Men Are Going to Strike Back
Wait, That's Why Dems Are Scared About ICE Agents Wearing Body Cams
Bill Maher Had the Perfect Response to Billie Eilish's 'Stolen Land' Nonsense
Some Guy Wanted to Test Something at an Anti-ICE Rally. Their Reaction Says...
The Trump Team Quoted the Perfect TV Show to Defend a Proposed WH...
Why This Former CNN Reporter Saying He'd Fire Scott Jennings Is Amusing
Democrats Have Earned All the Bad Things
Bakari Sellers Says America Needs a 'Fumigation' of MAGA
Don Lemon Plays Civil Rights Martyr After Cities Church Mob Arrest
Canadian PM Carney Just Announced a Plan to Make Canadian Inflation Worse
CA Governor Election 2026: Bianco or Hilton
Same Old, Same Old
The Real Purveyors of Jim Crow
The Deep State’s Inversion Matrix Must Be Seen to Be Defeated
Situational Science and Trans Medicine
Tipsheet

Student Loan Interest Rates Set to Rise - As They Should

On July 1, interest rates on federally-subsidized Stafford student loans are set to double from 3.4% to 6.8%. Both Republicans and Democrats are set to try to cut a deal to keep interest rates low for college graduates at a cost of $6 billion per year.
Advertisement

First, a little bit of background: in 2007, Democrats and President Bush signed what was meant to be a temporary cut in Stafford loan interest rates. Like so many government programs, what was once temporary now threatens to become permanent - and the government has increasingly taken over more and more of the student loan market in the process.

While the Obama administration (and, therefore, media outlets) are estimating individual savings per borrower of $1000 a year, independent outlets are pegging the savings at much, much lower levels. As Dan Doherty and I write in the newest issue of Townhall Magazine:

President Obama’s own 2013 budget pegs the average Stafford loan at $3400 over a 10 year repayment period. This translates, roughly, into $524 over the life of a loan, or only about half of what the administration is peddling.

The advocacy group U.S. PIRG, for example, estimates failing to extend the lower rate would cost the average borrower $2,800 in additional fees over a 10-year repayment period. Frederick Hess, Director of Education Policy Studies at the American Enterprise Institute, estimated the difference to be "about $25 per month." Former Congressional Budget Office (CBO) director Douglas Holtz-Eakin went further than that, arguing in National Review Online that the difference would only amount to $7 per month.

Advertisement

If the Republicans had any sense, they'd hold fast and allow the interest rates to rise. This is billions of dollars per year for a program that subsidizes college graduates, and one that has only a tenuous connection at best to sending more people to college in the first place.

As Justin Wolfers writes, "this is the worst macro policy Ive ever heard of... much of it would go into the bank." College graduates, as a class of people, are doing a lot better than those without college degrees. Their unemployment rate is lower (though at the highest ever) and they're making a lot more money. This is nothing but an election-year pander by both Republicans and Democrats to those influential college graduates who think that politicians want to "do something" to alleviate their pain.

Check out this month's issue of Townhall Magazine for our full piece on the student loans debacle.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement