddle and Reath who is a former director of litigation at the National Archives and Records Administration.

Under federal law, however, letters and emails written and received by federal officials, such as the secretary of state, are considered government records and are supposed to be retained so that congressional committees, historians and members of the news media can find them. There are exceptions to the law for certain classified and sensitive materials.

This would be a major breach of protocol and a good way to put government information in dangerous hands - how secure are emails available to the general public, after all? - but it was a long time ago. Clinton left the State Department two whole years ago. What difference, at this point, does it make?

Advertisement

As the New York Times documents further:

Regulations from the National Archives and Records Administration at the time required that any emails sent or received from personal accounts be preserved as part of the agency’s records.

But Mrs. Clinton and her aides failed to do so.

Mr. Blanton said high-level officials should operate as President Obama does, emailing from a secure government account, with every record preserved for historical purposes.

“Personal emails are not secure,” he said. “Senior officials should not be using them.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement