You Won’t Believe Who Just Cheered Iran’s Islamic Revolution
OpenAI Fires Executive Who Warned About 'Adult Mode'
Axios Is Having a Tough Go of Things This Week, and Media Are...
In Defense of Female Inmates
Canada's MAiD Program Is About to Get Even More Horrifying
Backlash Grows Over the University of Notre Dame's Appointment of Pro-Abortion Professor
Megyn Kelly’s Moral Blind Spot: Refusing to Condemn Candace Owens
Democrat Ohio Senate Hopeful Sherrod Brown Supports an AG Candidate Who Vowed to...
California Campaign Adviser Sentenced to 48 Months in PRC Agent Case
19 New York City Residents Reportedly Freeze to Death After Mamdani Changes Homeless...
Colorado Woman Allegedly Billed $400K to Medicaid for Family’s Phantom Medical Rides
Philadelphia Men Allegedly Used ChatGPT to Scam Minnesota Out of $3.5M
Queens Duo Charged in Alleged Decade-Long $120 Million Medicare Scam
White House Blasts Washington Post Over ‘Breaking’ Story Trump Announced Last Year
‘Customer Has Spoken’: Ford Motor Company Faces $11 Billion Hit on EV Investments
Tipsheet

Supreme Court Hands Down Huge Victory on School Choice

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 Tuesday morning that government tuition assistance programs cannot discriminate against religious schools. The opinion is from Carson v. Makin, a case out of Maine. 

Advertisement

"Maine has enacted a program of tuition assistance for parents who live in school districts that do not operate a secondary school of their own. Under the program, parents designate the secondary school they would like their child to attend—public or private—and the school district transmits payments to that school to help defray the costs of tuition. Most private schools are eligible to receive the payments, so long as they are 'nonsectarian,'" the majority opinion, written by Chief Justice John Roberts, states. "The question presented is whether this restriction violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment."

"The Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment protects against 'indirect coercion or penalties on the free exercise of religion, not just outright prohibitions,'" the opinion states. "A State’s antiestablishment interest does not justify enactments that exclude some members of the community from an otherwise generally available public benefit because of their religious exercise."

Advertisement

The ruling is being celebrated as a win for school choice.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos