America Dominates in Food, Too
The Graham Platner Receipts on Dems Were Whipped Out...by a CNN Host?
Graham Platner's First Accuser Again Sets the Record Straight...and Torches the NYT
Scott Jennings Points Out Dems Are Doing That Thing That They Did to...
About That Black Woman Photographed With a Bunch of Supposed White Nationalists in...
The Mets Are Terrible, But This Play From the KC Royals Is Making...
'They Refused to Talk to My Roommate': Woman Slams Legacy Media Outlet for...
'The Odyssey' Critics Have a Good Point, Which Is Why They're Being Smeared
Could a Republican Be the Next Governor of New York? At Least One...
The New York Times Is Trying to Paint the Graham Platner Implosion As...
Watch What President Trump Says About Fellow NATO Member Spain During Visit to...
President Trump Says the Iran Ceasefire Is Over
U.S. Forces Strike More Than 80 Targets Across Iran
No, Paris, US Air Conditioners Did Not Cause Europe’s Heat Wave
'Big Attack' Against Iran Possible on Wednesday Night
Tipsheet

Rand Paul Rips Fauci for Saying He Is a 'Representative of Science'

Rand Paul Rips Fauci for Saying He Is a 'Representative of Science'
Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool via AP

Republican Senator and Dr. Rand Paul is tearing into Dr. Anthony Fauci after the bureaucrat claimed he "represents the science" during a Sunday interview with "Face the Nation." 

Advertisement

Paul has been battling Fauci since the early days of the pandemic in 2020. First, Paul took Fauci on over schools and was correct when he said they shouldn't remain closed. 

Then, Paul took Fauci on over gain-of-function research – which is used to juice up dangerous viruses – being conducted in labs under Fauci's watch. 

Advertisement

While Fauci denied gain-of-function experiments ever took place, his own agency released a letter in October admitting the dangerous research did in fact happen at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. 

In July, Paul referred Fauci for criminal prosecution

"Without question the evidence we presented in Committee yesterday shows that the NIH was funding research in Wuhan. We showed the exact numerical series of numbers that goes with the grant number, so yes they were funding the Wuhan lab," Paul wrote in a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland. "The second question is whether or not the research was gain-of-function. The NIH actually defines gain-of-function, and I read that definition to him [Fauci] but he didn't listen, the definition is that any kind of animal virus that occurs in nature that affects animals only or infects animals only if you recombine it or mutate it or adapt in a lab with other viruses so it has characteristics that change it to an animal only virus to being a virus that can now infect humans, that you've gained in function...you've made it more dangerous. Without question this is what happened in the Wuhan lab." 

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement