'This Is Where the Systematic Killing Took Place': 200 Days of War From...
White House Insists Biden Has Been 'Very Clear' About His Position on Pro-Hamas...
Watch Biden Lose the Battle With His Teleprompter Again
Thanks, Biden! Here's How Iran Is Still Making Billions to Fund Terrorism
Texas Doesn't Take Passive Approach to Anti-Israel Mobs
Columbia Prof Who Called to Defund the Police, Now Wants Police to Protect...
Pelosi's Daughter Criticizes J6 Judges Who are 'Out for Blood' After Handing Down...
Mike Johnson Addresses Anti-Israel Hate As Hundreds Harass the School’s Jewish Community
DeSantis May Not Be Facing Biden in November, but Still Offers Perfect Response...
Lawmakers in One State Pass Legislation to Allow Teachers to Carry Guns in...
UnitedHealth Has Too Much Power
Former Democratic Rep. Who Lost to John Fetterman Sure Doesn't Like the Senator...
Biden Rewrote Title IX to Protect 'Trans' People. Here's How Somes States Responded.
Watch: Joe Biden's Latest Flub Is Laugh-Out-Loud Funny
Hundreds of Athletes Urge the NCAA to Allow Men to Compete Against Women
Tipsheet

Stopping SOPA: Website Blackouts In Protest of Online "Piracy" Bill

A few different websites have "gone dark" today in in order to highlight the pending Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA, in the House) and the PROTECT IP Act (PIPA, in the Senate). Wikipedia, Google, Reddit, Wired, and others all have their own statements or mini-protests with information on more and ways to contact your representatives on the issue.

Advertisement

In short, the bill expands a massive government overreach, allowing the Department of Justice to create a "blacklist" of websites that could be shut down without a hearing or trial.

 

The bills would empower the attorney general to create a blacklist of sites to be blocked by Internet service providers, search engines, payment providers and advertising networks, all without a court hearing or a trial. The House version goes further, allowing private companies to sue service providers for even briefly and unknowingly hosting content that infringes on copyright — a sharp change from current law, which protects the service providers from civil liability if they remove the problematic content immediately upon notification. The intention is not the same as China’s Great Firewall, a nationwide system of Web censorship, but the practical effect could be similar.

The House bill would also emulate China’s system of corporate “self-discipline,” making companies liable for users’ actions. The burden would be on the Web site operator to prove that the site was not being used for copyright infringement. The effect on user-generated sites like YouTube would be chilling.

Advertisement

The bills, whose vague language has websites everywhere worried, is being pushed by Hollywood movie studios, ex-Democrat Senator Chris Dodd, Patrick Leahy, and an unfortunately large number of Republican co-sponsors. There's a wide swath of opposition, however, and the Heritage Foundation, the Cato Institute and the Competitive Enterprise Institute have all issued statements in opposition.

Moreover, one of our favorite Congressmen, Darrell Issa, is a pretty vocal leader in opposition. Despite this, Harry Reid still intends on bringing the controversial legislation to the floor. Issa recorded a video for keepthewebopen.com in order to raise awareness:

A list of cosponsors of SOPA can be found here.

UPDATE: Marco Rubio posted a message on Facebook this morning saying that he has pulled his support from SOPA.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement