Why Graham Platner's Top Adviser Has His Colleagues Cringing Right Now
Is This Why It's Taking California So Long to Count Its Ballots?
Here's What a Dem Rep Said About Graham Platner. Is the Dam Breaking?
Bill Maher Beat This Dem Senator's Talking Points About CBS News and Trump...
ESPN Reporter Had the Perfect Description for the New York Knicks Right Now
Flesh-Eating Parasites Threaten American Livestock Industry
Detroit Animal Shelter Scandal Resurfaces as Abdul El-Sayed Launches U.S. Senate Bid
Texas Rangers to Hold 'Faith and Family Night' Instead of Caving to LGBT...
USDA Subpoenas Four States Blocking SNAP Fraud Investigation
Why Is the 'Party of Decency' Running So Many Questionable Characters?
Why Are Democrats Siccing Staffers on People Asking Questions?
The Amendment That Corrected the Founders
The Medicare Turf War That’s Breaking Hearts
Republicans Can Survive the Midterms If We Do This One Thing to Cut...
Persons Are Not Material for Invasive Content Creators: The Case for Anti-Surveillance Tec...
Tipsheet

Rand Paul Rips Fauci for Saying He Is a 'Representative of Science'

Rand Paul Rips Fauci for Saying He Is a 'Representative of Science'
Jim Lo Scalzo/Pool via AP

Republican Senator and Dr. Rand Paul is tearing into Dr. Anthony Fauci after the bureaucrat claimed he "represents the science" during a Sunday interview with "Face the Nation." 

Advertisement

Paul has been battling Fauci since the early days of the pandemic in 2020. First, Paul took Fauci on over schools and was correct when he said they shouldn't remain closed. 

Then, Paul took Fauci on over gain-of-function research – which is used to juice up dangerous viruses – being conducted in labs under Fauci's watch. 

Advertisement

While Fauci denied gain-of-function experiments ever took place, his own agency released a letter in October admitting the dangerous research did in fact happen at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. 

In July, Paul referred Fauci for criminal prosecution

"Without question the evidence we presented in Committee yesterday shows that the NIH was funding research in Wuhan. We showed the exact numerical series of numbers that goes with the grant number, so yes they were funding the Wuhan lab," Paul wrote in a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland. "The second question is whether or not the research was gain-of-function. The NIH actually defines gain-of-function, and I read that definition to him [Fauci] but he didn't listen, the definition is that any kind of animal virus that occurs in nature that affects animals only or infects animals only if you recombine it or mutate it or adapt in a lab with other viruses so it has characteristics that change it to an animal only virus to being a virus that can now infect humans, that you've gained in function...you've made it more dangerous. Without question this is what happened in the Wuhan lab." 

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement