Here's Why I'm Concerned
Anyone Catch CNN's Embarrassing Error About the J6 Pipe Bomb Suspect?
Dan Bongino Wonders Why the FBI Seemingly Stopped Looking for the J6 Bomb...
People Are Driving to Tim Walz's House and Calling Him This...It's Hilarious
Here's What Caused a Lefty Trump Supporter to Laugh in the Face of...
Did Rep. Jim Himes Really Try to Make Martyrs Out of Narco-Terrorists?
Democrats Say Aftyn Behn Is the Future of Their Party? We're Fine With...
MS NOW Melts Down After SCOTUS Hands Texas Redistricting Win
Keith Ellison Has No Regrets About His Handling of the Feeding Our Future...
A Five-Point Plan for Republicans Heading Into 2026
Far-Left Commentator Mocks White Culture, Says U.S. Would Become a ‘Sh*thole’ Without Immi...
Tom Homan Torches Left-Wing Heckler Who Called Him a 'Racist' and a 'Traitor'
Making the Judiciary Great Again
Socialism Is Antithetical to the Genuine American Dream
The War Is Not Over, and There Is No Peace
Tipsheet

Another Big Lie About Israel Just Spread Like Wildfire

AP Photo/Sebastian Scheiner, Pool

Over the weekend the Israeli Defense Forces issued a precision strike on two Hamas leaders in the southern Gaza city of Rafah. After a fire broke out, which moved into a refugee tent, the global media and "international community" rushed to claim the IDF purposely bombed a humanitarian safe zone - killing dozens of women and children. 

Advertisement

For days this claim continued after a botched translation of remarks made by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. 

Given the IDF's history of taking painstaking steps to avoid civilian casualties, of course it wasn't true. The fire occurred because Hamas, in typical fashion, stored munitions next to the humanitarian tents. From former Jerusalem Post editor Avi Mayer: 

The facts about the Israeli airstrike in Rafah and the fire that followed are starting to become clear, and they totally change the story:

◾️ The Israeli airstrike that targeted senior Hamas commanders in Rafah was more than a mile away from the safe zone for Palestinian civilians and more than 550 feet away from shelters Hamas had falsely claimed were targeted in the incident

◾️ The munitions used were the smallest possible: two warheads of 37 lbs each, far smaller than what other Western militaries use in comparable situations

◾️ The munitions could not themselves have ignited a fire of the size that resulted in the deaths of Palestinian civilians, indicating that Hamas weapons stored in or near the targeted structure—of which the IDF was unaware—may have exploded and caused the fire

◾️ Footage of the scene taken by Palestinians and uploaded to social media platforms appears to show secondary explosions, further indicating the presence of weapons in the area

◾️ A phone call within Gaza intercepted by Israeli intelligence contained the admission that the structure targeted by the airstrike served as an ammunition warehouse, that secondary explosions took place, and that the Israeli airstrike wasn't powerful enough to have ignited the fire

◾️ Hamas has been operating from the area since October 7; a rocket launcher used to fire rockets into Israel was located 150 feet from the targeted structure, suggesting that additional weapons were likely stored nearby and may have caused the fire

While none of this makes the heartbreaking results of the fire any less dreadful, it does call into question a lot of the reporting surrounding this tragic incident, which appears to have been based on false information put out by Hamas, rather than the facts on the ground.

You'd think news organizations would learn. 

You'd be wrong.

Advertisement

Related:

TERRORISM

More corroboration:

The White House hinted earlier this week there was no deliberate strike on the camp and urged reporters to wait for an investigation to conclude.


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement