Why Is the Party That Supports Abortion and Mutilating Kids Offended by Trump's...
After the Fall of Swalwell, Is This Dem Rep Next?
Eric Swalwell Is a Lawyer, Right. He'll Should Be Fine After He Leaves...
Did You Miss Swalwell's Lawyer Going in CNN Over the Weekend? It Was...
Would Dems Have Expelled Swalwell If He'd Stayed? Yes, But for Other Reasons
Eric Swalwell Learned a Valuable Lesson as His Career Burns to Ash
This Chimpanzee Civil War Happening in Uganda Is Totally Bananas
Mamdani Announces His Plan to Destroy NYC's Bodegas Will Take Effect Next Year
Israel Likely Just Thwarted Another Major Terror Attack
Are the U.S. and Iran Going to Return to Pakistan for More Negotiations?
New Jersey's Democratic Congressional Nominee Was Spotted Wearing an Interesting Shirt
Major US Companies Still Offer to Cover Trans Drugs, Surgeries to Minors Despite...
The App Store Accountability Act Gets the Problem—and the Policy—Wrong
Us and Them
Ted Cruz Is Right to Put the FTC Back Under the Microscope
Tipsheet

Rand Paul Rips Fauci for Saying He Is a 'Representative of Science'

Rand Paul Rips Fauci for Saying He Is a 'Representative of Science'
Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool via AP

Republican Senator and Dr. Rand Paul is tearing into Dr. Anthony Fauci after the bureaucrat claimed he "represents the science" during a Sunday interview with "Face the Nation." 

Advertisement

Paul has been battling Fauci since the early days of the pandemic in 2020. First, Paul took Fauci on over schools and was correct when he said they shouldn't remain closed. 

Then, Paul took Fauci on over gain-of-function research – which is used to juice up dangerous viruses – being conducted in labs under Fauci's watch. 

Advertisement

While Fauci denied gain-of-function experiments ever took place, his own agency released a letter in October admitting the dangerous research did in fact happen at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. 

In July, Paul referred Fauci for criminal prosecution

"Without question the evidence we presented in Committee yesterday shows that the NIH was funding research in Wuhan. We showed the exact numerical series of numbers that goes with the grant number, so yes they were funding the Wuhan lab," Paul wrote in a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland. "The second question is whether or not the research was gain-of-function. The NIH actually defines gain-of-function, and I read that definition to him [Fauci] but he didn't listen, the definition is that any kind of animal virus that occurs in nature that affects animals only or infects animals only if you recombine it or mutate it or adapt in a lab with other viruses so it has characteristics that change it to an animal only virus to being a virus that can now infect humans, that you've gained in function...you've made it more dangerous. Without question this is what happened in the Wuhan lab." 

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement