Platner Is a Hilarious Symptom of Progressive Failure
You Won't Believe What This Guy Did to His Junk...You Can't Make This...
The One Danger That Exists for Susan Collins Now That Graham Platner Is...
Here Are the Dems Running to Replace Graham Platner. It's a Total Circus
Mike Johnson Eyes Legislation to End the Birthright Citizenship
Abdul El-Sayed Has Said He's a Physician, but There's Just One Problem With...
This Washington State Senator Said Something Extremely Disturbing About Girls' Bodies and...
Hochul Brags About Taxing New Yorkers to Stick It to Trump
Graham Platner Supporter Shows Exactly Why He Appealed to a Segment of Democrats
David Crowley Exits Wisconsin Governor's Race, and Here's Who He's Endorsing
'Total Eclipse of the Heart' Singer Bonnie Tyler Dies Aged 75
Never Forget How Alex Vindman Responded to Charlie Kirk's Assassination
Iran Is Already Begging for a Deal. Don't Give Them One.
President Trump Is Going to Ask the Supreme Court to Rehear Birthright Citizenship....
It's Official: Palm Beach's Airport Now Named After President Trump
Tipsheet

Rand Paul Rips Fauci for Saying He Is a 'Representative of Science'

Rand Paul Rips Fauci for Saying He Is a 'Representative of Science'
Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool via AP

Republican Senator and Dr. Rand Paul is tearing into Dr. Anthony Fauci after the bureaucrat claimed he "represents the science" during a Sunday interview with "Face the Nation." 

Advertisement

Paul has been battling Fauci since the early days of the pandemic in 2020. First, Paul took Fauci on over schools and was correct when he said they shouldn't remain closed. 

Then, Paul took Fauci on over gain-of-function research – which is used to juice up dangerous viruses – being conducted in labs under Fauci's watch. 

Advertisement

While Fauci denied gain-of-function experiments ever took place, his own agency released a letter in October admitting the dangerous research did in fact happen at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. 

In July, Paul referred Fauci for criminal prosecution

"Without question the evidence we presented in Committee yesterday shows that the NIH was funding research in Wuhan. We showed the exact numerical series of numbers that goes with the grant number, so yes they were funding the Wuhan lab," Paul wrote in a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland. "The second question is whether or not the research was gain-of-function. The NIH actually defines gain-of-function, and I read that definition to him [Fauci] but he didn't listen, the definition is that any kind of animal virus that occurs in nature that affects animals only or infects animals only if you recombine it or mutate it or adapt in a lab with other viruses so it has characteristics that change it to an animal only virus to being a virus that can now infect humans, that you've gained in function...you've made it more dangerous. Without question this is what happened in the Wuhan lab." 

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement