When the Courts Actually Work
We Some HUGE News About South Carolina's Redistricting Effort
The Steyer Smear
NY Times Deals With More 'Dog Rape' Fallout; Katie Tur Is Entirely Unfamiliar...
The Wonderful, Loving Left
Anderson Cooper Oozes '60 Minutes' Defines 'Independence' and 'Truth'
Democratic Control of Government Means Redefining America
The Other Iranian Threat
When 'Mostly Peaceful' Crosses Into Conspiracy: The DOJ Finally Reads the Riot Act
Spanberger, Meador, and the SPLC
Planned Parenthood Does Not Operate in the Public Interest; It Should Not Receive...
Transgender Movement on the March
The Political Reality of America As a Christian Nation
The Federal Government Can’t Save States’ Rights By Subverting Them
Critics Are Missing the Real Reason Trump’s Religious Liberty Commission Exists
Tipsheet

Rand Paul Rips Fauci for Saying He Is a 'Representative of Science'

Rand Paul Rips Fauci for Saying He Is a 'Representative of Science'
Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool via AP

Republican Senator and Dr. Rand Paul is tearing into Dr. Anthony Fauci after the bureaucrat claimed he "represents the science" during a Sunday interview with "Face the Nation." 

Advertisement

Paul has been battling Fauci since the early days of the pandemic in 2020. First, Paul took Fauci on over schools and was correct when he said they shouldn't remain closed. 

Then, Paul took Fauci on over gain-of-function research – which is used to juice up dangerous viruses – being conducted in labs under Fauci's watch. 

Advertisement

While Fauci denied gain-of-function experiments ever took place, his own agency released a letter in October admitting the dangerous research did in fact happen at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. 

In July, Paul referred Fauci for criminal prosecution

"Without question the evidence we presented in Committee yesterday shows that the NIH was funding research in Wuhan. We showed the exact numerical series of numbers that goes with the grant number, so yes they were funding the Wuhan lab," Paul wrote in a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland. "The second question is whether or not the research was gain-of-function. The NIH actually defines gain-of-function, and I read that definition to him [Fauci] but he didn't listen, the definition is that any kind of animal virus that occurs in nature that affects animals only or infects animals only if you recombine it or mutate it or adapt in a lab with other viruses so it has characteristics that change it to an animal only virus to being a virus that can now infect humans, that you've gained in function...you've made it more dangerous. Without question this is what happened in the Wuhan lab." 

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement