You Can’t Out-MAGA Donald Trump
Washington Predicted Trump Would Endorse Cornyn. Washington Predicts Lots of Things.
Why This NBC Poll on Dems and ICE Is Flat-Out Hilarious
The Liberal Media Reaction to the NYC IED Attack Was Laughably Predictable
Here's Why a Former White Sox Pitcher Is Suing His Team
Of Course Mamdani Won't Condemn the ISIS-Loving Terrorists
After Melting Down Over Noem, Thom Tillis Is Now Demanding Trump Fire Stephen...
Has Iran's New Ayatollah Already Been Wounded?
Wisconsin Man Who Killed Parents to Finance Trump Assassination Plan Just Learned His...
The World Urges Australia to Protect the Iranian Women's Football Team. Here's Why.
So Much for 'Free' Stuff: Mamdani Proposes Eliminating Free Parking in NYC
It Turns Out Democrats Once Waged War on Married Female Voters, and Guess...
This Is What Democratic Socialists of America Really Think of Displaced Iranians and...
The Motive Isn’t a Mystery
President Trump Responds to Rising Oil Prices: 'Will Drop Rapidly' After Operation Epic...
Tipsheet

Rand Paul Rips Fauci for Saying He Is a 'Representative of Science'

Rand Paul Rips Fauci for Saying He Is a 'Representative of Science'
Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool via AP

Republican Senator and Dr. Rand Paul is tearing into Dr. Anthony Fauci after the bureaucrat claimed he "represents the science" during a Sunday interview with "Face the Nation." 

Advertisement

Paul has been battling Fauci since the early days of the pandemic in 2020. First, Paul took Fauci on over schools and was correct when he said they shouldn't remain closed. 

Then, Paul took Fauci on over gain-of-function research – which is used to juice up dangerous viruses – being conducted in labs under Fauci's watch. 

Advertisement

While Fauci denied gain-of-function experiments ever took place, his own agency released a letter in October admitting the dangerous research did in fact happen at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. 

In July, Paul referred Fauci for criminal prosecution

"Without question the evidence we presented in Committee yesterday shows that the NIH was funding research in Wuhan. We showed the exact numerical series of numbers that goes with the grant number, so yes they were funding the Wuhan lab," Paul wrote in a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland. "The second question is whether or not the research was gain-of-function. The NIH actually defines gain-of-function, and I read that definition to him [Fauci] but he didn't listen, the definition is that any kind of animal virus that occurs in nature that affects animals only or infects animals only if you recombine it or mutate it or adapt in a lab with other viruses so it has characteristics that change it to an animal only virus to being a virus that can now infect humans, that you've gained in function...you've made it more dangerous. Without question this is what happened in the Wuhan lab." 

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement