Why Graham Platner's Top Adviser Has His Colleagues Cringing Right Now
Is This Why It's Taking California So Long to Count Its Ballots?
Here's What a Dem Rep Said About Graham Platner. Is the Dam Breaking?
Bill Maher Beat This Dem Senator's Talking Points About CBS News and Trump...
ESPN Reporter Had the Perfect Description for the New York Knicks Right Now
The Curse of Being a Historian
Let’s All Support AOC's Run for President
Why Are Democrats Siccing Staffers on People Asking Questions?
The Amendment That Corrected the Founders
The Medicare Turf War That’s Breaking Hearts
Republicans Can Survive the Midterms If We Do This One Thing to Cut...
Persons Are Not Material for Invasive Content Creators: The Case for Anti-Surveillance Tec...
Europe Tries to Rob American Tech Again
Iranian Man Admits Smuggling Military Sonar Components to Iran Through China
Susie Wiles, WH Smack Down Fake News Report From the Daily Mail
Tipsheet

Low Deficits Don't Prove That More Spending Is Needed

 Low Deficits Don't Prove That More Spending Is Needed

Over the last few years, the Republican Congress and Barack Obama have done a decent job of bringing down the immense deficits created by the recession and the President Obama's own response to it. The federal deficit is now "only" $468 billion dollars for 2015. The deficit will continue to fall, mostly because of increased taxes, until 2017 - at which point it will start to grow larger, forever.

Advertisement

As Veronique de Rugy writes at the Mercatus Center:

The CBO projects the deficit to begin rising again in fiscal year 2017 and to surpass $1 trillion in fiscal year 2025. This growth in future deficits is the result of a jump in entitlement spending rather than a one-time increase in spending (as it was in fiscal years 2008 and 2009). Deficits will keep growing unless the underlying causes are addressed.

If current laws stay in place, spending for Social Security and the major health-care programs, including Medicare, Medicaid, and the Affordable Care Act, will grow faster than the economy. As a rule of thumb, a government’s spending should never grow faster than the economy that’s supposed to pay for it. (It’s worth noting that the CBO lowered its projection of economic growth going forward.) All of this suggests that, rather than celebrating a short-term respite from $1 trillion deficits, we should be even more concerned about reining in the size and scope of the federal government.

Advertisement

De Rugy is absolutely correct. They've produced this chart to illustrate the problem facing us:

I've written about how we tamed the medium-term deficit before, and how that doesn't matter for the future - and why we should be terrified of the entitlement programs we have currently in place.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement