Person of Interest Arrested in Connection to the Abduction of Nancy Guthrie
Democrat Presidential Hopeful Has Been Telling Some Weird Lies About His Ancestor and...
The Press Gets Unwound by Their Solitary Sources, and the NYT Goes Winter...
Chewing the Fat on the Left's 'Body Positivity' Flip Flop
National Nurses Union Calls for the Abolition of ICE
Delaware Smacked Down for Trying to Enforce Law, Ignoring Injunction
The Clintons Are So Over
Tensions Rise At the White House's New Religious Liberty Commission as One Member...
Mike Johnson Blasts Mamdani's DOH for Creating a ‘Global Oppression’ Group Focused on...
Kentucky Senate Candidate Andy Barr Endorses Pro-Amnesty Book Despite Pledging to Be ‘Amer...
Woke DC Grand Jury Denies Indictments of Six Democrats Accused of Sedition
The NYT Report on the Marijuana Epidemic Is a Startling Warning
Democrat Attacks Christians, Calls Muslim Jihad on the West a 'Middle Eastern Version...
Even CNN Knows That Democrats Are on the Wrong Side of the Voter...
Ken Paxton Notches Immigration Win As Premier Community for Illegals Pays Out $68...
Tipsheet

Second Amendment Advocates Secure Major Handgun Victory in Court

(AP Photo/ Rick Bowmer)

In a 2-1 decision Tuesday afternoon, the Fourth Circuit Court of appeals struck down the age requirement for purchasing a handgun, saying legal adults have a constitutional right to own a firearm at age 18. Before the ruling, the age requirement to legally own and purchase a firearm was 21. 

Advertisement

“Our nation’s most cherished constitutional rights vest no later than 18. And the Second Amendment’s right to keep and bear arms is no different,” Judge Julias Richardson wrote in the opinion. "We first find that 18-year-olds possess Second Amendment rights. They enjoy almost every other constitutional right, and they were required at the time of the Founding to serve in the militia and furnish their own weapons. We then ask, as our precedent requires, whether the government has met its burden to justify its infringement of those rights under the appropriate level of scrutiny."

"To justify this restriction, Congress used disproportionate crime rates to craft overinclusive laws that restrict the rights of overwhelmingly law-abiding citizens. And in doing so, Congress focused on purchases from licensed dealers without establishing those dealers as the source of the guns 18- to 20-year-olds use to commit crimes. So we hold that the challenged federal laws and regulations are unconstitutional under the Second Amendment," he continued. "Despite the weighty interest in reducing crime and violence, we refuse to relegate either the Second Amendment or 18- to 20-year-olds to a second-class status."

Advertisement

Related:

SECOND AMENDMENT

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement