Terrorists Launch Attacks on Americans Building Biden’s Gaza Pier
The Pro-Hamas Activist Who Accosted Alec Baldwin Went Totally Insane During Piers Morgan...
Police at UT Austin Had the Perfect Response to a Pro-Hamas Activist Flipping...
Secret Service Agent Assigned to Kamala Harris Suffers What Looks Like a Mental...
Here's the Video Exposing What NYU's Pro-Hamas Students Really Think
White House Attempt to Cover for Biden's Latest Gaffe Might Be Its Most...
Stocks Tank After Disastrous First Quarter GDP Report
Someone Has to Be the Adult in the Room: Clear the Quad and...
US, 17 Other Nations Issue Joint Statement Calling on Hamas to Release Hostages
Florida Has Carried Out an Impressive Evacuation Operation in Haiti
Biden Administration's New Overtime Rule Blasted as an 'Attack on Small Businesses'
Students at Another Ivy League University Get Ready to Set Up Encampment
Could Texas Ban ‘Gender Nonconforming’ Teachers From Schools?
Should Republicans Be Concerned About the Pennsylvania Primary Results?
Mike Davis' Internet Accountability Project Calls on Senate Republicans to Break Up Big...
Tipsheet

The Fallacy of Structuring the Tax System on "the Rich"

Over the 2003-2008 period, as the country enjoyed an economic boom, state legislators allowed themselves to think the bubble would never burst. As a result, in many places, increasing prosperity lead to increased tax revenue and an increased desire to fund new programs with tax revenues of "the rich." Robert Frank, senior writer of the Wall Street Journal,
Advertisement
chronicles this and points out how state legislators ignored predictions that they wouldn't be able to finance their schemes forever.

New York, New Jersey, Connecticut and Illinois—states that are the most heavily reliant on the taxes of the wealthy—are now among those with the biggest budget holes. A large population of rich residents was a blessing during the boom, showering states with billions in tax revenue. But it became a curse as their incomes collapsed with financial markets.

Arriving at a time of greatly increased public spending, this reversal highlights the dependence of the states on the outsize incomes of the wealthy. The result for state finances and budgets has been extreme volatility.

In New York before the recession, the top 1% of earners, who made more than $580,000 a year, paid 41% of the state's income taxes in 2007, up from 25% in 1994, according to state tax data. The top 1% of taxpayers paid 40% or more of state income taxes in New Jersey and Connecticut. In Illinois, which has a flat income-tax rate of 5%, the top 15% paid more than half the state's income taxes.

Advertisement
There are two responses for this. One is that the tax system should be structured so as to not rely on taxes that can be highly volatile (paid, as the article notes, by wealthy financial professionals). The other is that state legislators would be wise not to imagine that times of increased prosperity would last forever.

It would be wise to consider both of these solutions. The problem is that government officials can scarcely keep their hands off of newfound tax revenue, even when the prudent thing to do is stash it away for a rainy day.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement