Here's the Question That Really Got Under Tim Walz's Skin
Yet Another Liberal Media Narrative Just Crumbled
This State Is Suing Roblox for Allowing Child Predators to Run Rampant on...
Who Is James Talarico?
Footage Shows Black Lives Matter Leader Literally Under Assault for Mishandling Donation M...
Iranian Regime Is About to Find Out Why Attacking Arab Nations Was a...
Nancy Mace Just Wholloped Tim Walz in a Hearing About Minnesota's Rampant Fraud
Whoopi Goldberg Is Left Speechless When Confronted With the Reality of Women in...
When It Comes to Operation Epic Fury, John Fetterman Is the Only Sane...
Would SCOTUS Ruling on Marijuana Users' Gun Rights Help Hunter Biden?
Registered Child Sex Offender Running for Fresno City Council, Holds Event Outside Element...
Marco Rubio Fires Back at Critics of Operation Epic Fury: Let Me Explain...
The Supreme Court Hands the Trump Administration a Victory on Immigration
Iran's Last Hope Is American Division
Democrats Lie and Slander U.S. to Stop Commander in Chief
Tipsheet

Rand Paul Rips Fauci for Saying He Is a 'Representative of Science'

Rand Paul Rips Fauci for Saying He Is a 'Representative of Science'
Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool via AP

Republican Senator and Dr. Rand Paul is tearing into Dr. Anthony Fauci after the bureaucrat claimed he "represents the science" during a Sunday interview with "Face the Nation." 

Advertisement

Paul has been battling Fauci since the early days of the pandemic in 2020. First, Paul took Fauci on over schools and was correct when he said they shouldn't remain closed. 

Then, Paul took Fauci on over gain-of-function research – which is used to juice up dangerous viruses – being conducted in labs under Fauci's watch. 

Advertisement

While Fauci denied gain-of-function experiments ever took place, his own agency released a letter in October admitting the dangerous research did in fact happen at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. 

In July, Paul referred Fauci for criminal prosecution

"Without question the evidence we presented in Committee yesterday shows that the NIH was funding research in Wuhan. We showed the exact numerical series of numbers that goes with the grant number, so yes they were funding the Wuhan lab," Paul wrote in a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland. "The second question is whether or not the research was gain-of-function. The NIH actually defines gain-of-function, and I read that definition to him [Fauci] but he didn't listen, the definition is that any kind of animal virus that occurs in nature that affects animals only or infects animals only if you recombine it or mutate it or adapt in a lab with other viruses so it has characteristics that change it to an animal only virus to being a virus that can now infect humans, that you've gained in function...you've made it more dangerous. Without question this is what happened in the Wuhan lab." 

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement