Have Democrats Ever Considered Not Being Insane?
Jill Biden Has Become the Political Long COVID for the Dems
A Cornerstone of Graham Platner's Campaign Just Got Blown Up
Well, This Graham Platner Tweet Is Something a Nazi Would Say
Is the San Francisco Chronicle Serious About This Piece About Gay Rights and...
So, That's Why Jill Biden's Book Is Coming Out Now
The Underreported Side of the Graham Platner Fiasco in Maine
Here's Why Google Is Gonna Release Millions of Mosquitoes in These Communities
Paul Krugman Calls for a Purging of the United States, and Guess Who...
As Mamdani Demonizes NYC Landlords, Here's a Taste of the Nonsense Landlords Deal...
Scott Pelley Had a Meltdown Over Bari Weiss and Nick Bilton Running CBS
One Migrant Learned the Trump Administration Is Serious About Ending Fraudulent Asylum Cla...
Here's Who Trump Picked As Tulsi Gabbard's Acting Successor
The Country That Needs Talent Is Importing Welfare Dependency and Exporting Its Best
Trump’s Nationwide Shabbat and the Choices Facing American Jews
Tipsheet

Rand Paul Rips Fauci for Saying He Is a 'Representative of Science'

Rand Paul Rips Fauci for Saying He Is a 'Representative of Science'
Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool via AP

Republican Senator and Dr. Rand Paul is tearing into Dr. Anthony Fauci after the bureaucrat claimed he "represents the science" during a Sunday interview with "Face the Nation." 

Advertisement

Paul has been battling Fauci since the early days of the pandemic in 2020. First, Paul took Fauci on over schools and was correct when he said they shouldn't remain closed. 

Then, Paul took Fauci on over gain-of-function research – which is used to juice up dangerous viruses – being conducted in labs under Fauci's watch. 

Advertisement

While Fauci denied gain-of-function experiments ever took place, his own agency released a letter in October admitting the dangerous research did in fact happen at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. 

In July, Paul referred Fauci for criminal prosecution

"Without question the evidence we presented in Committee yesterday shows that the NIH was funding research in Wuhan. We showed the exact numerical series of numbers that goes with the grant number, so yes they were funding the Wuhan lab," Paul wrote in a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland. "The second question is whether or not the research was gain-of-function. The NIH actually defines gain-of-function, and I read that definition to him [Fauci] but he didn't listen, the definition is that any kind of animal virus that occurs in nature that affects animals only or infects animals only if you recombine it or mutate it or adapt in a lab with other viruses so it has characteristics that change it to an animal only virus to being a virus that can now infect humans, that you've gained in function...you've made it more dangerous. Without question this is what happened in the Wuhan lab." 

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement