An Ex-Sanders Aide Noticed Something Odd About Graham Platner's MS Now Interview
If Graham Platner's Campaign Implodes, Don't Come Begging to This Maine Dem to...
Even Liberal Reporters Are Highlighting This Aspect of the Damning NYT Story on...
So, the Menu for Those on Hunger Strike at Delaney Hall Is Quite...
Hakeem Jeffries Does Not Want to Talk About Florida's Democrat Civil War
Tom Tiffany Vows to Streamline Wisconsin's Road Construction Projects
Francesca Hong Will Turn Wisconsin Into a Sanctuary State
Senate Passes $70 Billion Immigration Enforcement Package
Lithuanian Ambassador Varvuolis Reflects on First Year in Washington
Our Billionaires Kind of Stink
When Cowardly Journalists Abuse Anonymous Sourcing
Randi Weingarten Is the Real Threat to Public Education
Trust Fund Commies
Election Day Does Not Wait for Litigation
Free Speech Comes With Responsibility
Tipsheet

Hillary Clinton's Private Email: Possibly a Security Breach

Hillary Clinton's Private Email: Possibly a Security Breach

While at the State Department, former U.S. senator and possible 2016 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton did not use a government email address, corresponding almost entirely via a personal email account - a blatant violation of government rules and possibly a dangerous security breach.

Advertisement

As the New York times reports:

Her expansive use of the private account was alarming to current and former National Archives and Records Administration officials and government watchdogs, who called it a serious breach.

“It is very difficult to conceive of a scenario — short of nuclear winter — where an agency would be justified in allowing its cabinet-level-head officer to solely use a private email communications channel for the conduct of government business,” said Jason R. Baron, a lawyer at Drinker Biddle and Reath who is a former director of litigation at the National Archives and Records Administration.

Under federal law, however, letters and emails written and received by federal officials, such as the secretary of state, are considered government records and are supposed to be retained so that congressional committees, historians and members of the news media can find them. There are exceptions to the law for certain classified and sensitive materials.

This would be a major breach of protocol and a good way to put government information in dangerous hands - how secure are emails available to the general public, after all? - but it was a long time ago. Clinton left the State Department two whole years ago. What difference, at this point, does it make?

Advertisement

As the New York Times documents further:

Regulations from the National Archives and Records Administration at the time required that any emails sent or received from personal accounts be preserved as part of the agency’s records.

But Mrs. Clinton and her aides failed to do so.

Mr. Blanton said high-level officials should operate as President Obama does, emailing from a secure government account, with every record preserved for historical purposes.

“Personal emails are not secure,” he said. “Senior officials should not be using them.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement