June's Inflation Relief Was a Peace Dividend
Mamdani Is Fundamentally Reimagining Violence
Why the Left Hates Jews and Christians
The Lure of Cheating the Government Without Penalty
Further Proof That Climate Cataclysms Are Just Fearmongering
Private Equity Didn't Kill the Patient
Brightline Is a Boondoggle—Secretary Duffy Must Not Give It Another Bailout
When Friends Stand Together
Indian Americans Are Proud to Be Part of America’s 250-Year Story
Democrats Search for Graham Platner’s Runner-Up
Taxing the Wealthy Can’t Fund Social Security Into Solvency
California Makes Everyone Else Pay for Its Climate Goals With $2.2 Billion Port...
Gang Member's Instagram Cash Flexes Unravel $2.8M Fraud Ring
Third Circuit Spikes New Jersey Ban on 'Assault Firearms' and Large Capacity Magazines
Everything Went Wrong for James Talarico This Week After His Epstein-Tied Backer Was...
Tipsheet

Hillary Clinton's Private Email: Possibly a Security Breach

Hillary Clinton's Private Email: Possibly a Security Breach

While at the State Department, former U.S. senator and possible 2016 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton did not use a government email address, corresponding almost entirely via a personal email account - a blatant violation of government rules and possibly a dangerous security breach.

Advertisement

As the New York times reports:

Her expansive use of the private account was alarming to current and former National Archives and Records Administration officials and government watchdogs, who called it a serious breach.

“It is very difficult to conceive of a scenario — short of nuclear winter — where an agency would be justified in allowing its cabinet-level-head officer to solely use a private email communications channel for the conduct of government business,” said Jason R. Baron, a lawyer at Drinker Biddle and Reath who is a former director of litigation at the National Archives and Records Administration.

Under federal law, however, letters and emails written and received by federal officials, such as the secretary of state, are considered government records and are supposed to be retained so that congressional committees, historians and members of the news media can find them. There are exceptions to the law for certain classified and sensitive materials.

This would be a major breach of protocol and a good way to put government information in dangerous hands - how secure are emails available to the general public, after all? - but it was a long time ago. Clinton left the State Department two whole years ago. What difference, at this point, does it make?

Advertisement

As the New York Times documents further:

Regulations from the National Archives and Records Administration at the time required that any emails sent or received from personal accounts be preserved as part of the agency’s records.

But Mrs. Clinton and her aides failed to do so.

Mr. Blanton said high-level officials should operate as President Obama does, emailing from a secure government account, with every record preserved for historical purposes.

“Personal emails are not secure,” he said. “Senior officials should not be using them.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement